Hi Brian,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 09:34:10AM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:19:35AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:24:01AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> No implementation, no callers.
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:30:24AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 9:19 AM Laurent Pinchart
> wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:24:01AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> No implementation, no callers.
> >
> >
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:19:35AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:24:01AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > No implementation, no callers.
>
> The issue here isn't that the function is declared, but that it's not
> defined. J
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 9:19 AM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:24:01AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > No implementation, no callers.
>
> The issue here isn't that the function is declared, but that it's not
> defined. Jobs are leak
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:24:01AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> No implementation, no callers.
The issue here isn't that the function is declared, but that it's not
defined. Jobs are leaked when atomic commit fails (or when using test
commits). I'm working on