Re: [PATCH v3 51/56] ARM: omap2plus_defconfig: Update for moved DSI command mode panel

2020-11-09 Thread Laurent Pinchart
ANEL_DSI_CM=m > +CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_DSI_CM=m Is thi the right location, have you regenerated the defconfig from a .config, or just renamed the option ? With the location fixed if needed, Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > CONFIG_DRM_TILCDC=m > CONFIG_DRM_PA

Re: [PATCH v3 53/56] drm/omap: remove unused display.c

2020-11-09 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Tomi, Thank you for the patch. On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 02:03:30PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > The functions in display.c are not used, so drop the file. > > Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Makefile |

Re: [PATCH v3 52/56] drm/omap: squash omapdrm sub-modules into one

2020-11-09 Thread Laurent Pinchart
config(struct omap_dss_device > *dssdev, > dssdev->dss->mgr_ops->set_lcd_config(dssdev->dss->mgr_ops_priv, >dssdev->dispc_channel, config); > } > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(dss_mgr_set_lcd_config); > > int dss_mgr_enabl

Re: [PATCH v3 54/56] drm/omap: drop unused owner field

2020-11-09 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Tomi, Thank you for the patch. On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 02:03:31PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > dssdev->owner is set, but never used. We can drop the field. > > Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dpi.c

Re: [PATCH v3 55/56] drm/omap: remove dispc_ops

2020-11-09 Thread Laurent Pinchart
dispc_ops and use direct > calls to dispc. > > Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/base.c| 6 -- > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c | 101 +++--- > drivers/gpu/d

Re: [PATCH v3 56/56] drm/omap: remove dss_mgr_ops

2020-11-09 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Tomi, Thank you for the patch. On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 02:03:33PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > dss_mgr_ops was needed with the multi-module architecture, but is no > longer needed. We can thus remove it and use direct calls. > > Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen Acked-by: Laur

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: Convert graph bindings to json-schema

2020-11-11 Thread Laurent Pinchart
scription: | > + phandle to an 'endpoint' subnode of a remote device node. > +$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle > + > +required: > + - remote-endpoint As noted elsewhere, this shouldn't be required. Sho

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: usb-connector: Add reference to graph schema

2020-11-11 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, Thank you for the patch. On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 02:36:55PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > Now that we have a graph schema, reference it from the usb-connector > schema. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > --- > v3: new patch > >

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dt-bindings: panel: common: Add reference to graph schema

2020-11-11 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, Thank you for the patch. On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 02:36:56PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > Now that we have a graph schema, reference it from the common panel > schema. > > Cc: Thierry Reding > Cc: Sam Ravnborg > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: Convert graph bindings to json-schema

2020-11-11 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 08:25:40AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 8:00 AM Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 02:36:54PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > From: Sameer Pujar > > > > > > Convert device tree binding

Re: [PATCH v3 30/56] drm/omap: dsi: move panel refresh function to host

2020-11-11 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Tomi, On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 05:34:52PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 09/11/2020 12:10, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 02:03:07PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >> From: Sebastian Reichel > >> > >> This moves the panel re

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: Convert graph bindings to json-schema

2020-11-11 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 05:03:26PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 8:27 AM Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 08:25:40AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 8:00 AM Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > On M

Re: [PATCH v3 30/56] drm/omap: dsi: move panel refresh function to host

2020-11-16 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Tomi, On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 10:08:21AM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 11/11/2020 17:58, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c > >>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c > >&

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: Use OF graph schema

2020-11-17 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Thierry Reding > Cc: Sam Ravnborg > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Cc: Maxime Ripard > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring > --- > graph.yaml is in the dtschema repo, so this can go into drm-misc and > hopefully anythin

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/bridge: Add MAINTAINERS entry for DRM drivers for bridge chip bindings

2022-03-08 Thread Laurent Pinchart
ernej Skrabec > S: Maintained > T: git git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc > +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ > F: drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ > > DRM DRIVERS FOR EXYNOS -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH V3 05/13] drm: bridge: icn6211: Add DSI lane count DT property parsing

2022-03-10 Thread Laurent Pinchart
fundamentally the DT excerpt Jagan provided is > correct. If the bridge supports DCS, there's no reason to use the OF > graph in the first place: the bridge node will be a child node of the > MIPI-DSI controller (and there's no obligation to use the OF-graph for a > MIPI-DSI controller). > > I believe port@0 should be made optional (or downright removed if > MIPI-DCS in the only control bus). I think we should make ports mandatory in all cases actually. The DT parent-child hierarchy is meant to model control relations between devices, so a DSI device controlled through DCS should be a child of the DSI controller. No disagreement there. The OF graph is meant to model data connections. While a DSI device controlled through DCS will use the same DSI link for data transfer, the two concepts are different. We have taken shortcuts and decided to not use OF graph for some DSI devices (not necessarily as a well thought decision, it was sometimes just not considered). This has led to different issues that we're having to deal with today, making it more difficult to develop generic code. Going forward, I think new bindings should always use OF graph to model the data connection. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH V3 05/13] drm: bridge: icn6211: Add DSI lane count DT property parsing

