More about IMAP, less about Dovecot.
This is more an IMAP question than specifically about Dovecot. Sorry to
ask here but I've been researching, reading and lurking with no answer
so far.
What I'm doing is running reports as a user from a remote system to
provide a list of messages (Sender/
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 5/7/2008, Roderick A. Anderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Is there a method as a client from a remote system to make changes to
a message then save it back? What is the IMAP verb, command, etc. to
do this?
Man, if you could, that would be really, really bad
Samuel HAMEAU wrote:
Hi,
I know this request is a a little off-topic but may be interesting for
dovecot users (at least i hope!)
Does anybody has already had an experience with a calendar sharing
solution including a webcalendar and an outlook connector, "compatible"
with dovecot ?
Today, th
There was a thread several weeks (or months) ago on webmail applications.
I didn't like any of the options and only found few that I did but they
were either expensive or not maintained.
So ... I raised the question on the Catalyst Framework list about Perl
based webmail apps and got nothing
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Aug 13, 2008, at 4:05 PM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
What I'm looking for is a good reference, besides the RFC, on IMAP.
Anything out there? Electronic or dead-tree is fine. (A book of
Dovecot would be neat too.)
I wrote this a while ago: http://imapwik
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 04:37:11PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
One thing that would be nice, that pretty much no webmail does, is to
keep a stateful connection open all the time (or at least some of the
time) instead of creating tons of short-liv
mouss wrote:
Blake Carver wrote:
I'm trying to help someone with Dovecot, and it looks like this one is
a few versions behind.
They say that they're not sure if it was installed Via an RPM or a
source tarball. Dovecot is use MySQL.
This is a RHEL5 server. There are RPMs listed as installed (rp
HEL 5. CentOS 5, etc.
BUT
dovecot --version shows me a different #
Meaning your are not running the RPM installed version.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Roderick A. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unless, like he said above it may have been installed via a tarball.
dovecot --
Anyone know of a /complete/ step-by-step HOWTO for setting up a system
using Postfix, Dovecot, and Deliver? I'm looking to put a new mail
server together that will host three domains with pretty low volumes of
email. Later adding three or four more for some non-profits that I host.
I'm findi
he does some pretty good skips that leave me with questions.
I think I have it up a working but need to do some testing.
Rod
--
Fred
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 13:04 -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Anyone know of a /complete/ step-by-step HOWTO for setting up a system
using Postfix, Dovecot
Carlos Williams wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 4:43 PM, pod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe you need to subscribe to your new "test" folder from your
Thunderbird session.
I am not sure I follow. When I am in Thunderbird and I create a new
"subfolder" under my Inbox, it shows up on the emal ser
Markus Reymann wrote:
Hi,
I set up my Services using this howto:
http://workaround.org/articles/ispmail-etch/
Thanks Markus. This looks very promising. Between an example I
received and what I've done so far hopefully I'll have it today.
The interesting issue right now is I think I've go
takes on the process.
Right now I'm fighting Postfix and TLS. Mostly missing (never
generated) files.
Turned off TLS and now I'm getting a dovecot-deliver.log file error from
Postfix.
Oh well. I'll keep on plugging at it.
Rod
--
On 02/10/08 23:23:06, Roderick A. Anderson
My saga continues, with a few interruptions, to configure a new mail
server for several domains.
I've had one private post, and read a dozen of more HOWTOs, HOWDONEs,
blogs, and posts on doing this but still haven't had any joy. Not quite
sure what I got configured incorrectly so before doing
I know I'm looking at the answer but probably not seeing it on the Wiki?
Is there a "manual" for Dovecot?
Or ... where do I find all the options for the userdb and passdb options?
While trying to get my head wrapped around this I noticed I might have
been mixing args between the two. One exam
I'm a bit further along but haven't figured out why Authentication is
still failing. I've tried a telnet to port 143 and openssl connection
to 993.
The command I issued, per the debugging page on the wiki, is:
a login [EMAIL PROTECTED] crap
Here is a snapshot from my logs (yup second
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Oct 7, 2008, at 12:40 AM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
I know I'm looking at the answer but probably not seeing it on the Wiki?
Is there a "manual" for Dovecot?
Wiki is all there is.
Or ... where do I find all the options for the userdb and
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Oct 7, 2008, at 6:33 PM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Oct 7 08:17:20 mx0 dovecot: auth(default):
passwd-file([EMAIL PROTECTED],66.193.34.88): unknown user
It's looking up [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the file.
info:{PLAIN}crap:5000:5000::/var/mail/vhosts/aesoft-sbc
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Oct 7, 2008, at 7:16 PM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
So use:
passdb passwd-file {
args = username_format=%n /var/mail/vhosts/%d/passwd
}
Well these did seem to be set correctly (I've been experimenting with
different settings).
Here is a portion of "
As I said in a previous reply the server is going great. In fact I can
even send mail via it. (On the really old server I'm moving from I
couldn't get authentication for outbound to work.)
I now have a couple of small issues to deal with before moving
completely off the old system.
Virtual
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 10/7/2008, Roderick A. Anderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Virtual domains aliases? My reading seems to indicate that Postfix
only handles aliases in one place/file. Ie., I can't use a
/var/mail/vhosts/domain.tld/aliases.
Do you want actual aliases, or just vi
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 10/7/2008, Roderick A. Anderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Damn! I just removed everything from the virtual_mailbox_maps file
and now have no delivery of mail. So it looks like I have to have an
entry for every user in every domain in the file/map
(vmailbox
I'm working at the next part of the virtual domains mail server. I'm
moving this account ([EMAIL PROTECTED] is a forwarder) which has a bunch
of procmail rules to file into folders.
My question is if it is more efficient is use?
if {
...
} elsif {
...
} elsif {
...
}
else
This seem
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Seth Mattinen escreveu:
Seth, Eduardo;
Thanks.
Seth,
As I read your post -- slap went my hand to my forehead. I knew that!
That was the subconsciouses reason I asked I'm sure. :-)
Eduardo,
You're right. What I'm doing, currently, isn't all that complicate
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 11:12 +0200, Claudio Prono wrote:
Very strange, i have tryied to chmod 666 all log files, like that:
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 681 Oct 8 11:08 dovecot-err.log
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 1039 Oct 8 11:02 dovecot-inf.log
(Is terrible i know, but only a test
There is a project (catmail) to build a webmail front end using the
Catalyst Framework and the question came up about multiple connections
per user.
Specifically the question was:
"The IMAP server can support multiple connections, but do you think the
backend should support multiple connection
Can I have a master users list for each virtual domain? I'm not sure
from what I read on the page:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/MasterUsers
auth default {
mechanisms = plain login CRAM-MD5
passdb passwd-file {
args = /var/mail/vhosts/%d/passwd.masterusers
mast
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Oct 15, 2008, at 11:19 PM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Can I have a master users list for each virtual domain? I'm not sure
from what I read on the page:
Not really. There are two possibilities that I can think of:
a) Use passdb checkpassword and verify tha
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 06:28 -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Does the IMAP specification call for Master Users (I don't remember
seeing it?)
No.
Or is this an implementation specific (Dovecot, et al.)
_feature_?
Yes.
How difficult would it be to make per-d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 30, 2008, at 2:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maildir is nice compared to mbox but it really isn’t optimal. In days
where IOPS is the most difficult resource to get into your server (and
dovecot already using close to nothing in terms of CPU time and
memory)
havi
I'm still searching but hoping someone can offer a clue-stick.
Long story short! I had a server crash suddenly and all I can get at
are the files. Built a new host and copied the data and config files
over, correcting ownership and permissions (hopefully) as I went.
But now I can't get logg
Along with my post about authentication I was wondering if anyone was
building RPMs for the later versions of dovecot (and postfix) than I can
find in the usual and not-so-usual yum repos?
I already pull from rpmforge but would prefer something later than 1.0.7
Say the 1.1 series.
Thanks,
Please excuse the top post and the really bad grammar in the previous
message!
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2/3/2009 12:33 PM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Along with my post about authentication I was wondering if anyone was
building RPMs for the later versions of
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2/3/2009 12:33 PM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Along with my post about authentication I was wondering if anyone was
building RPMs for the later versions of dovecot (and postfix) than I can
find in the usual and not-so-usual yum repos?
