On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:56:11 +0100,
Christian K6nig wrote:
>
> Am 11.03.20 um 08:52 schrieb Huang Rui:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 03:34:52PM +0800, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >> Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size instead of the
> >> actual output size, the succeeding calls may go beyond
Am 11.03.20 um 08:52 schrieb Huang Rui:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 03:34:52PM +0800, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size instead of the
actual output size, the succeeding calls may go beyond the given
buffer limit. Fix it by replacing with scnprintf().
Signed-off
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 03:34:52PM +0800, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size instead of the
> actual output size, the succeeding calls may go beyond the given
> buffer limit. Fix it by replacing with scnprintf().
>
> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai
Reviewed-by:
Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size instead of the
actual output size, the succeeding calls may go beyond the given
buffer limit. Fix it by replacing with scnprintf().
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+),
