Re: [PATCH RFC] backlight: pwm_bl: Read back PWM period from provider

2025-04-30 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hello Abel, On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 06:50:38PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > On 25-02-27 16:51:15, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 03:07:21PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > > > On 25-02-26 17:34:50, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:31:08PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrot

Re: [PATCH RFC] backlight: pwm_bl: Read back PWM period from provider

2025-04-30 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hello Daniel, On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 10:05:55AM +, Daniel Thompson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 04:06:47AM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:34:50PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:31:08PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > > > > The cur

Re: [PATCH RFC] backlight: pwm_bl: Read back PWM period from provider

2025-04-05 Thread Daniel Thompson
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 04:06:47AM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:34:50PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:31:08PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > > > The current implementation assumes that the PWM provider will be able to > > > meet the

Re: [PATCH RFC] backlight: pwm_bl: Read back PWM period from provider

2025-02-27 Thread Abel Vesa
On 25-02-27 16:51:15, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello Abel, > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 03:07:21PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > > On 25-02-26 17:34:50, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:31:08PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > > > > The current implementation assumes that the PWM prov

Re: [PATCH RFC] backlight: pwm_bl: Read back PWM period from provider

2025-02-27 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hello Abel, On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 03:07:21PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > On 25-02-26 17:34:50, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:31:08PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > > > The current implementation assumes that the PWM provider will be able to > > > meet the requested period, but

Re: [PATCH RFC] backlight: pwm_bl: Read back PWM period from provider

2025-02-27 Thread Abel Vesa
On 25-02-26 17:34:50, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:31:08PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > > The current implementation assumes that the PWM provider will be able to > > meet the requested period, but that is not always the case. Some PWM > > providers have limited HW

Re: [PATCH RFC] backlight: pwm_bl: Read back PWM period from provider

2025-02-26 Thread Sebastian Reichel
Hi, On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:34:50PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:31:08PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > > The current implementation assumes that the PWM provider will be able to > > meet the requested period, but that is not always the case. Some PWM > > providers hav

Re: [PATCH RFC] backlight: pwm_bl: Read back PWM period from provider

2025-02-26 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hello, On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:31:08PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > The current implementation assumes that the PWM provider will be able to > meet the requested period, but that is not always the case. Some PWM > providers have limited HW configuration capabilities and can only > provide a period