On Don, 2012-09-06 at 13:46 +0200, Christian K?nig wrote: > On 06.09.2012 12:53, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > From: Michel D?nzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Michel D?nzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com> > Sounds good to me, but shouldn't we also increase the version number?
Assuming you mean the libdrm package version, I don't think it's worth doing that just for these fixes. At this point, one should always use latest Git of mesa and libdrm for radeonsi. But of course, once a libdrm release is out with these fixes, we can require that as the minimum version for radeonsi. > Anyway: Reviewed-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> Thanks, is that for the whole series? -- Earthling Michel D?nzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer
