[PATCH 2/3] drm: Add probed modes in probe order

2013-06-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 08:48:48AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 09:15:29AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:17 PM, wrote: > > > From: Ville Syrj?l? > > > > > > Keeping the modes in the same order as we probe them makes it a bit > > > easier to tra

[PATCH 2/3] drm: Add probed modes in probe order

2013-06-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:17 PM, wrote: > From: Ville Syrj?l? > > Keeping the modes in the same order as we probe them makes it a bit > easier to track what's happening. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrj?l? I've just added a regression fixer to my -fixes queue which depends upon the old behaviour

[PATCH 2/3] drm: Add probed modes in probe order

2013-06-11 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 09:15:29AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:17 PM, wrote: > > From: Ville Syrj?l? > > > > Keeping the modes in the same order as we probe them makes it a bit > > easier to track what's happening. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrj?l? > > I've just

Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm: Add probed modes in probe order

2013-06-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 08:48:48AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 09:15:29AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:17 PM, wrote: > > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > > > Keeping the modes in the same order as we probe them makes it a bit > > > easier to tra

Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm: Add probed modes in probe order

2013-06-11 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 09:15:29AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:17 PM, wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > Keeping the modes in the same order as we probe them makes it a bit > > easier to track what's happening. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä > > I've just

Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm: Add probed modes in probe order

2013-06-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:17 PM, wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Keeping the modes in the same order as we probe them makes it a bit > easier to track what's happening. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä I've just added a regression fixer to my -fixes queue which depends upon the old behaviour

[PATCH 2/3] drm: Add probed modes in probe order

2013-05-31 Thread ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
From: Ville Syrj?l? Keeping the modes in the same order as we probe them makes it a bit easier to track what's happening. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrj?l? --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm

[PATCH 2/3] drm: Add probed modes in probe order

2013-05-31 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Keeping the modes in the same order as we probe them makes it a bit easier to track what's happening. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm