v4 00/15] CCS static load balance
Quoting Andi Shyti (2025-03-25 12:52:58)
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 10:24:42AM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > Do you have a reference to some GitLab issues or maybe some external
> > project issues where regressions around here are discu
Justification: To address a hardware bug causing stability issues when RCS and
multiple CCS operate simultaneously in dynamic load balancing mode, CCG limited
the CCS count to 1 as a software workaround. Many ECG customers run
compute-only workloads without requiring rendering tasks. Therefore,
Quoting Andi Shyti (2025-03-25 12:52:58)
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 10:24:42AM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > Do you have a reference to some GitLab issues or maybe some external
> > project issues where regressions around here are discussed?
>
> AFAIK, there's no GitLab issue for this becaus
The ccs mode setting support via sysfs is required by our customer.
Acked-by: Arshad Mehmood
From: Andi Shyti
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2025 9:29 PM
To: intel-gfx; dri-devel
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin; Joonas Lahtinen; Chris Wilson; Simona Vetter; Mehmood,
Arshad; Mrozek,
Hi Joonas,
thanks a lot for your reply!
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 10:24:42AM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Quoting Andi Shyti (2025-03-24 15:29:36)
> > Back in v3, this patch series was turned down due to community
> > policies regarding i915 GEM development. Since then, I have
> > received sever
Quoting Andi Shyti (2025-03-24 15:29:36)
> Hi,
>
> Back in v3, this patch series was turned down due to community
> policies regarding i915 GEM development. Since then, I have
> received several requests from userspace developers, which I
> initially declined in order to respect those policies.
>
Acked-by: Michal Mrozek