I already pull from rpmforge but
At this point I don't think I can do anymore damage to my mail server
but I'd like to know if anyone else is using the pre-built RPM files
from ATrpms before I install them?
http://dl.atrpms.net/all/dovecot-1.1.11-0_90.el5.i386.rpm
http://dl.atrpms.net/all/dovecot-sieve-1.1.6-9.el5.i386.rpm
O
I don't know what to call what I'm trying to do so I'll explain the
situation.
I had a total complete crash of the Linux-Vserver system that was
hosting a Postfix+Dovecot guest with a three domains and 1-5 accounts
per domain. Lots of mail though.
Before it completely melted down I as able
Patrick Nagel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Roderick,
On 2009-02-07 05:48, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
| At this point I don't think I can do anymore damage to my mail server
| but I'd like to know if anyone else is using the pre-built RPM files
| from ATrpm
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
the list give me no results. No list of folders.
If you see no folders, the problem is not the indexes. I suspect that
dovecot now uses other mail_location settings than
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
I don't know what to call what I'm trying to do so I'll explain the
situation.
It was the typical case of too many things going on at the same time and
me in a full-bore-linear-panic over the crashed mail server.
The biggies were:
1) The vmail
ould be nice to see the latest or nearly latest available via a
simple yum update.
Rod
--
On 2009-02-07 05:48, Roderick A. Anderson wrote: | At this point
I don't think I can do anymore damage to my mail server | but I'd
like to know if anyone else is using the pre-built RPM files |
I'm trying to figure out a way, or if it is even possible, to use
mailing list software (majordomo2) on a Postfix + Dovecot + virtual
mailboxes system. And where I should be looking.
The examples on the Postfix site don't seem to address a purely virtual
mailboxes system and I haven't found a
Dave McGuire wrote:
On Feb 10, 2009, at 4:24 PM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
I'm trying to figure out a way, or if it is even possible, to use
mailing list software (majordomo2) on a Postfix + Dovecot + virtual
mailboxes system. And where I should be looking.
The examples on the Po
Guillaume HILT wrote:
Hi,
I'm using dovecot 1.1.7 on Gentoo with Postfix and PostfixAdmin to
manage my virtual users.
I'm trying to use sieve (which has been compiled with Dovecot) but it
doesn't work.
I added cmusieve in the lda protocol :
mail_plugins = cmusieve
mail_plugin_dir = /u
Guillaume HILT wrote:
Roderick A. Anderson a écrit :
Guillaume HILT wrote:
Hi,
I'm using dovecot 1.1.7 on Gentoo with Postfix and PostfixAdmin to
manage my virtual users.
I'm trying to use sieve (which has been compiled with Dovecot) but it
doesn't work.
I added cmus
Guillaume HILT wrote:
I don't have any sieve error file.
Do you have and messages in the dovecot (or postfix) log files that
relate to 'sieve'?
Here is the one I got when I'd forgotten to install dovecot-sieve (yum
or rpm)
deliver(i...@mydomain.com): Feb 03 08:39:27 Fatal: Plugin
cmusi
Guillaume Hilt wrote:
Alex a écrit :
Guillaume HILT wrote:
Upgrade done and running, but it didn't fixed the problem :x
Alex a écrit :
I had been the same issue with 1.1.7. Try to unmask the 1.1.10-r1
and install; it solve my issue.
Do you see anything in your log?
Nothing about sieve.
Anyone aware of a Web User Interface or GUI to allow users to create
simple/common-type sieve scripts?
I found the sieve testing and have used it as I play; plus mangesieve
(and Net:ManageSieve.pm) but want to allow users to build so some
clicking and maybe a little typing and then end up with
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Peter Lindgren wrote:
Roderick A. Anderson skrev:
Anyone aware of a Web User Interface or GUI to allow users to create
simple/common-type sieve scripts?
So before I go invent this wheel I'd like to know what others are doing?
For Thunderbird, there's a plugin
I was thinking about all the old email I have and don't want to get rid
of and how much space it is taking on my mail server. The idea came to
me to install Dovecot on a server at home then I could drop mail into I
want to save. It doesn't need to receive mail except what that is moved
to it
A customer is suffering with an older version of a Windows "Mail Server"
software that does not permit connections to _other_ ports (25 only).
Several of the domains they host have users who's ISPs block port 25 so
they can not send mail.
