Hi Sam,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 08:18:55PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> The atomic variants of enable/disable in drm_bridge_funcs are the
> preferred operations - introduce these.
> 
> The ps8640 driver used the non-atomic variants of the 
> drm_bridge_chain_pre_enable/
> drm_bridge_chain_post_disable - convert these to the atomic variants.
> 
> v2:
>   - Added a few more people to cc: (Jitao, Enric, Philip) to increase
>     possibility to get test feedback
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <s...@ravnborg.org>
> Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <max...@cerno.tech>
> Cc: Jitao Shi <jitao....@mediatek.com>
> Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balle...@collabora.com>
> Cc: Philip Chen <philipc...@chromium.org>
> Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.ha...@samsung.com>
> Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com>
> Cc: Robert Foss <robert.f...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>
> Cc: Jonas Karlman <jo...@kwiboo.se>
> Cc: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skra...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c | 14 ++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
> index 3aaa90913bf8..0b620afe99c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
> @@ -376,7 +376,8 @@ static void ps8640_bridge_poweroff(struct ps8640 
> *ps_bridge)
>       ps_bridge->powered = false;
>  }
>  
> -static void ps8640_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +static void ps8640_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> +                                  struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>  {
>       struct ps8640 *ps_bridge = bridge_to_ps8640(bridge);
>       int ret;
> @@ -388,7 +389,8 @@ static void ps8640_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>               ps8640_bridge_poweroff(ps_bridge);
>  }
>  
> -static void ps8640_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +static void ps8640_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> +                                    struct drm_bridge_state 
> *old_bridge_state)
>  {
>       struct ps8640 *ps_bridge = bridge_to_ps8640(bridge);
>  
> @@ -489,7 +491,7 @@ static struct edid *ps8640_bridge_get_edid(struct 
> drm_bridge *bridge,
>        * EDID, for this chip, we need to do a full poweron, otherwise it will
>        * fail.
>        */
> -     drm_bridge_chain_pre_enable(bridge);
> +     drm_atomic_bridge_chain_pre_enable(bridge, connector->state->state);
>  
>       edid = drm_get_edid(connector,
>                           ps_bridge->page[PAGE0_DP_CNTL]->adapter);
> @@ -499,7 +501,7 @@ static struct edid *ps8640_bridge_get_edid(struct 
> drm_bridge *bridge,
>        * before, return the chip to its original power state.
>        */
>       if (poweroff)
> -             drm_bridge_chain_post_disable(bridge);
> +             drm_atomic_bridge_chain_post_disable(bridge, 
> connector->state->state);
>  
>       return edid;
>  }
> @@ -508,8 +510,8 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_funcs ps8640_bridge_funcs 
> = {
>       .attach = ps8640_bridge_attach,
>       .detach = ps8640_bridge_detach,
>       .get_edid = ps8640_bridge_get_edid,
> -     .post_disable = ps8640_post_disable,
> -     .pre_enable = ps8640_pre_enable,
> +     .atomic_post_disable = ps8640_atomic_post_disable,
> +     .atomic_pre_enable = ps8640_atomic_pre_enable,

Don't you also need to implement .atomic_duplicate_state(),
.atomic_destroy_state() and .atomic_reset() to use the atomic API ?

>  };
>  
>  static int ps8640_probe(struct i2c_client *client)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Reply via email to