Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] drm/msm/dpu: rework vsync_source handling

2024-06-22 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 08:21:59PM GMT, Marijn Suijten wrote: > Maybe retitle this to something that more closely resembles "remove unset > is_te_using_watchdog_timer field"? Well, it really moves vsync_source selection to _dpu_kms_initialize_dsi(), it doesn't just drop the is_te_using_watchdog_ti

Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] drm/msm/dpu: rework vsync_source handling

2024-06-13 Thread Marijn Suijten
Maybe retitle this to something that more closely resembles "remove unset is_te_using_watchdog_timer field"? On 2024-06-13 20:05:08, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > The struct msm_display_info has is_te_using_watchdog_timer field which > is neither used anywhere nor is flexible enough to specify differe

[PATCH v2 5/8] drm/msm/dpu: rework vsync_source handling

2024-06-13 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
The struct msm_display_info has is_te_using_watchdog_timer field which is neither used anywhere nor is flexible enough to specify different sources. Replace it with the field specifying the vsync source using enum dpu_vsync_source. Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov ---