I don't know what the usual practice is when adding a new DRM driver ioctl(),
but wouldn't it make
more sense to add the PERF_CONTROL one to the panthor_drm_driver_ioctls array
in this patch instead?
Other than that:
Reviewed-by: Adrián Larumbe <adrian.laru...@collabora.com>
On 11.12.2024 16:50, Lukas Zapolskas wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Zapolskas <lukas.zapols...@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_drv.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_drv.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_drv.c
> index 2848ab442d10..ef081a383fa9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_drv.c
> @@ -1654,6 +1654,8 @@ static void panthor_debugfs_init(struct drm_minor
> *minor)
> * - 1.1 - adds DEV_QUERY_TIMESTAMP_INFO query
> * - 1.2 - adds DEV_QUERY_GROUP_PRIORITIES_INFO query
> * - adds PANTHOR_GROUP_PRIORITY_REALTIME priority
> + * - 1.3 - adds DEV_QUERY_PERF_INFO query
> + * adds PERF_CONTROL ioctl
> */
> static const struct drm_driver panthor_drm_driver = {
> .driver_features = DRIVER_RENDER | DRIVER_GEM | DRIVER_SYNCOBJ |
> @@ -1667,7 +1669,7 @@ static const struct drm_driver panthor_drm_driver = {
> .name = "panthor",
> .desc = "Panthor DRM driver",
> .major = 1,
> - .minor = 2,
> + .minor = 3,
>
> .gem_create_object = panthor_gem_create_object,
> .gem_prime_import_sg_table = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table,
> --
> 2.25.1
Adrian Larumbe
