Re: [PATCH] drm: introduce drm_can_sleep and use in intel/radeon drivers.

2012-01-06 Thread Dave Airlie
>> >> So we have a few places where the drm drivers would like to sleep to >> be nice to the system, mainly in the modesetting paths, but we also >> have two cases were atomic modesetting must take place, panic writing >> and kernel debugger. So provide a central inline to determine if a >> sleep o

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: GPU virtual memory support v22

2012-01-06 Thread Dave Airlie
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:11 AM, wrote: > From: Jerome Glisse > > Virtual address space are per drm client (opener of /dev/drm). > Client are in charge of virtual address space, they need to > map bo into it by calling DRM_RADEON_GEM_VA ioctl. > > First 16M of virtual address space is reserved by

Re: merge window closed

2012-01-06 Thread Dave Airlie
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:48:10AM +, Dave Airlie wrote: >> Hi >> >> So Linus has released, so really whats in -next is really it >> >> I've two things outstanding, >> the TTM/AGP fixes, from Jerome/Konrad, guys please cross-review

[Bug 44523] New: nexuiz perf regression since u_vbuf: implement another upload codepath which unrolls indices

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44523 Bug #: 44523 Summary: nexuiz perf regression since u_vbuf: implement another upload codepath which unrolls indices Classification: Unclassified Product: Mesa Version: git

[Bug 44032] drm-core-next + RV790 + ETQW = WARNING bisected

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44032 Andy Furniss changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: GPU virtual memory support v22

2012-01-06 Thread Christian König
On -10.01.-28163 20:59, alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote: [SNIP] #define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_RELOCS0x01 #define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_IB0x02 #define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_FLAGS 0x03 /* The first dword of RADEON_CHUNK_ID_FLAGS is a uint32 of these flags: */ #define RADEON_CS_KEEP_TILING_FLAGS 0x

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: GPU virtual memory support v22

2012-01-06 Thread Alex Deucher
2012/1/6 Christian König : > On -10.01.-28163 20:59, alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote: > [SNIP] > >>  #define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_RELOCS        0x01 >>  #define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_IB    0x02 >>  #define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_FLAGS 0x03 >> >>  /* The first dword of RADEON_CHUNK_ID_FLAGS is a uint32 of these flags: >>

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: GPU virtual memory support v22

2012-01-06 Thread Alex Deucher
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:11 AM,   wrote: >> From: Jerome Glisse >> >> Virtual address space are per drm client (opener of /dev/drm). >> Client are in charge of virtual address space, they need to >> map bo into it by calling DRM_RADEON_GEM_VA i

[PATCH 1/2] drm/radeon/kms: check if vm is supported in VA ioctl

2012-01-06 Thread alexdeucher
From: Alex Deucher Add a VM manager enabled field and use it to check if vm is enabled. Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher Cc: jgli...@redhat.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h |2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c |4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c | 10 +

[PATCH 2/2] drm/radeon/kms: remove pointless CS flags priority struct

2012-01-06 Thread alexdeucher
From: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher Cc: Christian König --- include/drm/radeon_drm.h |3 --- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/drm/radeon_drm.h b/include/drm/radeon_drm.h index 2a807a5..b55da40 100644 --- a/include/drm/radeon_drm.h +++ b/incl

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: GPU virtual memory support v22

2012-01-06 Thread Christian König
On 06.01.2012 15:12, Alex Deucher wrote: 2012/1/6 Christian König: On -10.01.-28163 20:59, alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote: [SNIP] #define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_RELOCS0x01 #define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_IB0x02 #define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_FLAGS 0x03 /* The first dword of RADEON_CHUNK_ID_FLAGS i

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: GPU virtual memory support v22

2012-01-06 Thread Alex Deucher
2012/1/6 Christian König : > On 06.01.2012 15:12, Alex Deucher wrote: >> >> 2012/1/6 Christian König: >>> >>> On -10.01.-28163 20:59, alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote: >>> [SNIP] >>>  #define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_RELOCS        0x01  #define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_IB    0x02  #define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_F

[git pull] dma-buf tree

2012-01-06 Thread Dave Airlie
Hi Linus, This isn't the drm merge, however a few projects have been working together on a buffer sharing mechanism for kernel drivers, the maim interested parties are the Linaro/ARM SoC folks, V4L, DRM, and fbdev. Sumit Semwal wrote the code, and its been reviewed on various lists a fair few t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: implement DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETROTATION

2012-01-06 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:10:43 -0800 Eric Anholt wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:16:23 -0200, przan...@gmail.com wrote: > > From: Paulo Zanoni > > > > This ioctl is used to signal the drivers that the screen is rotated, > > not to make the drivers rotate the screen. > > - add a driver-specific "

[Bug 44524] [radeon driver] Screen corruption when "Applications" has enough apps to have a scrollbar on Gnome Desktop

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44524 Michel Dänzer changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|xorg-driver-...@lists.x.org |dri-devel@lists.freedesktop

Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix ttm move notify callback

2012-01-06 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:14:10PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 07:53:13AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 13:31 -0500, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote: > > > From: Jerome Glisse > > > > > > ttm might call the move notify with null new mem placement, >

[Bug 44524] [radeon driver] Screen corruption when "Applications" has enough apps to have a scrollbar on Gnome Desktop

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44524 Michel Dänzer changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |7.11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs

Re: TTM and AGP conflicts

2012-01-06 Thread James Simmons
> >> You can achieve what you want by either adding a new domain so you would > >> have > >> system, vram, agp, pcidma and object can be bound to one and only one. Or > >> you > >> can hack your own agp ttm backend that could bind bo to agp or pci or > >> both at the same time depending on what

[Bug 43719] drm-core-next + AGP RV670 = Oops

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43719 Andy Furniss changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix ttm move notify callback

2012-01-06 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:14:10PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 07:53:13AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: >> > On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 13:31 -0500, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote: >> > > From: Jerome Glisse >> > >

[ANNOUNCE] libdrm 2.4.30

2012-01-06 Thread Eric Anholt
Here's a new release, featuring updated i915_drm.h for gen7 transform feedback, and intel_decode.c as a library API instead of being copied around between our various driver components. Chris Wilson (2): intel: Reset vma list upon purge tests/gem_flink: Check for MASTER before proceedi

Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix ttm move notify callback

2012-01-06 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 11:51:03AM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:14:10PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 07:53:13AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > >> > On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 1

[Bug 44536] New: [r300g] bisected - performance regression on 0ad

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44536 Bug #: 44536 Summary: [r300g] bisected - performance regression on 0ad Classification: Unclassified Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All)

Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix ttm move notify callback

2012-01-06 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 11:53:35AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 11:51:03AM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:14:10PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > >> On Fri, J

[Bug 30227] [RADEON:KMS:AGP:R300:PPC] random X freeze by a GPU lockup

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30227 --- Comment #12 from Michel Dänzer 2012-01-06 10:37:08 PST --- FWIW, http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-January/017932.html should increase the chance of recovering from a GPU lockup, or at least being able to reboot cleanly, o

Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix ttm move notify callback

2012-01-06 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> Still having difficulty to reproduce can you reproduce with the attached > printk debuging patch and provide the log (only few printk preceding the > oops or segfault are interesting). http://darnok.org/vga/move_notify-v212.log > > Cheers, > Jerome > >From 862e2cc6d35d85404ed24d24c5a5c49c5ef4

Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix ttm move notify callback

2012-01-06 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 02:52:49PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > Still having difficulty to reproduce can you reproduce with the attached > > printk debuging patch and provide the log (only few printk preceding the > > oops or segfault are interesting). > > http://darnok.org/vga/move_not

[Bug 44536] [r300g] bisected - performance regression on 0ad

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44536 --- Comment #1 from Marek Olšák 2012-01-06 13:54:57 PST --- If I revert that commit, Nexuiz will be slow again. I can't do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail beca

[Bug 44536] [r300g] bisected - performance regression on 0ad

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44536 Marek Olšák changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Drivers/DRI/r300|Drivers/Gallium/r300 -- Configure bugmail

[PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix ttm move notify callback

2012-01-06 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 13:31 -0500, j.glisse at gmail.com wrote: > From: Jerome Glisse > > ttm might call the move notify with null new mem placement, > properly handle this case inside nouveau move notify callback. This has been fixed already in a -next tree I sent to Dave. Ben. > > Signed-off-

[Bug 37724] r300g with HyperZ/Z compression: occlusion queries are messed up in ut2004 (regression, bisected)

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37724 --- Comment #14 from Marek Ol??k 2012-01-05 16:18:14 PST --- Well maybe not, I am not sure. I recall there was another bug with HiZ, which could be triggered by changing the depth function. The workaround was to flush the zbuffer cache when the

[Bug 43829] Resuming my AMD A4-300 based laptop leaves the screen black

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43829 --- Comment #1 from Joshua Roys 2012-01-05 17:21:16 PST --- Created attachment 55194 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55194 difference of `radeontool regmatch \*` from before and after suspend HP G4-1215DX with an A4-3300 AP

[Bug 43829] Resuming my AMD A4-3300 based laptop leaves the screen black

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43829 Joshua Roys changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Resuming my AMD A4-300 |Resuming my AMD A4-3300

[PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: add support for streamout

2012-01-06 Thread Marek Olšák
People can start using transform feedback on r6xx with this. Strict CS checking will be implemented later. Signed-off-by: Marek Ol??k --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen_cs.c | 104 +++-- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreend.h | 10 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/

[PATCH] drm: introduce drm_can_sleep and use in intel/radeon drivers.