They'd like to set up an outbound (relay?) SMTP server
Jonathan wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
deliver is the binary name. but it's configured inside protocol lda {}
section. This is getting annoying, any thoughts on what would be a good
unifying name?
c) dovecot-lda binary, protocol lda {}
I'd vote for C as well.
++c
\\||/
Rod
--
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 15:33 -0300, Darvin Denmian wrote:
Hello list,
i need to know if is possible to create a log file per domain, like:
/home/vmail/%d/maillog
i'm thinking use : log_path = /home/vmail/%d/maillog , this will work?
No. Not possible currently, unless you r
Alexander Johannes wrote:
Hello,
i have a annoying problem with dovecot after updating to 1.1.14.
Dovecot seems to empty all cur/ and new/ Folders in the Maildir of a
particular user several times a day (3 times so far). It leaves only
unread messages in their place. All Index-Files are getti
I don't remember sing any mention come across the list reference the
Subject line and nothing shows up within the first three pages of a
Google search.
Anyone know of a YUM repo. RPM or spec file for Dovecot 2.0 and friends?
TIA,
Rod
--
Alan Brown wrote:
> From: "Roderick A. Anderson"
> Subject: [Dovecot] RHEL5/CentOS5 YUM repo, rpm, or spec file for 2.0?
>
> I don't remember sing any mention come across the list reference the
> Subject line and nothing shows up within the first thr
Jerrale G wrote:
On 10/26/2010 1:14 AM, Oli Schacher wrote:
Anyone know of a YUM repo. RPM or spec file for Dovecot 2.0 and friends?
http://packages.atrpms.net/dist/el5/dovecot/
I haven't tried the 2.0 rpms yet, but we were very happy with the
1.0/1.1/1.2 packages on centos
last time I che
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 12:24 -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Alan Brown wrote:
ATrpms has builds too, but they're usually out of date.
Yeah way of of date. 1.0.7 I think is what I saw.
Hm, ATrpms is usually shipping packages within a few days after a
release as we
Rick Romero wrote:
Quoting "Marcus Rueckert" :
On 2010-03-04 15:27:20 -0600, Rick Romero wrote:
I'm by no means a procmail expert, but this seems to work (though
[Dovecot] gets put before the Re:)
and with an LDA that speaks only sieve?
how do you do it there?
This is better for procmail
Jerrale Gayle wrote:
When mail is sent from the mail server, it shows up as originating from
the MAIN ip address of the server, 173.50.101.11, when the mail server
is bound to 173.50.101.12. I have already set smtp_bind_address:
173.50.101.12 in main.cf and 173.50.101.12:smtp inet - - smtpd in
On 07/07/2010 09:15 AM, A. J. Giurato wrote:
OK, Dovecot is showing those folders correctly from telnet.
However, I can't subscribe to them in Thunderbird 3.0.5 (they don't even
appear) and I don't even know that squirrelmail 1.4.13 has a subscribe
feature.
You did "refresh" the Folder list ..
Read what I could find on possible upgrade issues and saw only one that
might be a problem. I don't think it will but figured it was worth
checking.
Anything jump out at the more experienced users?
dovecot -n (edited to protect the guilty. ie. me) attached.
# 1.1.11: /etc/dovecot.conf
# OS
I realize this is sorta off topic but my searches using Google have got
me mostly no where. So I thought I'd ask here as there is a lot of
_past Postfix_ mail handling issues discussed.
The issue is; I have to deal with a lot of messages that come from MS
Outlook users and sometimes they are
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Anyone have a suggestion of how to _strip_ multiple line feeds from a
message? Is there a sieve method/way? I don't want to fiddle with
all the users emails just m
Noel Butler wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 20:01 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
It's beginning to sound like I should add "lmtp_headers" setting where
you could do all kinds of "interesting" things like:
lmtp_headers = \
Return-Path: %f\n \
Envelope-To: %t\n \
X-Envelope-To: %t\n \
X-Origi
Charles Marcus wrote:
Hey Timo,
I have a question regarding how dovecot might behave if a mail client
(like, for example, Thunderbird) decided to store some of its config
files on the IMAP server itself.
Would there be a decent way of doing this with dovecot that wouldn't
cause problems for oth
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Is this the expected behaviour ?
Yes.
Thanks for any clarification.
The MUA must actively request the status of the mailfolders. The INBOX
and the currently selected folder ar
66 matches
Mail list logo
