Am 11.03.20 um 08:52 schrieb Huang Rui:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 03:34:52PM +0800, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size instead of the
actual output size, the succeeding calls may go beyond the given
buffer limit. Fix it by replacing with scnprintf().
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <ti...@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.hu...@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
Takashi, should I push this to drm-misc-next or do you want to merge
that somehow else?
Thanks,
Christian.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c
index bf876faea592..faefaaef7909 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c
@@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ static struct dma_pool *ttm_dma_pool_init(struct device
*dev, gfp_t flags,
p = pool->name;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(t); i++) {
if (type & t[i]) {
- p += snprintf(p, sizeof(pool->name) - (p - pool->name),
+ p += scnprintf(p, sizeof(pool->name) - (p - pool->name),
"%s", n[i]);
}
}
--
2.16.4
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
