On 10/8/18 3:47 PM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
> 
> The NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_PCI_DEVICE case is missing a break statement and falls
> through to the following NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_BUS_TYPE case and may end up
> re-assigning the getparam->value to an undesired value. Fix this by adding
> in the missing break.
> 
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1460507 ("Missing break in switch")
> 
> Fixes: 359088d5b8ec ("drm/nouveau: remove trivial cases of nvxx_device() 
> usage")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>

Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gust...@embeddedor.com>

Friendly ping:

Who can take this?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
> index e67a471331b5..6ec745873bc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
> @@ -214,6 +214,7 @@ nouveau_abi16_ioctl_getparam(ABI16_IOCTL_ARGS)
>                       WARN_ON(1);
>                       break;
>               }
> +             break;
>       case NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_FB_SIZE:
>               getparam->value = drm->gem.vram_available;
>               break;
> 
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to