2012/3/29 Eugeni Dodonov :
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 18:28, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>
>
> I don't know if it should go into a separate patch though. But it is aligned
> to the other formatting patterns you do, and it certainly looks nicer this
> way, and it shouldn't break anything anyway. So I am fi
2012/3/29 Eugeni Dodonov :
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 18:28, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>
>
> I don't know if it should go into a separate patch though. But it is aligned
> to the other formatting patterns you do, and it certainly looks nicer this
> way, and it shouldn't break anything anyway. So I am fi
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 18:28, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni
>
> In the future we'll have more than just connector properties, so create
> a dump_prop function that can handle any property (instead of the
> current dump_props function that only handles connector properties).
>
> Also,
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 18:28, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni
>
> In the future we'll have more than just connector properties, so create
> a dump_prop function that can handle any property (instead of the
> current dump_props function that only handles connector properties).
>
> Also,
From: Paulo Zanoni
In the future we'll have more than just connector properties, so create
a dump_prop function that can handle any property (instead of the
current dump_props function that only handles connector properties).
Also, make this function print a lot more information about the existi
From: Paulo Zanoni
In the future we'll have more than just connector properties, so create
a dump_prop function that can handle any property (instead of the
current dump_props function that only handles connector properties).
Also, make this function print a lot more information about the existi
