Daniel any estimation when you will have time to take a closer look?
Or could anybody else take another look at this?
Thanks,
Christian.
Am 11.02.22 um 13:49 schrieb Christian König:
Hi guys,
by now that should be a rather well known set of changes.
The basic idea is that instead of the fixe
Hi guys,
by now that should be a rather well known set of changes.
The basic idea is that instead of the fixed exclusive/shared classes we now
attach an usage to each fence in the dma_resv object describing how the
operation represented by the fence is using the resources protected by
the dma_res
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 10:11:20AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 22.12.21 um 23:17 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 03:39:52PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
> > > looks like this is going nowhere and you don't seem to have time to
> > > review.
> > >
Am 22.12.21 um 23:17 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 03:39:52PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
Hi Daniel,
looks like this is going nowhere and you don't seem to have time to review.
What can we do?
cc more people, you didn't cc any of the driver folks :-)
Well I've CCed more p
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 03:39:52PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> looks like this is going nowhere and you don't seem to have time to review.
>
> What can we do?
cc more people, you didn't cc any of the driver folks :-)
Also I did find some review before I disappeared, back on 1
Hi Daniel,
looks like this is going nowhere and you don't seem to have time to review.
What can we do?
Thanks,
Christian.
Am 07.12.21 um 13:33 schrieb Christian König:
Hi Daniel,
just a gentle ping that you wanted to take a look at this.
Not much changed compared to the last version, only a
Hi Daniel,
just a gentle ping that you wanted to take a look at this.
Not much changed compared to the last version, only a minor bugfix in
the dma_resv_get_singleton error handling.
Regards,
Christian.
Hi everyone,
compared to the last version I've dropped the pruning as suggested by
Maarten, split the new DMA_RESV_USAGE_* patches from the general
introduction as suggeted by Daniel and renamed OTEHRS to BOOKKEEP as
suggested by Pekka.
Please take a look and review,
Christian.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 03:20:45PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> as discussed before this set of patches completely rework the dma_resv
> semantic
> and spreads the new handling over all the existing drivers and users.
>
> First of all this drops the DA
Am 24.11.21 um 09:31 schrieb Pekka Paalanen:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 15:20:45 +0100
"Christian König" wrote:
Hi guys,
as discussed before this set of patches completely rework the dma_resv semantic
and spreads the new handling over all the existing drivers and users.
First of all this
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 15:20:45 +0100
"Christian König" wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> as discussed before this set of patches completely rework the dma_resv
> semantic
> and spreads the new handling over all the existing drivers and users.
>
> First of all this drops the D
Hi guys,
as discussed before this set of patches completely rework the dma_resv semantic
and spreads the new handling over all the existing drivers and users.
First of all this drops the DAG approach because it requires that every single
driver implements those relatively complicated rules
12 matches
Mail list logo
