On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 09:38:20AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Do you plan to pick this up in your console/vt/whatever-fixes branch?
Yes, now that the merge window is closed, I will be picking this up.
thanks,
greg k-h
___
dri-devel mai
Hi Greg,
Do you plan to pick this up in your console/vt/whatever-fixes branch?
There's no reason for me to route this through drm-fixes.
-Daniel
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:09:03AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Not really harmful not to, but also not harm in grabbing the lock. And
> this shuts up
Am 18.07.2019 um 10:09 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
Not really harmful not to, but also not harm in grabbing the lock. And
this shuts up a new WARNING I introduced in commit ddde3c18b700 ("vt:
More locking checks").
Reported-by: Jens Remus
Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesk
Hi Daniel.
Patch looks good. You can add my:
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg
For good measure I checked all other users of con_is_bound()
and they looked good from a locking perspective.
Then I looked a bit more for missing locking and lost
the overview.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:09:03AM +0200, Daniel
Not really harmful not to, but also not harm in grabbing the lock. And
this shuts up a new WARNING I introduced in commit ddde3c18b700 ("vt:
More locking checks").
Reported-by: Jens Remus
Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-fb...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linu
