Hello, On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:31:08PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > The current implementation assumes that the PWM provider will be able to > meet the requested period, but that is not always the case. Some PWM > providers have limited HW configuration capabilities and can only > provide a period that is somewhat close to the requested one. This > simply means that the duty cycle requested might either be above the > PWM's maximum value or the 100% duty cycle is never reached.
If you request a state with 100% relative duty cycle you should get 100%
unless the hardware cannot do that. Which PWM hardware are you using?
Which requests are you actually doing that don't match your expectation?
> This could be easily fixed if the pwm_apply*() API family would allow
> overriding the period within the PWM state that's used for providing the
> duty cycle. But that is currently not the case.
I don't understand what you mean here.
> So easiest fix here is to read back the period from the PWM provider via
> the provider's ->get_state() op, if implemented, which should provide the
> best matched period. Do this on probe after the first ->pwm_apply() op has
> been done, which will allow the provider to determine the best match
> period based on available configuration knobs. From there on, the
> backlight will use the best matched period, since the driver's internal
> PWM state is now synced up with the one from provider.
> [...]
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> index
> 237d3d3f3bb1a6d713c5f6ec3198af772bf1268c..71a3e9cd8844095e85c01b194d7466978f1ca78e
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> @@ -525,6 +525,17 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> goto err_alloc;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * The actual period might differ from the requested one due to HW
> + * limitations, so sync up the period with one determined by the
> + * provider driver.
> + */
> + ret = pwm_get_state_hw(pb->pwm, &pb->pwm->state);
As a consumer you're not supposed to write to &pb->pwm->state. That's a
layer violation. Please call pwm_get_state_hw() with a struct pwm_state
that you own and save the relevant parts in your driver data.
> + if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get PWM HW state");
> + goto err_alloc;
> + }
> +
> memset(&props, 0, sizeof(struct backlight_properties));
>
> if (data->levels) {
Best regards
Uwe
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
