Given a message itht he headers:
Subject: This is the subject:
X-Foo: bar
how would I do the following:
1) Add the contents of X-Foo to subject
Subject: [bar] This is the subject
2) replicate the X-Foo header into X-temp
X-temp: X-foo-bar
--
THE PRESIDENT DID IT IS NOT AN
The version of dovecot in freebsd ports tree is still 2.3.6, any idea when this
will be updated to 2.3.7?
--
"I can't see the point in the theatre. All that sex and violence. I get
enough of that at home. Apart from the sex, of course." - Baldrick
On 23 Jul 2019, at 08:00, @lbutlr wrote:
> The version of dovecot in freebsd ports tree is still 2.3.6, any idea when
> this will be updated to 2.3.7?
Sorry, please ignore this; brain cloud.
--
I gotta straighten my face This mellow-thighed chick just put my spine
out of place
> Subject: This is the subject:
> X-Foo: bar
>
> how would I do the following:
>
> 1) Add the contents of X-Foo to subject
> Subject: [bar] This is the subject
>
> 2) replicate the X-Foo header into X-temp
> X-temp: X-foo-bar
Is there a sieve list that might be more appropriate for
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019, at 11:29 AM, tono wrote:
> I am getting a persistent seg fault while trying to sync our server to
> a new location.
>
> We are on 2.2.33.2, due for an upgrade but we have used dsync
> successfully in the past.
Fixed this by upgrading to 2.3.6. Thanks anyway!
Hi,
I have recently migrated (under emergency conditions) a dovecot imap/pop
based server to a new instance. The mailboxes used mdbox format and due
to various screwups I had corrupt indexes. I thought I'd cleaned this up
but then I found that this new instance hadn't been set up correctly for
nf
On 26 Jul 2019, at 09:35, dove...@filter.demeijer.com wrote:
> I basically followed https://www.c0ffee.net/blog/mail-server-guide/ And
> dovecot with solr is running fine on freebsd for me.
Thanks for that link, looks very straight-forward.
--
Nothing says poor craftsmanship more than wrinkled
On 27 Jul 2019, at 00:42, Patrick Mahan wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 2:44 PM @lbutlr via dovecot
> wrote:
> On 26 Jul 2019, at 09:35, dove...@filter.demeijer.com wrote:
> > I basically followed https://www.c0ffee.net/blog/mail-server-guide/ And
> > dovecot with so
On 27 Jul 2019, at 04:15, Jorge Bastos wrote:
> When i migrated the account from the old imap server to the new (dovecot), i
> didn't removed and created the account in msoutlook, as i didn't saw any
> reason to do it.
> Creating the account again, IDLE works ok!
Glad you got that figured out. Se
I have a rule in sieve like the following:
if anyof (header :contains ["to"] [ "box", "change", "cornell”, “twitter”]) {
setflag "\\Seen";
fileinto :create "misc";
stop;
}
The messages that come in are using address extensions, so
user+twit...@example.com, for example.
The trouble is,
Never mind, I figured out my (stupid) error.
> I have a rule in sieve like the following:
>
> if anyof (header :contains ["to"] [ "box", "change", "cornell”, “twitter”]) {
--
'My strength is like the strength of ten because my heart is pure,' said
Carrot. 'Really? Well, there's eleven of the
My auth process is dumping core. This happens several times per day but
dovecot can operate normally for hours between errors.
The crash occurs in src/auth/auth-policy.c, line 356:
t@1 (l@1) program terminated by signal SEGV (no mapping at the fault
address)
Current function is auth_policy_p
using successfully active/active replica. trying to add a proxy node in
front. this proxy node should do the auth with the same ldap passdb
settings as the replica in addition (later with kerberos). so i add to
10-auth.conf on the proxy:
default_fields = proxy=y host=imap.myserver.lan p
When reindexing I go the following error
Mailbox test: UID=1: read(/path/to/mail,S=4248,W=4349) failed: Cached message
size larger than expected (4248 > 1182, box=test, UID=1) (read reason=mail
stream)
In this case, the message was an unimportant test message with no content, so I
simply remov
The link to the latest 2.2 release points to 2.2.36.1 but the latest 2.2
is actually 2.2.36.3.
