On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 09:15:29AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:17 PM, <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote: > > From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> > > > > Keeping the modes in the same order as we probe them makes it a bit > > easier to track what's happening. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> > > I've just added a regression fixer to my -fixes queue which depends > upon the old behaviour ... I'll make a note to fix this once stuff is > merged together again. For reference the patch this will break in > -fixes is: > > commit c3456fb3e4712d0448592af3c5d644c9472cd3c1 > Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> > Date: Mon Jun 10 09:47:58 2013 +0200 > > drm/i915: prefer VBT modes for SVDO-LVDS over EDID
That is not the only place to have a subtle dependence upon the ordering of modes in the list. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