2022-03-10 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Maxime, On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:57:38AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 12:42:12PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 01:51:40PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 11:29:59AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: &g

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Support DisplayPort (non-eDP) mode

2022-03-10 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Kieran, Thank you for the patch. On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 03:22:25PM +, Kieran Bingham wrote: > From: Laurent Pinchart > > Despite the SN65DSI86 being an eDP bridge, on some systems its output is > routed to a DisplayPort connector. Enable DisplayPort mode when the next &g

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Implement bridge connector operations

2022-03-10 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Kieran, Thank you for the patch. On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 03:22:26PM +, Kieran Bingham wrote: > From: Laurent Pinchart > > Implement the bridge connector-related .get_edid() operation, and report > the related bridge capabilities and type. > > Signed-off-by: Laurent

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: drm: bridge: adi,adv7533: Document adi,disable-lanes-override property

2022-03-10 Thread Laurent Pinchart
description: Number of DSI data lanes connected to the DSI host. > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Support hotplug detection

2022-03-10 Thread Laurent Pinchart
ling mode only for now. Don't we support IRQ mode too now ? > The implementation is limited to the bridge operations, as the connector > operations are legacy and new users should use > DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR. > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart > Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: use drm_encoder pointer for drm_writeback_connector

2022-03-10 Thread Laurent Pinchart
<< drm_crtc_index(&rcrtc->crtc); > + wb_conn->encoder = kzalloc(sizeof(struct drm_encoder), GFP_KERNEL); Where is this freed ? > + wb_conn->encoder->possible_crtcs = 1 << drm_crtc_index(&rcrtc->crtc); > drm_connector_helper_add(&wb_conn->base, >&rcar_du_wb_conn_helper_funcs); > -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm: allow real encoder to be passed for drm_writeback_connector

2022-03-11 Thread Laurent Pinchart
* > > +* For some vendor drivers, the hardware resources are shared > > between > > +* writeback encoder and rest of the display pipeline. > > +* To accommodate such cases, encoder is a handle to the real > > encoder > > +* hardware. > > +* > > +* For current existing writeback users, this shall continue to be > > the > > +* embedded encoder for the writeback connector. > > +* > > */ > > - struct drm_encoder encoder; > > + struct drm_encoder *encoder; > > > > /** > > * @pixel_formats_blob_ptr: -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: use drm_encoder pointer for drm_writeback_connector

2022-03-13 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Abhinav On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 09:47:17AM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote: > On 3/10/2022 11:28 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 05:49:59PM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote: > >> Make changes to rcar_du driver to start using drm_encoder pointer > >>

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] drm: allow real encoder to be passed for drm_writeback_connector

2022-03-17 Thread Laurent Pinchart
DRM framework requirements. The users of the >* @drm_writeback_connector control the behaviour of the @encoder >* by passing the @enc_funcs parameter to drm_writeback_connector_init() >* function. > + * > + * For some vendor drivers, the hardware resources are shared between > + * writeback encoder and rest of the display pipeline. > + * To accommodate such cases, encoder is a handle to the real encoder > + * hardware. > + * > + * For current existing writeback users, this shall continue to be the > + * embedded encoder for the writeback connector. > + * > + */ > + struct drm_encoder *encoder; > + > + /** > + * @internal_encoder: internal encoder used by writeback when > + * a real encoder is not provided by the vendor drm drivers. > + * @encoder will be assigned to this for those cases. >*/ > - struct drm_encoder encoder; > + struct drm_encoder internal_encoder; None of this belong here. > > /** >* @pixel_formats_blob_ptr: > @@ -150,7 +166,7 @@ int drm_writeback_connector_init(struct drm_device *dev, >struct drm_writeback_connector *wb_connector, >const struct drm_connector_funcs *con_funcs, >const struct drm_encoder_helper_funcs > *enc_helper_funcs, > - const u32 *formats, int n_formats); > + const u32 *formats, int n_formats, uint32_t > possible_crtcs); > > int drm_writeback_set_fb(struct drm_connector_state *conn_state, >struct drm_framebuffer *fb); -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: bridge: Drop requirement on input port for DSI devices

2022-03-23 Thread Laurent Pinchart
5216c27fc0ad..a412a1da950f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/toshiba,tc358762.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/toshiba,tc358762.yaml > @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ properties: >Video port for MIPI DPI output (panel or connector). > > required: > - - port@0 >- port@1 > > required: -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: bridge: Drop requirement on input port for DSI devices

2022-03-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Maxime, On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 09:18:19AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:38:19PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Maxime, > > > > (CC'ing Sakari) > > > > Thank you for the patch. > > > > On Wed, Mar

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: bridge: Drop requirement on input port for DSI devices

2022-03-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Maxime, On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 03:23:24PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 03:43:42PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 09:18:19AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:38:19PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH 06/22] drm/bridge: Use drm_mode_copy()

2022-02-18 Thread Laurent Pinchart
py(&mode, E, S) > + drm_mode_copy(&mode, E) > ) > > @@ > struct drm_display_mode *mode; > @@ > - &*mode > + mode > > Cc: Andrzej Hajda > Cc: Neil Armstrong > Cc: Robert Foss > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Cc: Jonas Karlman > Cc: Jernej

Re: [PATCH] drm/panel: simple: Fix Innolux G070Y2-L01 BPP settings

2022-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > Cc: Christoph Fritz > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Cc: Maxime Ripard > Cc: Sam Ravnborg > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >

Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] clk: Improve clock range handling

2022-02-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Stephen, (CC'ing Jean-Michel) On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 06:24:08PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Laurent Pinchart (2022-02-14 01:45:56) > > Hi Maxime and Stephen, > > > > We have recently posted a driver for the BCM2711 Unicam CSI-2 receiver > > (see [

Re: [PATCH] drm: rcar-du: switch to devm_drm_of_get_bridge

2022-02-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
truct rcar_lvds *lvds) > > { > > int ret; > > > > - ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(lvds->dev->of_node, 1, 0, > > - &lvds->panel, &lvds->next_bridge); > > I guess lvds->panel can be removed from the rcar_lvds struct as well? It's used in rcar_lvds_get_lvds_mode() though, so this patch introduces a regression. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH] drm: rcar-du: do not restart rcar-du groups on gen3

2022-02-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
by requesting >* a restart of the group. See rcar_du_plane_atomic_update() for a more >* detailed explanation. > - * > - * TODO: Check whether this is still needed on Gen3. >*/ > crtc->group->need_restart = true; > -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

[PATCH 0/2] drm: rcar-du: Avoid flicker when enabling a VSP plane

2022-02-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

[PATCH 1/2] drm: rcar-du: Don't select VSP1 sink on Gen3

2022-02-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
The VSP1 sink selection through register DEFR8 is only available on Gen2 hardware. Skip it on Gen3. Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart --- drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.c b

[PATCH 2/2] drm: rcar-du: Don't restart group when enabling plane on Gen3

2022-02-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
On Gen3 hardware enabling a VSP plane doesn't change any register that requires DRES to take effect. Avoid a group restart in that case. Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart --- drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.c | 6 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c | 9 - 2 files ch

Re: [PATCH] drm: rcar-du: Simplify division/shift logic

2022-02-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
;< pll->pll_e) > + output = (fin * pll->pll_n / pll->pll_m >> pll->pll_e) > / div7 / pll->div; > error = (long)(output - target) * 1 / (long)target; > -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/bridge: Document the expected behaviour of DSI host controllers

2022-02-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
o pre_enable or after > + * post_disable, the exact state of the lanes is undefined at this point. The > + * DSI host should initialise the interface, transmit the data, and then > disable > + * the interface again. > + * > + * Ultra Low Power State (ULPS) is not explicitly support

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Introduce DRM_BRIDGE_OP_UPSTREAM_FIRST to alter bridge init order

2022-02-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
iter); > - if (WARN_ON(!old_bridge_state)) > - return; > + drm_atomic_bridge_call_pre_enable(iter, old_state); > > - iter->funcs->atomic_pre_enable(iter, old_bridge_state); > - } else if (iter->funcs->pre_enable) { > - iter->funcs->pre_enable(iter); > - } > + if (iter->ops & DRM_BRIDGE_OP_UPSTREAM_FIRST) > + iter = limit; > > if (iter == bridge) > break; > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h > index f27b4060faa2..523ec9d8f3f8 100644 > --- a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h > +++ b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h > @@ -725,6 +725,14 @@ enum drm_bridge_ops { >* this flag shall implement the &drm_bridge_funcs->get_modes callback. >*/ > DRM_BRIDGE_OP_MODES = BIT(3), > + /** > + * @DRM_BRIDGE_OP_UPSTREAM_FIRST: The bridge can requires s/can // > + * that the upstream node pre_enable is called before its pre_enable, s/node/bridge/ ? > + * and conversely for post_disables. This is most frequently a s/post_disables/post_disable/ Bonus points if you use the correct markup to link to those operations. > + * requirement for DSI devices which need the host to be initialised > + * before them. > + */ > + DRM_BRIDGE_OP_UPSTREAM_FIRST = BIT(4), > }; > > /** -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH 0/2] DSI host and peripheral initialisation ordering

2022-02-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
/2021-December/333908.html > > [4] > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2021-October/328476.html > > [5] > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2021-October/325853.html > > [6] > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2022-February/341852.html > > [7] https://github.com/6by9/linux/tree/drm-misc-next-vc4_dsi > > [8] https://github.com/6by9/linux/tree/rpi-5.15.y-sn65dsi83 > > > > > > Dave Stevenson (2): > >drm: Introduce DRM_BRIDGE_OP_UPSTREAM_FIRST to alter bridge init order > >drm/bridge: Document the expected behaviour of DSI host controllers > > > > Documentation/gpu/drm-kms-helpers.rst | 7 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c | 235 > > ++ > > include/drm/drm_bridge.h | 8 ++ > > 3 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: changes to rcar-du driver resulting from drm_writeback_connector structure changes

2022-02-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Dmitry, On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 06:32:50AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 07:59, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 05:40:29PM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote: > > > Hi Laurent > > > > > > Gentle reminder on this. > &

Re: [PATCH] drm: rcar-du: Fix CRTC timings when CMM is used

2022-02-22 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Kieran, On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 12:58:25PM +, Kieran Bingham wrote: > Quoting Laurent Pinchart (2021-11-29 22:28:13) > > When the CMM is enabled, an offset of 25 pixels must be subtracted from > > the HDS (horizontal display start) and HDE (horizontal display end) > &g

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Properly undo autosuspend

2022-02-22 Thread Laurent Pinchart
his be solved in the runtime PM framework instead ? pm_runtime_disable() could disable auto-suspend. If there are legitimate use cases for disabling runtime PM temporarily without disabling auto-suspend, then a new function designed specifically for remove() that would take care of cleaning everything up could be another option. > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Properly undo autosuspend

2022-02-23 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Doug, On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 07:43:27AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 9:08 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 11:44:54PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 11:19 PM Douglas Anderson wrote: > > > &g

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge_connector: enable HPD by default if supported

2022-02-23 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hello, On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 04:17:22PM +, Kieran Bingham wrote: > Quoting Laurent Pinchart (2021-12-29 23:44:29) > > On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 09:31:51AM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote: > > > Hotplug events reported by bridge drivers over drm_bridge_hpd_notify() > &

Re: [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: mxsfb: Add compatible for i.MX8MP

2022-02-27 Thread Laurent Pinchart
er layout compared to all previous LCDIF > variants. The new LCDIFv3 also supports 36bit address space. However, > except for the complete bit reshuffling, this is still LCDIF and it still > works like one. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > Cc: Alexander Stein > Cc: Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: changes to rcar-du driver resulting from drm_writeback_connector structure changes

2022-02-28 Thread Laurent Pinchart
DRM_CLIENT_CAP_WRITEBACK_CONNECTORS capability to get the writeback connectors exposed by the kernel, but more than that, a large refactoring is then often needed to chase all code paths that assume a connector is a connector. I'm afraid the same applies to the kernel. Drivers that don&#

Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: changes to rcar-du driver resulting from drm_writeback_connector structure changes

2022-02-28 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 10:27:59AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote: > On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 7:41 AM Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Wed, 02 Feb 2022, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 03:15:03PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > >> On Wed, 02 Fe

Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: changes to rcar-du driver resulting from drm_writeback_connector structure changes

2022-02-28 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Dmitry, On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:07:41AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 11:00, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 05:10:06AM +, Kandpal, Suraj wrote: > > > Hi Abhinav, > > > > > > > Based on the discus

Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: changes to rcar-du driver resulting from drm_writeback_connector structure changes

2022-02-28 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Jani, On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:09:15PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 28 Feb 2022, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 10:27:59AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 7:41 AM Jani Nikula wrote: > >> > On Wed, 02 Feb 2022, Laure

Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: changes to rcar-du driver resulting from drm_writeback_connector structure changes

2022-02-28 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hello, On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:28:27PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:09:15PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2022, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 10:27:59AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote: > > >> On We

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Another pass removing cases of 'allOf' containing a '$ref'

2022-03-01 Thread Laurent Pinchart
braham I > Cc: Vinod Koul > Cc: Sebastian Reichel > Cc: Bjorn Andersson > Cc: Mathieu Poirier > Cc: Mark Brown > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Cc: linux-in..

Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: changes to rcar-du driver resulting from drm_writeback_connector structure changes

2022-03-02 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Abhinav, On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 10:28:03AM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote: > On 2/28/2022 5:42 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:28:27PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:09:15PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > >>>

Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: display: bridge: renesas, lvds: Document r8a77961 bindings

2022-03-03 Thread Laurent Pinchart
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 06:00:08PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 5:47 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 08:23:09AM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote: > > > Document the R-Car M3-W+ (R8A77961) SoC in the R-Car LVDS enco

[GIT PULL FOR v5.18] R-Car DU misc improvements

2022-03-03 Thread Laurent Pinchart
A77961) SoC - R-Car DU misc fixes and cleanups -------- Laurent Pinchart (3): drm: rcar-du: Drop LVDS device tree backward compatibility drm: rcar-du: Don't select VSP1 sink on Gen3 drm: rcar-du: Don't restart gro

Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: display: bridge: renesas, lvds: Document r8a77961 bindings

2022-03-04 Thread Laurent Pinchart
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 06:00:08PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 5:47 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 08:23:09AM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote: > > &

Re: [RFC PATCH 10/11] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Support DisplayPort (non-eDP) mode

2022-03-04 Thread Laurent Pinchart
n't have any background about why they are different other than what > looks to be intentionally making the two things incompatible. I think it was done for DRM purpose, to prevent signals meant for a panel to be connected to a device that could capture video from a DP source. > ...so

Re: [PATCH v12 3/4] drm/bridge: anx7625: add MIPI DPI input feature

2022-03-06 Thread Laurent Pinchart
goto unregister_bridge; > + if (!platform->pdata.is_dpi) { > + ret = anx7625_attach_dsi(platform); > + if (ret) { > + DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "Fail to attach to dsi : %d\n", ret); > + goto unregister_bridge; > + } > } > > DRM_DEV_DEBUG_DRIVER(dev, "probe done\n"); > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.h > b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.h > index 6dcf64c703f9..3ef1d8f4e575 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.h > @@ -141,12 +141,20 @@ > #define HORIZONTAL_BACK_PORCH_H 0x22 /* Bit[7:4] are reserved */ > > / END of I2C Address 0x72 */ > + > +/***/ > +/* Register definition of device address 0x7a */ > +#define DP_TX_SWING_REG_CNT 0x14 > +#define DP_TX_LANE0_SWING_REG0 0x00 > +#define DP_TX_LANE1_SWING_REG0 0x14 > +/ END of I2C Address 0x7a */ > + > /***/ > /* Register definition of device address 0x7e */ > > #define I2C_ADDR_7E_FLASH_CONTROLLER 0x7E > > -#define FLASH_LOAD_STA 0x05 > +#define FLASH_LOAD_STA 0x05 > #define FLASH_LOAD_STA_CHK BIT(7) > > #define XTAL_FRQ_SEL0x3F > @@ -349,12 +357,20 @@ struct s_edid_data { > > /* Display End */ > > +#define MAX_LANES_SUPPORT4 > + > struct anx7625_platform_data { > struct gpio_desc *gpio_p_on; > struct gpio_desc *gpio_reset; > struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[3]; > struct drm_bridge *panel_bridge; > int intp_irq; > + int is_dpi; > + int mipi_lanes; > + int dp_lane0_swing_reg_cnt; > + int lane0_reg_data[DP_TX_SWING_REG_CNT]; > + int dp_lane1_swing_reg_cnt; > + int lane1_reg_data[DP_TX_SWING_REG_CNT]; > u32 low_power_mode; > struct device_node *mipi_host_node; > }; -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

[PATCH v2 0/3] dt-bindings: Add macros for video interface bus types

2022-03-06 Thread Laurent Pinchart
. Let's discuss this in [1], I'll update this series and rebase it on v5.18-rc1 once released based on the outcome of the discussion. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/yitruicikyxs3...@pendragon.ideasonboard.com/ Laurent Pinchart (3): dt-bindings: media: Add macros for video interface bus

[PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: Use new video interface bus type macros in examples

2022-03-06 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Now that a header exists with macros for the media interface bus-type values, replace hardcoding numerical constants with the corresponding macros in the DT binding examples. Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart --- Changes since v1: - Rename PARALLEL to BT601 --- .../devicetree/bindings/display

[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: media: Add macros for video interface bus types

2022-03-06 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Add a new dt-bindings/media/video-interfaces.h header that defines macros corresponding to the bus types from media/video-interfaces.yaml. This allows avoiding hardcoded constants in device tree sources. Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart --- Changes since v1: - Dual-license under GPL-2.0-only or

[PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: Use new media bus type macros

2022-03-06 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Now that a header exists with macros for the media interface bus-type values, replace hardcoding numerical constants with the corresponding macros in the DT sources. Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart --- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-14x14-evk.dtsi | 4 +++- arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: media: Add macros for video interface bus types

2022-03-06 Thread Laurent Pinchart
On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 07:39:03PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Add a new dt-bindings/media/video-interfaces.h header that defines > macros corresponding to the bus types from media/video-interfaces.yaml. > This allows avoiding hardcoded constants in device tree sources. > >

Re: [PATCH v12 3/4] drm/bridge: anx7625: add MIPI DPI input feature

2022-03-06 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hello Xin, On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 11:22:48AM +0800, Xin Ji wrote: > On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 07:13:30PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hello Xin, > > > > (Question for Rob below, and I'm afraid this is urgent as we need to > > merge a fix in v5.17). > &

Re: [PATCH v12 3/4] drm/bridge: anx7625: add MIPI DPI input feature

2022-03-06 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hello Xin, On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 12:32:49PM +0800, Xin Ji wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 05:30:09AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 11:22:48AM +0800, Xin Ji wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 07:13:30PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

Re: [PATCH v12 3/4] drm/bridge: anx7625: add MIPI DPI input feature

2022-03-06 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hello Xin, On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 01:09:45PM +0800, Xin Ji wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 06:47:44AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 12:32:49PM +0800, Xin Ji wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 05:30:09AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >

Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Revert vendor property from anx7625 bindings

2022-03-07 Thread Laurent Pinchart
dts: mt8183: jacuzzi: Fix bus properties in anx's DSI > endpoint" If this is enough to avoid the wrong bus-type becoming an ABI, even if the corresponding driver support isn't reverted, then, for the whole series, Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > .../display/bridge/anal

Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] Revert "dt-bindings:drm/bridge:anx7625:add vendor define"

2022-03-07 Thread Laurent Pinchart
process. We may end up using those values, but I think it should be discussed and not rushed in v5.17 if possible. > > > -default: 1 > > > - > > > - data-lanes: true > > > + Video port for MIPI DSI input. > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm: Add drm_fixed_16_16 helper

