2013/4/27 Sylwester Nawrocki
> On 04/26/2013 09:42 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
>> On Friday 26 of April 2013 11:48:50 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>>
Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that
__mode_of_device_table is multi defined a
2013/4/27 Tomasz Figa
> On Friday 26 of April 2013 11:48:50 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
> > > Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that
> > > __mode_of_device_table is multi defined at fimd and g2d side so there
> > > still is module build err
2013/4/27 Sylwester Nawrocki
> On 04/26/2013 09:42 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
>> On Friday 26 of April 2013 11:48:50 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>>
Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that
__mode_of_device_table is multi defined a
2013/4/27 Tomasz Figa
> On Friday 26 of April 2013 11:48:50 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
> > > Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that
> > > __mode_of_device_table is multi defined at fimd and g2d side so there
> > > still is module build err
On 04/26/2013 09:42 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Friday 26 of April 2013 11:48:50 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that
__mode_of_device_table is multi defined at fimd and g2d side so there
still is module build erro
On 04/26/2013 09:42 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Friday 26 of April 2013 11:48:50 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>> Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that
>>> __mode_of_device_table is multi defined at fimd and g2d side so there
>>> still is modu
On Friday 26 of April 2013 11:48:50 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
> > Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that
> > __mode_of_device_table is multi defined at fimd and g2d side so there
> > still is module build error. :(
> Since all drivers seem to
Hi Tomasz,
2013/4/26 Tomasz Figa
> Hi Inki,
>
> On Friday 26 of April 2013 14:03:10 Inki Dae wrote:
> > This patch fixes multiple definition error like below when building it
> > as moudle with device tree support.
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.o: In function `.LANCHOR1':
> > ex
This patch fixes multiple definition error like below when building it
as moudle with device tree support.
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.o: In function `.LANCHOR1':
exynos_drm_g2d.c:(.rodata+0x6c): multiple definition of `__mod_of_device_table'
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.o:exyn
On Friday 26 of April 2013 11:48:50 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
> > Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that
> > __mode_of_device_table is multi defined at fimd and g2d side so there
> > still is module build error. :(
> Since all drivers seem to
On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
> Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that __mode_of_device_table
> is
> multi defined at fimd and g2d side so there still is module build error. :(
Since all drivers seem to be linked into single a single module, you
likely need to create a s
Hi Inki,
On Friday 26 of April 2013 14:03:10 Inki Dae wrote:
> This patch fixes multiple definition error like below when building it
> as moudle with device tree support.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.o: In function `.LANCHOR1':
> exynos_drm_g2d.c:(.rodata+0x6c): multiple definition
On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
> Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that __mode_of_device_table
> is
> multi defined at fimd and g2d side so there still is module build error. :(
Since all drivers seem to be linked into single a single module, you
likely need to create a s
Hi Tomasz,
2013/4/26 Tomasz Figa
> Hi Inki,
>
> On Friday 26 of April 2013 14:03:10 Inki Dae wrote:
> > This patch fixes multiple definition error like below when building it
> > as moudle with device tree support.
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.o: In function `.LANCHOR1':
> > ex
Hi Inki,
On Friday 26 of April 2013 14:03:10 Inki Dae wrote:
> This patch fixes multiple definition error like below when building it
> as moudle with device tree support.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.o: In function `.LANCHOR1':
> exynos_drm_g2d.c:(.rodata+0x6c): multiple definition
This patch fixes multiple definition error like below when building it
as moudle with device tree support.
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.o: In function `.LANCHOR1':
exynos_drm_g2d.c:(.rodata+0x6c): multiple definition of `__mod_of_device_table'
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.o:exyn
16 matches
Mail list logo