2012-01-06 Thread Dave Airlie
>> >> So we have a few places where the drm drivers would like to sleep to >> be nice to the system, mainly in the modesetting paths, but we also >> have two cases were atomic modesetting must take place, panic writing >> and kernel debugger. So provide a central inline to determine if a >> sleep o

[PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: GPU virtual memory support v22

2012-01-06 Thread Dave Airlie
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:11 AM, wrote: > From: Jerome Glisse > > Virtual address space are per drm client (opener of /dev/drm). > Client are in charge of virtual address space, they need to > map bo into it by calling DRM_RADEON_GEM_VA ioctl. > > First 16M of virtual address space is reserved by

merge window closed

2012-01-06 Thread Dave Airlie
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:48:10AM +, Dave Airlie wrote: >> Hi >> >> So Linus has released, so really whats in -next is really it >> >> I've two things outstanding, >> the TTM/AGP fixes, from Jerome/Konrad, guys please cross-review

[Bug 44523] New: nexuiz perf regression since u_vbuf: implement another upload codepath which unrolls indices

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44523 Bug #: 44523 Summary: nexuiz perf regression since u_vbuf: implement another upload codepath which unrolls indices Classification: Unclassified Product: Mesa Version: git

[Bug 44032] drm-core-next + RV790 + ETQW = WARNING bisected

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44032 Andy Furniss changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: GPU virtual memory support v22

2012-01-06 Thread Christian König
On -10.01.-28163 20:59, alexdeucher at gmail.com wrote: [SNIP] > #define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_RELOCS 0x01 > #define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_IB 0x02 > #define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_FLAGS 0x03 > > /* The first dword of RADEON_CHUNK_ID_FLAGS is a uint32 of these flags: */ > #define RADEON_CS_KEEP_T

[PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: GPU virtual memory support v22

2012-01-06 Thread Alex Deucher
2012/1/6 Christian K?nig : > On -10.01.-28163 20:59, alexdeucher at gmail.com wrote: > [SNIP] > >> ?#define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_RELOCS ? ? ? ?0x01 >> ?#define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_IB ? ?0x02 >> ?#define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_FLAGS 0x03 >> >> ?/* The first dword of RADEON_CHUNK_ID_FLAGS is a uint32 of these flags:

[PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: GPU virtual memory support v22

2012-01-06 Thread Alex Deucher
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:11 AM, ? wrote: >> From: Jerome Glisse >> >> Virtual address space are per drm client (opener of /dev/drm). >> Client are in charge of virtual address space, they need to >> map bo into it by calling DRM_RADEON_GEM_VA i

[PATCH 1/2] drm/radeon/kms: check if vm is supported in VA ioctl

2012-01-06 Thread alexdeuc...@gmail.com
From: Alex Deucher Add a VM manager enabled field and use it to check if vm is enabled. Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher Cc: jglisse at redhat.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h |2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c |4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c | 10 ++

[PATCH 2/2] drm/radeon/kms: remove pointless CS flags priority struct

2012-01-06 Thread alexdeuc...@gmail.com
From: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher Cc: Christian K?nig --- include/drm/radeon_drm.h |3 --- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/drm/radeon_drm.h b/include/drm/radeon_drm.h index 2a807a5..b55da40 100644 --- a/include/drm/radeon_drm.h +++ b/incl

[PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: GPU virtual memory support v22

2012-01-06 Thread Christian König
On 06.01.2012 15:12, Alex Deucher wrote: > 2012/1/6 Christian K?nig: >> On -10.01.-28163 20:59, alexdeucher at gmail.com wrote: >> [SNIP] >> >>> #define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_RELOCS0x01 >>> #define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_IB0x02 >>> #define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_FLAGS 0x03 >>> >>> /* The first dwor

[PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: GPU virtual memory support v22

