On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 01:42:38PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:35:19 -0700
> St?phane Marchesin wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Jesse Barnes > > virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> > >> People keep whining
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 15:56:04 +0200
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 01:42:38PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:35:19 -0700
> > St?phane Marchesin wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Vetter
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:0
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:35:19 -0700
St?phane Marchesin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Jesse Barnes
> > wrote:
> >> People keep whining about this, but no one seems to send a patch. This
> >> *ought* to be safe now that we've
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
>> People keep whining about this, but no one seems to send a patch. This
>> *ought* to be safe now that we've dealt with the hw races in Mario's
>> updated code, and fixed the bugs w
On 02.11.12 19:37, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 06:56:57 +0100
> Mario Kleiner wrote:
>> Jesse, thanks for cc'ing me, much appreciated :)
>>
>> Psychtoolbox should be fine with a 50 msecs vblank off delay. I think i
>> tested with values somewhere between 50 - 100 msecs at the time th
On 02.11.12 19:37, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 06:56:57 +0100
Mario Kleiner wrote:
Jesse, thanks for cc'ing me, much appreciated :)
Psychtoolbox should be fine with a 50 msecs vblank off delay. I think i
tested with values somewhere between 50 - 100 msecs at the time the drm
patche
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 06:56:57 +0100
Mario Kleiner wrote:
> Jesse, thanks for cc'ing me, much appreciated :)
>
> Psychtoolbox should be fine with a 50 msecs vblank off delay. I think i
> tested with values somewhere between 50 - 100 msecs at the time the drm
> patches were made. The way i schedul
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 06:56:57 +0100
Mario Kleiner wrote:
> Jesse, thanks for cc'ing me, much appreciated :)
>
> Psychtoolbox should be fine with a 50 msecs vblank off delay. I think i
> tested with values somewhere between 50 - 100 msecs at the time the drm
> patches were made. The way i schedul
On 30.10.12 20:28, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:20:44 +0100
> Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Jesse Barnes
>> wrote:
>>> People keep whining about this, but no one seems to send a patch. This
>>> *ought* to be safe now that we've dealt with the hw race
On 30.10.12 20:28, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:20:44 +0100
Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
People keep whining about this, but no one seems to send a patch. This
*ought* to be safe now that we've dealt with the hw races in Mario's
upd
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Jesse Barnes
wrote:
> People keep whining about this, but no one seems to send a patch. This
> *ought* to be safe now that we've dealt with the hw races in Mario's
> updated code, and fixed the bugs we know about in VT switch, DPMS, and
> multi-head configuraions
People keep whining about this, but no one seems to send a patch. This
*ought* to be safe now that we've dealt with the hw races in Mario's
updated code, and fixed the bugs we know about in VT switch, DPMS, and
multi-head configuraions.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_stub.c
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:20:44 +0100
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
> > People keep whining about this, but no one seems to send a patch. This
> > *ought* to be safe now that we've dealt with the hw races in Mario's
> > updated code, and fixed the b
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:20:44 +0100
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
> > People keep whining about this, but no one seems to send a patch. This
> > *ought* to be safe now that we've dealt with the hw races in Mario's
> > updated code, and fixed the b
Cc'ing Mario in case he wants a different value than 50ms.
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:09:12 -0500
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> People keep whining about this, but no one seems to send a patch. This
> *ought* to be safe now that we've dealt with the hw races in Mario's
> updated code, and fixed the bugs we
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> People keep whining about this, but no one seems to send a patch. This
> *ought* to be safe now that we've dealt with the hw races in Mario's
> updated code, and fixed the bugs we know about in VT switch, DPMS, and
> multi-head configuraions.
Cc'ing Mario in case he wants a different value than 50ms.
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:09:12 -0500
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> People keep whining about this, but no one seems to send a patch. This
> *ought* to be safe now that we've dealt with the hw races in Mario's
> updated code, and fixed the bugs we
People keep whining about this, but no one seems to send a patch. This
*ought* to be safe now that we've dealt with the hw races in Mario's
updated code, and fixed the bugs we know about in VT switch, DPMS, and
multi-head configuraions.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_stub.c
18 matches
Mail list logo
