2017-09-28 15:08 GMT+08:00 Daniel Vetter :
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Chih-Wei Huang
> wrote:
>> 2017-09-26 13:26 GMT+08:00 Daniel Vetter :
>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 09:06:55AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On 09/25/2017 04:44 AM, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
> Hey Robert, thank you for
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
>
>
> On 09/28/2017 10:35 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>
>> On 09/28/2017 09:08 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Chih-Wei Huang
>>> wrote:
2017-09-26 13:26 GMT+08:00 Daniel Vetter :
>
> On Mon, Sep
On 09/28/2017 10:35 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On 09/28/2017 09:08 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
2017-09-26 13:26 GMT+08:00 Daniel Vetter :
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 09:06:55AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On 09/25/2017 04:44 AM, Chih-Wei Huang wr
On 09/28/2017 09:08 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Chih-Wei Huang
> wrote:
>> 2017-09-26 13:26 GMT+08:00 Daniel Vetter :
>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 09:06:55AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On 09/25/2017 04:44 AM, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
> Hey Robert, thank you fo
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
> 2017-09-26 13:26 GMT+08:00 Daniel Vetter :
>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 09:06:55AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>> On 09/25/2017 04:44 AM, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
>>> > Hey Robert, thank you for the reply.
>>> >
>>> > 2017-09-22 23:43 GMT+08:00 R
2017-09-26 13:26 GMT+08:00 Daniel Vetter :
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 09:06:55AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On 09/25/2017 04:44 AM, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
>> > Hey Robert, thank you for the reply.
>> >
>> > 2017-09-22 23:43 GMT+08:00 Robert Foss :
>> >> Hey Chih-Wei,
>> >> On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 10
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 09:06:55AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On 09/25/2017 04:44 AM, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
> > Hey Robert, thank you for the reply.
> >
> > 2017-09-22 23:43 GMT+08:00 Robert Foss :
> >> Hey Chih-Wei,
> >> On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 10:40 +0800, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
> >
> >> The and
On 09/25/2017 04:44 AM, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
> Hey Robert, thank you for the reply.
>
> 2017-09-22 23:43 GMT+08:00 Robert Foss :
>> Hey Chih-Wei,
>> On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 10:40 +0800, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
>
>> The android-ia project has supported using drm_hwcomposer and an
>> alternative hwcom
ndapally, Kalyan
Subject: Re: drm_hwcomposer moving to fd.o
Hey Robert, thank you for the reply.
2017-09-22 23:43 GMT+08:00 Robert Foss :
> Hey Chih-Wei,
> On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 10:40 +0800, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
>> Great news!
>> Thanks a lot to make it happen.
>>
>> I
Hey Robert, thank you for the reply.
2017-09-22 23:43 GMT+08:00 Robert Foss :
> Hey Chih-Wei,
> On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 10:40 +0800, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
>> Great news!
>> Thanks a lot to make it happen.
>>
>> I hope I am wrong.
>> From my understanding most x86 GPUs still
>> cannot work with drm_h
Hey Chih-Wei,
On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 10:40 +0800, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
> Great news!
> Thanks a lot to make it happen.
>
> I hope I am wrong.
> From my understanding most x86 GPUs still
> cannot work with drm_hwcomposer since
> they lack of atomic mode-setting API support
> required by drm_hwcomp
Hey Jani,
On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 14:21 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017, Robert Foss wrote:
> > After talking to Liviu Dudau at LPC and Sean Paul & Kaveh Nasri at
> > XDC
> > it seems that we all could benefit from community maintainership of
> > drm_hwcomposer.
>
> Sounds good!
>
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017, Robert Foss wrote:
> After talking to Liviu Dudau at LPC and Sean Paul & Kaveh Nasri at XDC
> it seems that we all could benefit from community maintainership of
> drm_hwcomposer.
Sounds good!
> Regarding contributions, they are accepted on the dri-devel list, using
> the pa
Great news!
Thanks a lot to make it happen.
I hope I am wrong.
From my understanding most x86 GPUs still
cannot work with drm_hwcomposer since
they lack of atomic mode-setting API support
required by drm_hwcomposer.
Hope this could be addressed soon since
drm_hwcomposer becomes a standard project
14 matches
Mail list logo