2021-09-01 Thread Laurent Pinchart
6_16 from_fraction() then, but then the same logic should possibly be replicated to ensure optimal precision. I wonder if it wouldn't be best to simply use drm_fixp_from_fraction() and shift the result right by 16 bits. > +{ > + return (mult << 16) / div; > +} > + > #endif -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: renesas,du: Provide bindings for r8a779a0

2021-09-01 Thread Laurent Pinchart
clock in DT. > > Is this acceptable? or is there further issues there? Could we handle that on the driver side, like we do for H1 by not setting RCAR_DU_FEATURE_CRTC_IRQ_CLOCK ? We would probably need to split that flag in two, as there are two interrupts. It's a bit annoying not knowing what the MSTP bits do exactly, we've modelled them as gates for the functional clock, but maybe in cases like this one the mapping isn't fully correct, I'm not sure. > > And what about DU_DOTCLKIN? > > This thread has already discussed this with Laurent, and I concur - > There doesn't appear to be any relevant reference to DU_DOTCLKIN on the > DU side. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm: Add drm_fixed_16_16 helper

2021-09-01 Thread Laurent Pinchart
r helpers if it's better..? If the behaviour changes this goes > from a trivial cleanup to a much more invasive changeset. I don't own > half of the hardware here. But except for msm which may need testing, all other drivers use the existing FRAC_16_16() macro with constant arguments, so it shouldn't be difficult to ensure that the new function gives the same results. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: DSI Bridge switching

2021-10-08 Thread Laurent Pinchart
sure about > bridges added to bridge chain - you need to inspect all opses to ensure > it can be done safely. > > And the main issue: Daniel does not like it :) Neither do I :-) Could it be handled with two DRM connectors that are mutually exclusive ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] drm/bridge: lvds-codec: Add support for LVDS data mapping select

2021-10-10 Thread Laurent Pinchart
n > > case data-mapping is not present, do nothing, since there are still > > legacy bindings which do not specify this property. > > > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > > Cc: Sam Ravnborg > > To:

Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] drm: mxsfb: Print failed bus format in hex

2021-10-11 Thread Laurent Pinchart
dev_err(drm->dev, "Unknown media bus format %d\n", bus_format); > + dev_err(drm->dev, "Unknown media bus format 0x%x\n", > bus_format); I may have gone for 0x%04x as current media bus formats all hold in 16 bits, but it's not big deal. Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > break; > } > -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Add vcc supply regulator support

2021-10-12 Thread Laurent Pinchart
65dsi83_remove(struct i2c_client *client) > mipi_dsi_device_unregister(ctx->dsi); > drm_bridge_remove(&ctx->bridge); > of_node_put(ctx->host_node); > + regulator_disable(ctx->vcc); > > return 0; > } -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: Ignore -EPROBE_DEFER when bridge attach fails

2021-10-12 Thread Laurent Pinchart
l should happen at probe time, way before the bridge is attached. Doing otherwise is a step in the wrong direction in my opinion, and something we'll end up regretting when we'll feel the pain it inflicts. > return ret; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_bridge_attach); -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: (EXT) Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Add vcc supply regulator support

2021-10-13 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Alexander, On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 08:59:22AM +, Alexander Stein wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 10:43 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 08:48:43AM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote: > > > VCC needs to be enabled before releasing the enable GPIO. >

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Add vcc supply bindings

2021-10-13 Thread Laurent Pinchart
supply property even though it was > working fine for them before. > > You handle that nicely in the code, but you can't make that new property > required. We can't make it required in the driver, but can't we make it required in the bindings ? This indicates that all new DTs need to set the property. We also need to mass-patch the in-tree DTs to avoid validation failures, but apart from that, I don't see any issue. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] drm/rcar: stop using 'imply' for dependencies

2021-10-15 Thread Laurent Pinchart
is still open, but this one is needed as a bug fix regardless of > the rest. This looks a bit complicated, but at the same time probably as clean as it can get with the existing Kconfig grammar. I don't believe the needs of the rcar-du driver are really exotic, so better support for this

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Add vcc supply bindings

2021-10-15 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Maxime, On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 09:41:10AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:37:47PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 09:47:22AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 08:48:42AM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: xilinx: Fix example with psgtr

2021-10-18 Thread Laurent Pinchart
eam. That's why fix example by using only 4 cells > instead of 5. > > Fixes: e7c7970a678d ("dt-bindings: display: xlnx: Add ZynqMP DP subsystem > bindings") > Signed-off-by: Michal Simek Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > --- > > .../devicetree/binding

Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/meson: split out encoder from meson_dw_hdmi

