https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34929
--- Comment #6 from Fabio Pedretti 2011-03-04 02:34:24
PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Come on, you cannot decently compare performance when running under GDB...
> GDB has its own thread overhead
The point is that on my system, for whatever
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34843
--- Comment #13 from Christian König 2011-03-04
07:03:20 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=44128)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=44128
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=34843&attachment=44128
Possible fix
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34843
Christian König changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44128|0 |1
is obsolete|
On Don, 2011-03-03 at 17:34 -0600, Ilija Hadzic wrote:
>
> Now the problem is that DRM_IOCTL_WAIT_VBLANK only understands primary
> and secondary crtc and everything that is not crtc-0 is considered
> secondary. Then in the kernel, drm module maps the secondary flag to
> crtc 1, but that is a di
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25052
--- Comment #18 from Elmar Stellnberger 2011-03-04
15:51:44 ---
Well; I have asked a bit around and found out that KMS does already
work with the Intel 945 and Nvidia 7700 Go graphics cards while there
have been problems with ATI Radeon HD
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25052
--- Comment #19 from Elmar Stellnberger 2011-03-04
15:56:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=50072)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=50072)
lwfinger: hwinfo + monitor + Xorg.0.log
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kern
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25052
--- Comment #20 from Elmar Stellnberger 2011-03-04
15:57:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=50082)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=50082)
bmwiedemann: hwinfo + monitor.txt
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 16:51:28 -0800
From: Jesse Barnes
Subject: Re: vblank problem (and proposed fix) on crtc > 1
To: Ilija Hadzic
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Message-ID: <20110303165128.49515...@jbarnes-vaio.home>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
On Thu, 3 Mar 201
On Fre, 2011-03-04 at 17:19 +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
>
> Maybe it would be even possible to slip the small kernel patch into
> 2.6.38-rc? It is rather a bugfix than a new feature.
Not really. The vblank ioctl never pretended to support more than 2
CRTCs, the bug is in the userspace code expec
On Fre, 2011-03-04 at 17:24 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fre, 2011-03-04 at 17:19 +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
> >
> > Maybe it would be even possible to slip the small kernel patch into
> > 2.6.38-rc? It is rather a bugfix than a new feature.
>
> Not really. The vblank ioctl never pretended
On Mar 4, 2011, at 5:24 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fre, 2011-03-04 at 17:19 +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
Maybe it would be even possible to slip the small kernel patch into
2.6.38-rc? It is rather a bugfix than a new feature.
Not really. The vblank ioctl never pretended to support more than
Alex, can you confirm that the revert of 951f3512dba5 plus the
one-liner patch from Takashi that Indan quoted also works for you?
Linus
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Indan Zupancic wrote:
>
> So please revert my patch and apply Takashi Iwai's, which fixes the
> most immediate bu
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19372
Benjamin Scherrer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||realhang...@web.de
--- Comment #5
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19372
Florian Mickler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19372
Florian Mickler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: https
On Fri, March 4, 2011 19:47, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Alex, can you confirm that the revert of 951f3512dba5 plus the
> one-liner patch from Takashi that Indan quoted also works for you?
>
> Linus
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Indan Zupancic wrote:
>>
>> So please revert my patc
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29502
Florian Mickler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
Resolution|PATCH_ALREAD
Indan Zupancic wrote:
> What I don't understand is how BIOS makers could know about those bits.
They have relationships with Intel since 30 years, ie. they get what
they need in one form or other.
//Peter
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.free
(this is a cumulative response to all comments that came in on this
thread).
My opinion is that extending the existing ioctl is better than introducing
the new one given that they will be doing the same thing. Also there are
fewer kernel changes so it's safer (it opens fewer opportunities to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29363
--- Comment #29 from Hannes 2011-03-04
18:16:56 PST ---
Thanks for your help.
Indeed there was an issue, where the LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH was adjusted and it was
correct(pointing at gallium) for 64bit, but wrong for 32bit. Since all the
diagnosis a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29363
--- Comment #30 from Hannes 2011-03-04
18:49:38 PST ---
Hm, just reading through the output of wine after running the game, I get
exactly the same error as reported here orginally:
"r300 VP: Compiler error:
Vertex program has too many instructi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34843
Rafael Monica changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
Hello,
On Wed, February 23, 2011 02:09, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Tino Keitel wrote:
>>
>> I just tried 2.6.38-rc6 on my ThinkPad X61s without any other DRM
>> related patches, and my backlight issue is gone.
>
> I applied Indan's fix in -rc6 (commit 951f3512dba5),
Iwai
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:19:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix calculation of backlight value in combined mode
The commit a95735569312f2ab0c80425e2cd1e5cb0b4e1870
drm/i915: Refactor panel backlight controls
causes a regression for GM45 that is using the combined mode for
controllin
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34929
--- Comment #6 from Fabio Pedretti 2011-03-04 02:34:24
PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Come on, you cannot decently compare performance when running under GDB...
> GDB has its own thread overhead
The point is that on my system, for whatever
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34843
--- Comment #13 from Christian K?nig 2011-03-04
07:03:20 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=44128)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=44128
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=34843&attachment=44128
Possible fix
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34843
Christian K?nig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44128|0 |1
is obsolete|
On Don, 2011-03-03 at 17:34 -0600, Ilija Hadzic wrote:
>
> Now the problem is that DRM_IOCTL_WAIT_VBLANK only understands primary
> and secondary crtc and everything that is not crtc-0 is considered
> secondary. Then in the kernel, drm module maps the secondary flag to
> crtc 1, but that is a di
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25052
--- Comment #18 from Elmar Stellnberger 2011-03-04
15:51:44 ---
Well; I have asked a bit around and found out that KMS does already
work with the Intel 945 and Nvidia 7700 Go graphics cards while there
have been problems with ATI Radeon HD
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25052
--- Comment #19 from Elmar Stellnberger 2011-03-04
15:56:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=50072)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=50072)
lwfinger: hwinfo + monitor + Xorg.0.log
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kern
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25052
--- Comment #20 from Elmar Stellnberger 2011-03-04
15:57:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=50082)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=50082)
bmwiedemann: hwinfo + monitor.txt
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 16:51:28 -0800
> From: Jesse Barnes
> Subject: Re: vblank problem (and proposed fix) on crtc > 1
> To: Ilija Hadzic
> Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> Message-ID: <20110303165128.495158c9 at jbarnes-vaio.home>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASC
On Fre, 2011-03-04 at 17:19 +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
>
> Maybe it would be even possible to slip the small kernel patch into
> 2.6.38-rc? It is rather a bugfix than a new feature.
Not really. The vblank ioctl never pretended to support more than 2
CRTCs, the bug is in the userspace code expec
On Fre, 2011-03-04 at 17:24 +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Fre, 2011-03-04 at 17:19 +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
> >
> > Maybe it would be even possible to slip the small kernel patch into
> > 2.6.38-rc? It is rather a bugfix than a new feature.
>
> Not really. The vblank ioctl never pretended
On Mar 4, 2011, at 5:24 PM, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Fre, 2011-03-04 at 17:19 +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
>>
>> Maybe it would be even possible to slip the small kernel patch into
>> 2.6.38-rc? It is rather a bugfix than a new feature.
>
> Not really. The vblank ioctl never pretended to support m
Alex, can you confirm that the revert of 951f3512dba5 plus the
one-liner patch from Takashi that Indan quoted also works for you?
Linus
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Indan Zupancic wrote:
>
> So please revert my patch and apply Takashi Iwai's, which fixes the
> most immediate bu
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19372
Benjamin Scherrer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||realhangman at web.de
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19372
Florian Mickler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19372
Florian Mickler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: https
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29502
Florian Mickler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
Resolution|PATCH_ALREAD
(this is a cumulative response to all comments that came in on this
thread).
My opinion is that extending the existing ioctl is better than introducing
the new one given that they will be doing the same thing. Also there are
fewer kernel changes so it's safer (it opens fewer opportunities to s
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29363
--- Comment #29 from Hannes 2011-03-04
18:16:56 PST ---
Thanks for your help.
Indeed there was an issue, where the LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH was adjusted and it was
correct(pointing at gallium) for 64bit, but wrong for 32bit. Since all the
diagnosis a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29363
--- Comment #30 from Hannes 2011-03-04
18:49:38 PST ---
Hm, just reading through the output of wine after running the game, I get
exactly the same error as reported here orginally:
"r300 VP: Compiler error:
Vertex program has too many instructi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34843
Rafael Monica changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
44 matches
Mail list logo
