Hi Liviu,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 3:03 PM Liviu Dudau wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 05:28:19PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 5:11 PM Sean Paul wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 04:17:25PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 4:08 PM Brian
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 05:28:19PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 5:11 PM Sean Paul wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 04:17:25PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 4:08 PM Brian Starkey
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 03:03:59PM
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:03:40PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019, "Wentland, Harry" wrote:
> > Would it make sense to append something like ", if such a test can be
> > reasonably made using IGT for the target HW." to make it clear to
> > contributors that in cases like the one d
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:11:36PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > If it helps, maybe we could draw up a list somewhere (README in igt?
> > wiki?) of which tests seem to pass generically across a few drivers,
> > which ones are expected to pass, which ones
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 09:40:34AM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 08:19:10PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 8:00 PM Wentland, Harry
> > wrote:
> > > On 2019-01-16 11:39 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > Compared to the RFC[1] no changes to the patc
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019, Daniel Stone wrote:
> If it helps, maybe we could draw up a list somewhere (README in igt?
> wiki?) of which tests seem to pass generically across a few drivers,
> which ones are expected to pass, which ones don't but really should,
> etc. I'm currently running on imx-drm (com
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 19:42, Wentland, Harry wrote:
> On 2019-01-22 2:19 p.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > I'd say we'll shrug these cases off as "can't be reasonable tested,
> > won't have an igt". First driver team with hw that can be validated
> > gets to fill the gaps :-) In practice still
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019, "Wentland, Harry" wrote:
> Would it make sense to append something like ", if such a test can be
> reasonably made using IGT for the target HW." to make it clear to
> contributors that in cases like the one discussed this is at the
> reviewers discretion?
I think the simplest
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 02:53:37PM -0500, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 07:42:30PM +, Wentland, Harry wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2019-01-22 2:19 p.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 8:00 PM Wentland, Harry
> > > wrote:
> > >> On 2019-01-16 11:39 a.m., Daniel Vett
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 08:19:10PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 8:00 PM Wentland, Harry
> wrote:
> > On 2019-01-16 11:39 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > Compared to the RFC[1] no changes to the patch itself, but igt moved
> > > forward a lot:
> > >
> > > - gitlab CI buil
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 07:42:30PM +, Wentland, Harry wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-01-22 2:19 p.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 8:00 PM Wentland, Harry
> > wrote:
> >> On 2019-01-16 11:39 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>> Compared to the RFC[1] no changes to the patch itself, bu
On 2019-01-22 2:19 p.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 8:00 PM Wentland, Harry
> wrote:
>> On 2019-01-16 11:39 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> Compared to the RFC[1] no changes to the patch itself, but igt moved
>>> forward a lot:
>>>
>>> - gitlab CI builds with: reduced configs
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 8:00 PM Wentland, Harry wrote:
> On 2019-01-16 11:39 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Compared to the RFC[1] no changes to the patch itself, but igt moved
> > forward a lot:
> >
> > - gitlab CI builds with: reduced configs/libraries, arm cross build
> > and a sysroot build
On 2019-01-16 11:39 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Compared to the RFC[1] no changes to the patch itself, but igt moved
> forward a lot:
>
> - gitlab CI builds with: reduced configs/libraries, arm cross build
> and a sysroot build (should address all the build/cross platform
> concerns raised in
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 5:11 PM Sean Paul wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 04:17:25PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 4:08 PM Brian Starkey wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 03:03:59PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:27 PM Brian Stark
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 04:17:25PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 4:08 PM Brian Starkey wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 03:03:59PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:27 PM Brian Starkey
> > > wrote:
> >
/snip
>
> > > > > > > That seems a
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 4:08 PM Brian Starkey wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 03:03:59PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:27 PM Brian Starkey wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > >
> > > That doesn't really address my issue, but no matter. I guess I'm
> > > having a hard time separ
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 03:03:59PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:27 PM Brian Starkey wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > That doesn't really address my issue, but no matter. I guess I'm
> > having a hard time separating the existing igts from _new_ igts for
> > new features; so sorry
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:27 PM Brian Starkey wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 09:53:20AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 6:21 PM Daniel Vetter
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 12:54 PM Brian Starkey
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 09:53:20AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 6:21 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 12:54 PM Brian Starkey
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:52:16PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > O
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 6:21 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 12:54 PM Brian Starkey wrote:
> >
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:52:16PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:38 PM Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 12:54 PM Brian Starkey wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:52:16PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:38 PM Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 05:39:03PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > Compared to the RFC[1]
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:52:16PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:38 PM Liviu Dudau wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 05:39:03PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > Compared to the RFC[1] no changes to the patch itself, but igt moved
> > > forward a lot:
>
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 04:59:49PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 3:54 PM Liviu Dudau wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 01:32:15PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 1:26 PM Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:52:16PM +0
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 3:54 PM Liviu Dudau wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 01:32:15PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 1:26 PM Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:52:16PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:38 PM Liviu Du
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 01:32:15PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 1:26 PM Liviu Dudau wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:52:16PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:38 PM Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 05:39:03PM +
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 1:26 PM Liviu Dudau wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:52:16PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:38 PM Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 05:39:03PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > Compared to the RFC[1] no changes to the
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:52:16PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:38 PM Liviu Dudau wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 05:39:03PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > Compared to the RFC[1] no changes to the patch itself, but igt moved
> > > forward a lot:
> > >
> > > -
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:38 PM Liviu Dudau wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 05:39:03PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Compared to the RFC[1] no changes to the patch itself, but igt moved
> > forward a lot:
> >
> > - gitlab CI builds with: reduced configs/libraries, arm cross build
> > and a
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 11:41 PM Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> Daniel Vetter writes:
>
> > Compared to the RFC[1] no changes to the patch itself, but igt moved
> > forward a lot:
> >
> > - gitlab CI builds with: reduced configs/libraries, arm cross build
> > and a sysroot build (should address all the
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 05:39:03PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Compared to the RFC[1] no changes to the patch itself, but igt moved
> forward a lot:
>
> - gitlab CI builds with: reduced configs/libraries, arm cross build
> and a sysroot build (should address all the build/cross platform
> co
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 01:01:00PM +0200, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 05:39:03PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Compared to the RFC[1] no changes to the patch itself, but igt moved
> > forward a lot:
> >
> > - gitlab CI builds with: reduced configs/libraries, arm cross build
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 05:39:03PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Compared to the RFC[1] no changes to the patch itself, but igt moved
> forward a lot:
>
> - gitlab CI builds with: reduced configs/libraries, arm cross build
> and a sysroot build (should address all the build/cross platform
> co
Daniel Vetter writes:
> Compared to the RFC[1] no changes to the patch itself, but igt moved
> forward a lot:
>
> - gitlab CI builds with: reduced configs/libraries, arm cross build
> and a sysroot build (should address all the build/cross platform
> concerns raised in the RFC discussions).
>
Compared to the RFC[1] no changes to the patch itself, but igt moved
forward a lot:
- gitlab CI builds with: reduced configs/libraries, arm cross build
and a sysroot build (should address all the build/cross platform
concerns raised in the RFC discussions).
- tests reorganized into subdirecto
35 matches
Mail list logo