2021-10-18 Thread Laurent Pinchart
a_equal(old_conn_state, > conn_state)) > + crtc_state->mode_changed = true; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct drm_bridge_funcs meson_encoder_hdmi_bridge_funcs = { > + .attach = meson_encoder_hdmi_attach, > + .enable = meson_encoder_hdmi_enable, > + .disable = meson_encoder_hdmi_disable, > + .mode_valid = meson_encoder_hdmi_mode_valid, > + .atomic_enable = meson_encoder_hdmi_atomic_enable, > + .atomic_get_input_bus_fmts = meson_encoder_hdmi_get_inp_bus_fmts, > + .atomic_check = meson_encoder_hdmi_atomic_check, > + .atomic_duplicate_state = drm_atomic_helper_bridge_duplicate_state, > + .atomic_destroy_state = drm_atomic_helper_bridge_destroy_state, > + .atomic_reset = drm_atomic_helper_bridge_reset, > +}; > + > +int meson_encoder_hdmi_init(struct meson_drm *priv) > +{ > + struct meson_encoder_hdmi *meson_encoder_hdmi; > + struct device_node *remote; > + int ret; > + > + meson_encoder_hdmi = devm_kzalloc(priv->dev, > sizeof(*meson_encoder_hdmi), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!meson_encoder_hdmi) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + /* HDMI Transceiver Bridge */ > + remote = of_graph_get_remote_node(priv->dev->of_node, 1, 0); > + if (!remote) { > + dev_err(priv->dev, "HDMI transceiver device is disabled"); > + return 0; > + } > + > + meson_encoder_hdmi->next_bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(remote); > + if (!meson_encoder_hdmi->next_bridge) { > + dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to find HDMI transceiver bridge\n"); > + return -EPROBE_DEFER; > + } > + > + /* HDMI Encoder Bridge */ > + meson_encoder_hdmi->bridge.funcs = &meson_encoder_hdmi_bridge_funcs; > + meson_encoder_hdmi->bridge.of_node = priv->dev->of_node; > + meson_encoder_hdmi->bridge.type = DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_HDMIA; > + > + drm_bridge_add(&meson_encoder_hdmi->bridge); > + > + meson_encoder_hdmi->priv = priv; > + > + /* Encoder */ > + ret = drm_simple_encoder_init(priv->drm, &meson_encoder_hdmi->encoder, > + DRM_MODE_ENCODER_TMDS); Ideally this should be moved one level up, as the bridge side shouldn't care about drm_encoder. Creating the encoder, attaching to the bridge and creating the connector using the drm bridge connector helper all belong together in the display controller driver outside of bridge code, and once all encoders have been converted to the new model, it can be done unconditionally without caring about the type of bridge. This can be done on top of this series. > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to init HDMI encoder: %d\n", ret); > + return ret; > + } > + > + meson_encoder_hdmi->encoder.possible_crtcs = BIT(0); > + > + /* Attach HDMI Encoder Bridge to Encoder */ > + ret = drm_bridge_attach(&meson_encoder_hdmi->encoder, > &meson_encoder_hdmi->bridge, NULL, 0); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to attach bridge: %d\n", ret); > + return ret; > + } > + > + /* > + * We should have now in place: > + * encoder->[hdmi encoder bridge]->[dw-hdmi bridge]->[dw-hdmi connector] > + */ > + > + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "HDMI encoder initialized\n"); > + > + return 0; > +} > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_encoder_hdmi.h > b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_encoder_hdmi.h > new file mode 100644 > index ..ed19494f0956 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_encoder_hdmi.h > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2021 BayLibre, SAS > + * Author: Neil Armstrong > + */ > + > +#ifndef __MESON_ENCODER_HDMI_H > +#define __MESON_ENCODER_HDMI_H > + > +int meson_encoder_hdmi_init(struct meson_drm *priv); > + > +#endif /* __MESON_ENCODER_HDMI_H */ -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Add vcc supply bindings

2021-10-18 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Maxime, On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 05:20:13PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 05:34:59AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 09:41:10AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:37:47PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wro

Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: display: bridge: lvds-codec: Document pixel data sampling edge select

2021-10-18 Thread Laurent Pinchart
by display timings but rather the same as used by > media, to define the pixel data sampling edge. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Cc: Rob Herring > Cc: Sam Ravnborg > Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org > To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > -

Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: display: bridge: lvds-codec: Document pixel data sampling edge select

2021-10-18 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Marek, On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 09:47:13PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 10/18/21 8:08 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > [...] > > >> diff --git > >> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lvds-codec.yaml > >> b/Documentation/devicetree/

Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: display: bridge: lvds-codec: Document pixel data sampling edge select

2021-10-18 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Marek, On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 12:18:11AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 10/18/21 9:57 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi, > > >>>> diff --git > >>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lvds-codec.yaml > >>>> b/Documen

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Add vcc supply bindings

2021-10-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Maxime, On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 09:37:28AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 08:48:52PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 05:20:13PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 05:34:59AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wro

Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] of: Make of_graph_get_port_by_id take a const device_node

2021-10-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
; @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static inline int of_graph_get_endpoint_count(const struct > device_node *np) > } > > static inline struct device_node *of_graph_get_port_by_id( > - struct device_node *node, u32 id) > + const struct device_node *node, u32 id) > { > return NULL; > } -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: Fix the bridge chain order for pre_enable / post_disable

2021-10-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
else if (bridge->funcs->post_disable) { > - bridge->funcs->post_disable(bridge); > + iter->funcs->atomic_post_disable(iter, > + old_bridge_state); > + } else if (iter->funcs->post_disable) { > + iter->funcs->post_disable(iter); > } > + > + if (iter == bridge) > + break; > } > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_bridge_chain_post_disable); -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] of: Make of_graph_get_port_by_id take a const device_node

2021-10-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Maxime, On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 09:48:43AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 03:02:13PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:42:28AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > of_graph_get_port_by_id doesn't modify the device_node po

Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] dt-bindings: display: sun4i: Add LVDS Dual-Link property

2021-10-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
ve a dual-link LVDS > + output. Should this be expanded to indicate that the property shall be set in both TCON instances ? Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > + >ports: > $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports > -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/bridge: ps8640: Use atomic variants of drm_bridge_funcs

2021-10-22 Thread Laurent Pinchart
> Cc: Jitao Shi > Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra > Cc: Philip Chen > Cc: Andrzej Hajda > Cc: Neil Armstrong > Cc: Robert Foss > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Cc: Jonas Karlman > Cc: Jernej Skrabec > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c | 14 -- > 1

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/bridge: ps8640: Use atomic variants of drm_bridge_funcs

2021-10-22 Thread Laurent Pinchart
default implementations of some operations, without any dependency on other components. The atomic state helpers fall in this category, they implement .atomic_* operations of the drm_*_funcs structures, not drm_*_helper_funcs. It could make sense to move them to the DRM core. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/bridge: ps8640: Use atomic variants of drm_bridge_funcs

2021-10-22 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Sam, On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 09:32:08PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 09:42:37PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 07:13:58PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > Hi Laurent, > > > > > > > From a quick l

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: Fix the bridge chain order for pre_enable / post_disable

2021-10-25 Thread Laurent Pinchart
idge, &encoder->bridge_chain, chain_node) { > >> - if (bridge->funcs->atomic_post_disable) { > >> + list_for_each_entry_reverse(iter, &encoder->bridge_chain, chain_node) { > >> + if (iter->funcs->atomic_post_disable) { > >>struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state; > >> > >>old_bridge_state = > >>drm_atomic_get_old_bridge_state(old_state, > >> - bridge); > >> + iter); > >>if (WARN_ON(!old_bridge_state)) > >>return; > >> > >> - bridge->funcs->atomic_post_disable(bridge, > >> - old_bridge_state); > >> - } else if (bridge->funcs->post_disable) { > >> - bridge->funcs->post_disable(bridge); > >> + iter->funcs->atomic_post_disable(iter, > >> + old_bridge_state); > >> + } else if (iter->funcs->post_disable) { > >> + iter->funcs->post_disable(iter); > >>} > >> + > >> + if (iter == bridge) > >> + break; > > > > I cannot see why this is needed, we are at the end of the list here > > anyway. > > > >>} > >> } > >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_bridge_chain_post_disable); -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH] drm: bridge: fix unmet dependency on DRM_KMS_HELPER for DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE

2021-10-25 Thread Laurent Pinchart
NS_DSI > config DRM_CHIPONE_ICN6211 > tristate "Chipone ICN6211 MIPI-DSI/RGB Converter bridge" > depends on OF > + select DRM_KMS_HELPER > select DRM_MIPI_DSI > select DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE > help -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH] drm: bridge: fix unmet dependency on DRM_KMS_HELPER for DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE

2021-10-25 Thread Laurent Pinchart
nd "depends" usually lead to be results. DRM_KMS_HELPER is a symbol that is mostly selected (I think there are a handful of occurrences of "depends", which should probably be fixed). > but most similar devices in this Kconfig file select DRM_KMS_HELPER. > Is there something different about DRM_CHIPONE_ICN6211 that I have missed? There isn't anything fundamentally different, but because DRM_KMS_HELPER is meant to be selected and not depended on, I think we should fix that for DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE, and it will fix the issue with DRM_CHIPONE_ICN6211. The dependency on the KMS helpers come from drm_panel_bridge.c, not from chipone-icn6211.c as far as I can tell, so it would also be more correct. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH v2] drm: bridge: fix unmet dependency on DRM_KMS_HELPER for DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE

2021-10-26 Thread Laurent Pinchart
> config DRM_CHIPONE_ICN6211 > tristate "Chipone ICN6211 MIPI-DSI/RGB Converter bridge" > depends on OF > + depends on DRM_KMS_HELPER With spaces replaced by tabs for indentation, Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > select DRM_MIPI_DSI > select DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE > help -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: Fix the bridge chain order for pre_enable / post_disable

2021-10-26 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Andrzej, On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 10:11:47PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > On 25.10.2021 13:21, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 01:00:10PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > >> On 21.10.2021 22:21, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > >>> On Thu, Oct 21, 202

Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: display: bridge: lvds-codec: Document pixel data sampling edge select

2021-10-26 Thread Laurent Pinchart
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 04:39:05PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 10/19/21 8:49 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Marek, > > Hi, > > >>>>>> diff --git > >>>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lvds-codec.yaml >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >