Quoting Andi Shyti (2025-03-24 15:29:36) > Hi, > > Back in v3, this patch series was turned down due to community > policies regarding i915 GEM development. Since then, I have > received several requests from userspace developers, which I > initially declined in order to respect those policies. > > However, with the latest request from UMD users, I decided to > give this series another chance. I believe that when a feature > is genuinely needed, our goal should be to support it, not to > dismiss user and customer needs blindly.
We had plenty of community bug reports when the move to fixed CCS mode was initially implemented with some bugs. After those bugs were fixed, nobody was reporting impactful performance regressions. Do you have a reference to some GitLab issues or maybe some external project issues where regressions around here are discussed? Regards, Joonas
