On 10/8/18 3:47 PM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> The NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_PCI_DEVICE case is missing a break statement and falls
> through to the following NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_BUS_TYPE case and may end up
> re-assigning the getparam->value to an undesired value. Fix this by adding
> in
On 1/29/19 2:49 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>
>
> On 10/8/18 3:47 PM, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King
>>
>> The NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_PCI_DEVICE case is missing a break statement and falls
>> through to the following NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_BUS_TYPE case and may end up
>> re-assigning the get