Peter
Hi,
As per my discussion with cmouse on irc, I'm currently just using
dovecot for its auth mechanism, etc capabilities (alas, Exim does
not support argon directly). Tis a fun little side project. :)
I have the config pared down as far as I think is reasonable (see
below) and all is working well e
On 02/08/2019 11:45, James via dovecot wrote:
My auth process is dumping core. This happens several times per day but
dovecot can operate normally for hours between errors.
The crash occurs in src/auth/auth-policy.c, line 356:
t@1 (l@1) program terminated by signal SEGV (no mapping at the
On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 11:27:24AM -0600, Michael Slusarz wrote:
> > Errors hit the logs but I would appreciate seeing successful auths
> > happen for the additional piece of mind. Cmouse and I couldn't
> > find a way to do it on irc and it appears that the capability is
> > missing. Successul /log
ok solved my problem by adding master user on backend and self-signed
ssl certs on proxy instance:
default_fields = proxy=y host=imap.myserver.lan port=993 ssl=yes
master=masteruser pass=masterpass
Hi everyone
Given that I am not an expert, I am doing tests with Solr, I installed
following the guide but I have no benefits on the search, the search on
the body on 28000 mails takes a few minutes and then goes to timeout.
I had installed version 8.2.0 of solr then I thought that there is
som
ail client: thunderbird, roundcube (webmail), mutt
> or any other email client via imap protocol.
>
> 25.06.2019 22:10, Germán Herrera пишет:
>> Are you copying/moving the emails with {cp|mv} or with "doveadm {copy|move}"?
>>
>> On 2019-06-25 12:00, Aleksandr
Hello,
using letsencrypt ssl certs with san works perfectly with 2.2.34, but
after uprading to 2.3.4.1 it couldn't verified (also tried v2.3.7.1).
i connect to imap.myserver.lan
the cn of the cert is myserver.lan and has the san imap.myserver.lan
openssl s_client -connect imap.myserver.lan:993
On 06/08/2019 06:46, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
On 2.8.2019 13.45, James via dovecot wrote:
My auth process is dumping core. This happens several times per day
...
There is an easy fix for this, attached.
Patch applied; no core dump in 24 hours.
This appears to have fixed the problem
On 07/08/2019 11:02, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
before and after auth? roundcube webmail reports an error with only
auth_policy_check_before_auth. I cannot see why. The simple and lazy
solution is to use double auth_policy_check_!
...
The double-check is for places which want to
gotten or am I wrong?
If you have time to see or try any queries, I have access to
http://5.39.2.59:8987/solr/#/ without a password.
thanks for your time!
Il 06/08/2019 23:30, Shawn Heisey via dovecot ha scritto:
On 8/5/2019 12:02 PM, HTMLServices.it via dovecot wrote:
Given that I am not a
with v2.2.34 i can use:
ssl_ca =
On 07/08/2019 11:19, James via dovecot wrote:
My more simplistic policy does not need both. I perform whitelist,
blacklist, geo and greylist
...and DNSBL which where I started with the policyserver, "Can dovecot
do DNSBL?", only indirectly via a policyserver. This is better as
How to make the client tool only display emails within 30 days? thanks！！！
h...@cndns.com
doveadm search -u matt mailbox "*" savedbefore 30d
Dovecot's configuration or plugin can do similar effects like the above？
Outlook uses pop or imap to receive mail within 30 days.
Thank you so much, I tried it！
h...@cndns.com
发件人： Aki Tuomi via dovecot
发送时间： 2019-08-08 15:47
收件人： h...@cndns.com; dovecot
主题： Re: How to make the client tool only display emails within 30 days?
