Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: fetch bpc using drm_atomic_state

2022-07-19 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 2:21 AM Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > Rather than reading the pdata->connector directly, fetch the connector > using drm_atomic_state. This allows us to make pdata->connector optional > (and thus supporting DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR). > > Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: fetch bpc using drm_atomic_state

2022-07-11 Thread Steev Klimaszewski
On 7/11/22 4:21 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: Rather than reading the pdata->connector directly, fetch the connector using drm_atomic_state. This allows us to make pdata->connector optional (and thus supporting DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR). Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinc

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: fetch bpc using drm_atomic_state

2022-07-11 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 2:21 AM Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > Rather than reading the pdata->connector directly, fetch the connector > using drm_atomic_state. This allows us to make pdata->connector optional > (and thus supporting DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR). > > Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg

[RFC PATCH v3 1/2] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: fetch bpc using drm_atomic_state

2022-07-11 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
Rather than reading the pdata->connector directly, fetch the connector using drm_atomic_state. This allows us to make pdata->connector optional (and thus supporting DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR). Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov --- driv