Re: [RFC v2 8/8] drm/panthor: Expose the panthor perf ioctls

2025-03-27 Thread Lukas Zapolskas
On 27/01/2025 20:14, Adrián Larumbe wrote: I don't know what the usual practice is when adding a new DRM driver ioctl(), but wouldn't it make more sense to add the PERF_CONTROL one to the panthor_drm_driver_ioctls array in this patch instead? That does make more sense, I'll shuffle the pa

Re: [RFC v2 8/8] drm/panthor: Expose the panthor perf ioctls

2025-01-27 Thread Adrián Larumbe
I don't know what the usual practice is when adding a new DRM driver ioctl(), but wouldn't it make more sense to add the PERF_CONTROL one to the panthor_drm_driver_ioctls array in this patch instead? Other than that: Reviewed-by: Adrián Larumbe On 11.12.2024 16:50, Lukas Zapolskas wrote: > Si

[RFC v2 8/8] drm/panthor: Expose the panthor perf ioctls

2024-12-11 Thread Lukas Zapolskas
Signed-off-by: Lukas Zapolskas --- drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_drv.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_drv.c index 2848ab442d10..ef081a383fa9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/pant