On 8.8.2019 10.46, hfh--- via dovecot wrote:
doveadm search -u matt mailbox "*" saved
ok thanks for clarification
No, that has always been a mistake and it was fixed in 2.3. Our SSL pages in
documentation & wiki have always recommended concatenating the intermediates
with the cert.
Aki
On 8 Aug 2019, at 13:03, Amir Caspi wrote:
> IMHO the setting should apply regardless of protocol, but is that actually
> the case in practice?
It seems to be broken.
I have
namespace inbox {
inbox = yes
location =
mailbox Drafts {
special_use = \Drafts
}
mailbox Junk {
autoexpunge = 14 days
a
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to migrate my gmail to dovecot following instructions at
https://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration/Gmail
Using -a 'virtual/All' option does not seem to work because the gmail
folder with that name does not exist, but -a '[Gmail]/All Mail' seem to
work. I'm using the following
you,Yuri
On Sun, 2019-08-11 at 15:05 -0700, Yuri via dovecot wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I'm trying to migrate my gmail to dovecot following instructions at
> https://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration/Gmail
> Using -a 'virtual/All' option does not seem to work because the gmail
>
On 12 Aug 2019, at 00:18, Sami Ketola wrote:
> "1. What's the first mail's saved-timestamp?
> doveadm fetch -u user date.saved mailbox Junk 1
>
> 2. That timestamp should also be the same in dovecot.list.index:
> doveadm mailbox status -u user firstsaved Junk"
>
> can you check that information?
Dovecot's acl plugin can prevent deletion of messages,it works very well!
I want:
Some ips can delete messages, other ips can not delete messages,can anyone help
me?
h...@cndns.com
On 13 Aug 19, at 05:58 , James Brown wrote:
>
> b) does Mail.app and other mail clients on Macs or iOS devices perform
> searches on their local copy of mail or does it just send a search request to
> the server?
Mail.app uses spotlight on the local data, so if your users are all Mac then
sol
Hello!
Dovecot uses it's own SASL implementation, doesn't it?
Aug 14 23:45:23 example.com auth[10428]: GSSAPI client step 1
Aug 14 23:45:23 example.com auth[10428]: encoded packet size too big
(813804546 > 65536)
Aug 14 23:45:23 example.com dovecot[10085]: auth-worker(104
The next combination of parameters makes 100% LDAP connections unsuccessful
(the log snippet form the previous mail).
sasl_bind = yes
sasl_mech = gssapi
tls = yes
Looks like this combination is utterly incorrect and should be prohibited (tls
must not be used when mech is gssapi).
https://lists.f
I see nothing suspicious in FreeIPA slapd logs because connection drops before
SASL negotiation completion.
Network analysis shows client sending RST after receiving `bindResponse(7)
saslBindInProgress`.
On 8/15/19 3:07 PM, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> I suspect the problem is that dove
of the AP-REP
is interpreted as packet length.
I will ask cyrus-sasl project for further help.
Sorry for the hassles.
On 8/15/19 4:14 PM, Eugene via dovecot wrote:
> I see nothing suspicious in FreeIPA slapd logs because connection drops
> before SASL negotiation completion.
> Net
I was looking at a mail folder and I noted that a file in the inbox had a total
of 11 hard links to it:
👹 # exa -lH cur/1564249738.M167990P53982.mail.covisp.net,S=8572,W=8738:2,Sgl
.rw--- 11 8.6k vpopmail 19 Jul 19:59
cur/1564249738.M167990P53982.mail.covisp.net,S=8572,W=8738:2,Sgl
👹 # find
On 16 Aug 19, at 07:33 , @lbutlr wrote:
> I was looking at a mail folder and I noted that a file in the inbox had a
> total of 11 hard links to it:
Ack. I checked the junk folder and there are 379 files in there with 379 links!
