On 12/2/18 5:58 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
> Lots of posts around about this, all self serving :)
>
> There may of course be an RFC floating around, but I admit to never
> having bothered to look, because good netizens reply to list, lists are
> public, they are for the masses - the membership - the
Andy,
This is just rude. You have been told multiple times that the less-than
symbol is required to read the certificate from the file. Otherwise,
the filename is parsed as if it is the certificate itself. Which yields
garbage.
If dovecot can't read that file, it is *not* dovecot's fault. You
On 09/28/2015 10:18 AM, Marco Fretz wrote:
> On 28.09.2015 10:48, Andreas Meyer wrote:
>> For my understanding it should not be possible to connect to server
>> server.aaa.de with an address line u...@bbb.de and dovecot serves
>> the mailbox of that user.
> the dovecot service does not care about
On 01/09/2012 08:38 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/8/2012 3:07 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
[...]
>> (Are my words making any sense? I got the feeling I'm writing German with
>> English words and nobody is really understanding anything ...)
>
> You're making perfect sense, and frankly, if not for the
On 06/08/2011 05:58 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
[...]
>
> The point is that when you set the headers correctly on your message, a
> reply from someone on your message will not generate a duplicate in the
> first place, thereby eliminating your problem even before it exists :)
To add a data point, thi
On 06/08/2011 07:05 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> On 09/06/11 00:47, Phil Turmel wrote:
>> On 06/08/2011 05:58 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote: [...]
>>>
>>> The point is that when you set the headers correctly on your
>>> message, a reply from someone on your message will
Hi Denny,
On 06/22/2011 07:19 AM, Denny Schierz wrote:
> I want to use two backends für DoveCot. One generated file from the LDAP
> tree, and the real LDAP.
>
> The first backend is generated from a cronjob thats reads the whole ldap
> server and converts them into a DoveCot passwd file.
OK.
>
Hi Daniel,
On 06/27/2011 02:40 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Maybe a little off-topic - but I hope not too much.
>
> Looking for some insight on setting up Dovecot under a virtual server. In
> particular, I use VirtualBox - and at the moment, Ubuntu Linux.
>
> Initial questions on configuratio
On 09/04/2012 12:40 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2012-09-04 12:37 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> Almost every message I'm getting through this list is duplicated, down
>> to the same exact message-ID...
>>
>> Anyone else seeing this?
>
> Even this one was duplicated...
Not here :-)
Phil
On 03/13/2013 01:51 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 3/13/2013 12:00 AM, Alex wrote:
> I just verified that TB (17.0.4) won't do STARTTLS on TCP 143 without
> first accepting the self signed cert.
>
>> I'm really hoping someone can help me to clarify more specifically
>> what's going on here.
>
> Y
On 2/17/19 4:00 AM, Odhiambo Washington via dovecot wrote:
I have built a new server (FreeBSD-12) running dovecot-2.3.4.
My old server (FreeBSD-9.3) is running dovecot-2.3.4 as well.
The configurations are 1:1 identical.
The are about 250 users on this server, all virtual. They are mostly POP3
us
On 3/14/19 7:40 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski via dovecot wrote:
Sorry I have to write this, but this is again pointing people in a fake
security direction.
You should be sorry, because you are wrong.
The only valid authority for a certificate is the party using it. Any third
party with unknow
On 3/14/19 10:08 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski via dovecot wrote:
Some facts for you, as obviously you have not understood what a CA is worth
that is compromised by either hackers or "authorities".
If you want to know more, read articles about closing of CA DigiNotar, like:
https://en.wikipedia.or
13 matches
Mail list logo
