On 06.09.2012 15:01, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Don, 2012-09-06 at 13:46 +0200, Christian K?nig wrote:
>> On 06.09.2012 12:53, Michel D?nzer wrote:
>>> From: Michel D?nzer
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michel D?nzer
>> Sounds good to me, but shouldn't we also increase the version number?
> Assuming you m
On Don, 2012-09-06 at 13:46 +0200, Christian K?nig wrote:
> On 06.09.2012 12:53, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > From: Michel D?nzer
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michel D?nzer
> Sounds good to me, but shouldn't we also increase the version number?
Assuming you mean the libdrm package version, I don't think
On 06.09.2012 12:53, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> From: Michel D?nzer
>
> Signed-off-by: Michel D?nzer
Sounds good to me, but shouldn't we also increase the version number?
Anyway: Reviewed-by: Christian K?nig
> ---
> radeon/radeon_surface.c | 124
> ++
From: Michel D?nzer
Signed-off-by: Michel D?nzer
---
radeon/radeon_surface.c | 124 ++-
1 file changed, 123 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/radeon/radeon_surface.c b/radeon/radeon_surface.c
index 4118a37..593c51c 100644
--- a/radeon/radeon
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> From: Michel D?nzer
>
> Signed-off-by: Michel D?nzer
for the series:
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher
> ---
> radeon/radeon_surface.c | 124
> ++-
> 1 file changed, 123 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> From: Michel Dänzer
>
> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer
for the series:
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher
> ---
> radeon/radeon_surface.c | 124
> ++-
> 1 file changed, 123 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
On 06.09.2012 15:01, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Don, 2012-09-06 at 13:46 +0200, Christian König wrote:
On 06.09.2012 12:53, Michel Dänzer wrote:
From: Michel Dänzer
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer
Sounds good to me, but shouldn't we also increase the version number?
Assuming you mean the libdrm
On Don, 2012-09-06 at 13:46 +0200, Christian König wrote:
> On 06.09.2012 12:53, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > From: Michel Dänzer
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer
> Sounds good to me, but shouldn't we also increase the version number?
Assuming you mean the libdrm package version, I don't think
On 06.09.2012 12:53, Michel Dänzer wrote:
From: Michel Dänzer
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer
Sounds good to me, but shouldn't we also increase the version number?
Anyway: Reviewed-by: Christian König
---
radeon/radeon_surface.c | 124 ++-
1 fi
From: Michel Dänzer
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer
---
radeon/radeon_surface.c | 124 ++-
1 file changed, 123 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/radeon/radeon_surface.c b/radeon/radeon_surface.c
index 4118a37..593c51c 100644
--- a/radeon/radeon
10 matches
Mail list logo