Since they were all in jink I just deleted them all, but that canno
Hi,
We have mail server in production, with Exim + Dovecot + Mailman + OpenLDAP
+ Roundcube webmail server.
Openldap keeps mail accounts in db, exim uses lmtp transport to deliver
messages to dovecot.
Mailman is responsible for mailing lists, Roundcube webmail has managsieve
module to create sieve
On 17 Aug 19, at 10:14 , Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Hard links are created when a mail is copied with the IMAP COPY command. So
> Dovecot just does what the client asks it to do. Maybe you have some
> misbehaving IMAP client?
Maybe. Heck, I’ll grant probably, even.
But what do I do about it? How c
On 16 Aug 19, at 16:57 , @lbutlr wrote:
> Ack. I checked the junk folder and there are 379 files in there with 379
> links!
It appears the main culprit is actually the sieve script that is supposed to
mark messages moved out of the Junk box as ham. Somehow it was getting itself
stuck and creat
Hi - perhaps someone can help me.
Starting from a good and well-functioning mailserver setup, I have installed
MailCrypt as per the instructions (I think) to have the per-user passworded
keys setup.
dovecot.conf
/Added:/
mail_attribute_dict = file:%h/Maildir/dovecot-attributes
mail_plugins = $ma
On 21 Aug 2019, at 07:12, Kristijan Savic - ratiokontakt GmbH
wrote:
> ssl3
> Any ide what could be causing it?
Old MUAs or bad settings on the MUA. SSLv3 should not be used.
You should NOT try to add support for SSLv3.
--
"Alas, earwax.”
On 27-8-2019 18:03, Giovanni Mancuso via dovecot wrote:
Hi,
Can i "group by" e-mails based on custom header in imap?
According to my experience if i use "XX UID SEARCH INTHREAD REFS
HEADER myheader myvalue" i receive emails UID gathers by
HEADER+VALUE, but in this way
> On Aug 28, 2019, at 8:07 AM, Timo Sirainen via dovecot
> wrote:
>
>> On 25 Aug 2019, at 21.51, Sebastian Krause via dovecot
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In many mail setups a required feature (for privacy reasons) is to
>> hide the hos
Hi,
I use a post login script for imap, to fetch acl groups from LDAP. Because
Dovecot can only deal with a single value, which must be a comma seperated list
of groups, I decided to use a post login script do deal with multi values in
LDAP:
This looks like this in LDAP:
rnsMSACLGroup: admin
Further information below.
> Am 28.08.2019 um 14:52 schrieb R.N.S. via dovecot :
>
> Hi,
>
> I use a post login script for imap, to fetch acl groups from LDAP. Because
> Dovecot can only deal with a single value, which must be a comma seperated
> list of groups, I decide
> Am 28.08.2019 um 19:46 schrieb Jakobus Schürz via dovecot
> :
>
> I think, i had the same problem as you.
>
> When dovecot runs lmtp, no user is logged in, so there is no user from
> which you can get groups. So i think, my solution is (not really sure,
> if this is
> Am 28.08.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot :
>
>
>> On 28/08/2019 21:01 R.N.S. via dovecot wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Am 28.08.2019 um 19:46 schrieb Jakobus Schürz via dovecot
>>> :
>>>
>>> I think, i had the same proble
> Am 28.08.2019 um 20:11 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot :
>
>
>> On 28/08/2019 21:07 R.N.S. via dovecot wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Am 28.08.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot :
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 28/08/2019 21:01 R.N.S. vi
>>> I think, i had the same problem as you.
>>>
>>> When dovecot runs lmtp, no user is logged in, so there is no user from
>>> which you can get groups. So i think, my solution is (not really sure,
>>> if this is right, it's a long time ago, i played around) this transport
>>> in exim for local de
> Am 28.08.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot :
>
>
>> On 28/08/2019 21:01 R.N.S. via dovecot wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Am 28.08.2019 um 19:46 schrieb Jakobus Schürz via dovecot
>>> :
>>>
>>> I think, i had the same proble
> Am 29.08.2019 um 11:23 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot :
>
>
> On 29.8.2019 12.18, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote:
>>
>>> Am 28.08.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot :
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 28/08/2019 21:01 R.N.S. via dovecot wrote:
> Am 29.08.2019 um 11:30 schrieb R.N.S. via dovecot :
>
>
>
>> Am 29.08.2019 um 11:23 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot :
>>
>>
>> On 29.8.2019 12.18, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote:
>>>
>>>> Am 28.08.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Aki Tuomi via d
> Am 29.08.2019 um 11:58 schrieb R.N.S. via dovecot :
>
>
>
>> Am 29.08.2019 um 11:30 schrieb R.N.S. via dovecot :
>>
>>
>>
>>> Am 29.08.2019 um 11:23 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot :
>>>
>>>
>>> On 29.8.2019 12.18,
Op 1-9-2019 om 14:41 schreef Aleksandr Mette via dovecot:
>
> Dear Sirs,
>
>
>
> There is Postfix+Dovecot+Sogo installation in our company.
>
>
> I have attentively red Installation and Configuration Guide.
>
> However, I could not find some information.
>
>
On 9/1/19 5:41 AM, Aleksandr Mette via dovecot wrote:
>
> Dear Sirs,
>
>
>
> There is Postfix+Dovecot+Sogo installation in our company.
>
>
> I have attentively red Installation and Configuration Guide.
>
> However, I could not find some information.
>
>
Good Morning List,
just a short question to this vulnerability. We are using a setup with dovecot
redirector/proxy frontend servers
and some backend server, which store the mailboxes.
Is it anough to update the frontend servers if I like to fix the the
vulnerability?
greetings,
Oliver
>> On 2 Sep 2019, at 11.01, MK via dovecot wrote:
>>
>> Good Morning List,
>>
>> just a short question to this vulnerability. We are using a setup with
>> dovecot redirector/proxy frontend servers
>> and some backend server, which store the mailboxe
rebuilding indexes
Sep 02 13:00:22 doveadm: Warning: Transaction log file
/var/spool/mail//storage/dovecot.map.index.log was locked for 48
seconds (mdbox storage rebuild)
Sep 02 13:00:23 doveadm: Warning: fscking index file
/var/spool/mail//storage/dovecot.map.index
On 26.08.19 18:06, sch tel v
if it's still the same pid, yes:
7584 13.2 1.5 221168 63508 ?R12:48 3:36
dovecot/doveadm-server
On 02.09.19 13:13, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
Any idea what pid 7584 is?
Aki
On 2.9.2019 14.08, telsch via dovecot wrote:
Hello,
today i got reappearing mails again, bu
On 9/2/19 1:32 PM, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> On 2.9.2019 14.27, Bas van Rooijen via dovecot wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> From the v2.2.36.4 announcement message: "Binary packages are available at
>> https://repo.dovecot.org/";
>>
>> My ques
Hi,
is there already a release date for Debian Buster packages?
kind regards
Christian
Hi,
you can now find experimental Docker images for dovecot CE releases (starting
from 2.3.7.2) from
https://hub.docker.com/r/dovecot/dovecot
You can find instructions and more details on the repository page.
Aki
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2/09/19 11:53 PM, bvr--- via dovecot wrote:
Sorry, there are no 2.2 binary packages on
repo.dovecot.org.
No problem, thanks for the info!
GhettoForge has 2.2 packages for CentOS / RHEL / SL, etc in the gf-plus
repostitory:
www.ghettoforge.org
Peter
Hello.
This is a question about the imap protocol, since I am having a hard
time finding these things out, so I hope you guys can help me. We are
using Dovecot to receive mails and having an issue with Thunderbird.
Basically, we are running into this bug with a lot of people:
https://bugzilla
Am 30.08.2019 um 08:10 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot :
>
>
> On 29.8.2019 12.30, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote:
>>
>>> Am 29.08.2019 um 11:23 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot :
>>>
>>>
>>> On 29.8.2019 12.18, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote:
>>
Hi,
Can global ACLs for public folders be stored in SQL or LDAP instead of a
dovecot-acl file?
I could only find something for shared folders, but not for public folders?
Thanks in advance
Christian
Hi,
as Dovecot supports submission, which is the sending direction, I am interested
to know, if I can configure a separate passdb backend just for submission.
I habe LDAP attributes that differ sending or receiving permissions. It would
be nice, if I had a second passdb backend just for submiss
> Am 03.09.2019 um 10:54 schrieb Sami Ketola via dovecot :
>
>
>
>> On 3 Sep 2019, at 11.07, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> as Dovecot supports submission, which is the sending direction, I am
>> interested to know, if I
On 2019.08.28. 15:10, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
Steps to reproduce:
This bug is best observed using valgrind to see the out of bounds read
with following snippet:
perl -e 'print "a id (\"foo\" \"".("x"x1021)."\\A\" \"bar\"
\"
On 2019.09.03. 22:32, KSB via dovecot wrote:
On 2019.08.28. 15:10, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
Steps to reproduce:
This bug is best observed using valgrind to see the out of bounds read
with following snippet:
perl -e 'print "a id (\"foo\" \"".("x"
Do I have to replace the "password" part with the actual password or can I just
copy it like that?
Will dovecot create the keypair automatically or do I have to use doveadm?
4. Sep. 2019, 08:33 von aki.tu...@open-xchange.com:
>
>
>
> On 4.9.2019 9.21, Dustin Schoenwolf
cot.org/configuration_manual/config_file/config_variables/
> <https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/config_file/config_variables/>>
> for details.
>
>
> Key management is pretty much the most difficult thing in mail crypt
> plugin =)
>
>
> Aki
&
On 1 Sep 2019, at 15:53, Michael Hallager wrote:
> On 2019-09-02 06:24, Alexander Dalloz via dovecot wrote:
>> Am 01.09.2019 um 14:41 schrieb Aleksandr Mette via dovecot:
>>> 4. Forward e-mail
>> Don't do that nor let your users auto-forward their mail received on
>
> Am 04.09.2019 um 08:24 schrieb Sami Ketola via dovecot :
>
>
>
>> On 3 Sep 2019, at 19.08, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote:
>>
>> I tried this, but I have done something wrong probably.
>>
>> I added this to 20-imap 20-pop 20-managesieve and 20-submi
On 2 Sep 2019, at 02:08, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Unless you run a big install with lots of accounts where it can be handy to
> use some sort of meta tool (modoboa, postfixadmin, ...) there is zero need
> for an SQL backend.
It is much easier to manage users, even a few users, via a database t
On 4 Sep 2019, at 07:26, @lbutlr wrote:
> with IMAP logging and local rules.
IMAP logins.
--
"640K ought to be enough RAM for anybody." - Bill Gates, 1981
> Am 04.09.2019 um 15:31 schrieb R.N.S. via dovecot :
>
>
>
>> Am 04.09.2019 um 08:24 schrieb Sami Ketola via dovecot :
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 3 Sep 2019, at 19.08, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote:
>>>
>>> I tried this, but I have done so
On 3 Sep 2019, at 00:32, d.gent...@m4ever.de wrote:
> This is a question about the imap protocol, since I am having a hard time
> finding these things out, so I hope you guys can help me. We are using
> Dovecot to receive mails and having an issue with Thunderbird. ⌘
You and most everyone who u
> Am 04.09.2019 um 16:58 schrieb Sami Ketola via dovecot :
>
>
>
>> On 4 Sep 2019, at 16.38, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote:
>>>
>>> passdb {
>>> args = /etc/dovecot/master-users
>>> driver = passwd-file
>>> master = yes
&g
> Am 04.09.2019 um 18:32 schrieb R.N.S. via dovecot :
>
>
>
>> Am 04.09.2019 um 16:58 schrieb Sami Ketola via dovecot :
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 4 Sep 2019, at 16.38, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote:
>>>>
>>>> passdb {
>>>
> Am 03.09.2019 um 10:01 schrieb R.N.S. via dovecot :
>
> Hi,
>
> Can global ACLs for public folders be stored in SQL or LDAP instead of a
> dovecot-acl file?
>
> I could only find something for shared folders, but not for public folders?
Is there somebody who does
Hi List,
after upgrading dovecot from version 2.2.33.2 to 2.3.7.2 I got a lot of error
messages like the following if the process count of imap processes reaches
nearly 1000 (~950 (there are a few pop-connections)).
Sep 5 11:27:32 mailbox1 dovecot: imap-login: Internal login failure (pid=27728
Hello
I changed our old gcc compiler from the version: gcc-4.1.2-13.fc6 to the
newer
one: gcc version 8.3.0 (GCC). Then I wanted to compile: Dovecot 2.3.7
and I get
the following error with ./configure
CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/local/openssl/include" \
LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/openssl/lib" \
./configure
What is the best way to adopt multiple certs?
Thanks.
On Sep 8, 2019, at 03:48, Henrik Johansson wrote:
> Well I got the OpenSSL parts working now, but newer versions still refuses to
> work after establishing with ECDHE, I just get no login attempts and no user:
iOS 13 definitely works with dovecot; it’s how I am able to send this mail.
--
My ma
On 8 Sep 2019, at 12:11, Daniel Miller wrote:
> Seems reasonable. Now, with a non-existent mailbox...
> doveadm mailbox list -u bogus
> returns "bogus"
>
> doveadm mailbox list -u bogus*
> returns ""
>
> Is this a bug or correct behavior?
Seems like a bug. If it is correct IO can’
On 9 Sep 2019, at 07:47, James Brown wrote:
> Should I use a Dovecot process, rsync, a Mac app like Arq or Jungle Disk, or
> something else?
I do not have specific experience with using S3, but if rsync is possible that
is always my first choice, though if you want to backup to prevent ransomwa
Hello,
I migrated our mail infrastructure to Dovecot on Ubuntu 18.04 some months
ago. It works fine, but recently some users told me that they sometime
receive duplicated emails. Same email content, same headers including
message-id.
I'm using two dovecot servers on two sites. Both server are in
On 9 Sep 2019, at 09:27, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
> The moment I remove those folders, the size gets calculated correctly.
> Unfortunately those folders are generated by some clients automatically afaik
> (like .INBOX.Trash)
That sounds like a misconfiguration of the IMAP client. Someone has go
On 9 Sep 2019, at 10:08, Francis wrote:
> Where should I look to diagnostic this issue?
Look at the raw stored messages. Your MTA probably has an internal ID (queuid
in postfix) that should tell you if the messages are getting duped before they
get to dovecot.
the raw messages should have time
Actually the mail isn't saved corrupted. The bug is when reading the
mail. So any existing corrupted mails become fixed after upgrading.
Fix here:
https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/5068b11e594ad7cc1f7cedf2bd9280520e0e534d
Could this also apply to this Timo? We also using attachment_dir w
Le lun. 9 sept. 2019 à 12:08, Francis a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I migrated our mail infrastructure to Dovecot on Ubuntu 18.04 some months
> ago. It works fine, but recently some users told me that they sometime
> receive duplicated emails. Same email content, same headers including
> message-id.
>
>
On Sep 11, 2019, at 1:25 PM, Klaus Steinberger
wrote:
> I never saw any mail system in which the local Part ist Case sensitive!
Every Unix/Linux system (I’d say that represents the majority of mail systems)
has a case sensitive local part. Most mail admins have set their systems up to
normaliz
401 - 500 of 6363 matches
Mail list logo