2012-01-06 Thread Alex Deucher
2012/1/6 Christian K?nig : > On 06.01.2012 15:12, Alex Deucher wrote: >> >> 2012/1/6 Christian K?nig: >>> >>> On -10.01.-28163 20:59, alexdeucher at gmail.com wrote: >>> [SNIP] >>> ?#define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_RELOCS ? ? ? ?0x01 ?#define RADEON_CHUNK_ID_IB ? ?0x02 ?#define RADEON_CHUNK_I

[git pull] dma-buf tree

2012-01-06 Thread Dave Airlie
Hi Linus, This isn't the drm merge, however a few projects have been working together on a buffer sharing mechanism for kernel drivers, the maim interested parties are the Linaro/ARM SoC folks, V4L, DRM, and fbdev. Sumit Semwal wrote the code, and its been reviewed on various lists a fair few t

[Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: implement DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETROTATION

2012-01-06 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:10:43 -0800 Eric Anholt wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:16:23 -0200, przanoni at gmail.com wrote: > > From: Paulo Zanoni > > > > This ioctl is used to signal the drivers that the screen is rotated, > > not to make the drivers rotate the screen. > > - add a driver-specifi

[Bug 44524] [radeon driver] Screen corruption when "Applications" has enough apps to have a scrollbar on Gnome Desktop

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44524 Michel D?nzer changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|xorg-driver-ati at lists.x.org |dri-devel at lists.freedesktop

[PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix ttm move notify callback

2012-01-06 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:14:10PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 07:53:13AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 13:31 -0500, j.glisse at gmail.com wrote: > > > From: Jerome Glisse > > > > > > ttm might call the move notify with null new mem placement

[Bug 44524] [radeon driver] Screen corruption when "Applications" has enough apps to have a scrollbar on Gnome Desktop

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44524 Michel D?nzer changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |7.11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs

TTM and AGP conflicts

2012-01-06 Thread James Simmons
> >> You can achieve what you want by either adding a new domain so you would > >> have > >> system, vram, agp, pcidma and object can be bound to one and only one. Or > >> you > >> can hack your own agp ttm backend that could bind bo to agp or pci or > >> both at the same time depending on what

[Bug 43719] drm-core-next + AGP RV670 = Oops

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43719 Andy Furniss changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix ttm move notify callback

2012-01-06 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:14:10PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 07:53:13AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: >> > On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 13:31 -0500, j.glisse at gmail.com wrote: >> > > From: Jerome Glisse >> >

[ANNOUNCE] libdrm 2.4.30

2012-01-06 Thread Eric Anholt
4bc libdrm-2.4.30.tar.gz -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20120106/42734a81/attachment.pgp>

[PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix ttm move notify callback

2012-01-06 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 11:51:03AM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:14:10PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 07:53:13AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > >> > On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 1

[Bug 44536] New: [r300g] bisected - performance regression on 0ad

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44536 Bug #: 44536 Summary: [r300g] bisected - performance regression on 0ad Classification: Unclassified Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All)

[PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix ttm move notify callback

2012-01-06 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 11:53:35AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 11:51:03AM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:14:10PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > >> On Fri, J

[PATCH] TTM-DEBUG-PRINTK

2012-01-06 Thread Jerome Glisse
--- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c index 724b41a..326b64a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nou

[Bug 30227] [RADEON:KMS:AGP:R300:PPC] random X freeze by a GPU lockup

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30227 --- Comment #12 from Michel D?nzer 2012-01-06 10:37:08 PST --- FWIW, http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-January/017932.html should increase the chance of recovering from a GPU lockup, or at least being able to reboot cleanly, o

[PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix ttm move notify callback

2012-01-06 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> Still having difficulty to reproduce can you reproduce with the attached > printk debuging patch and provide the log (only few printk preceding the > oops or segfault are interesting). http://darnok.org/vga/move_notify-v212.log > > Cheers, > Jerome > >From 862e2cc6d35d85404ed24d24c5a5c49c5ef4

[PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix ttm move notify callback

2012-01-06 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 02:52:49PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > Still having difficulty to reproduce can you reproduce with the attached > > printk debuging patch and provide the log (only few printk preceding the > > oops or segfault are interesting). > > http://darnok.org/vga/move_not

[Bug 44536] [r300g] bisected - performance regression on 0ad

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44536 --- Comment #1 from Marek Ol??k 2012-01-06 13:54:57 PST --- If I revert that commit, Nexuiz will be slow again. I can't do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail bec

[Bug 44536] [r300g] bisected - performance regression on 0ad

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44536 Marek Ol??k changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Drivers/DRI/r300|Drivers/Gallium/r300 -- Configure bugmail