On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 07:53 -0400, Jerry wrote:
> There has been chatter on the FreeBSD forum regarding introducing the
> new 2.x release into the ports system. Personally, I have advised
> against it unless the port is clearly marked as "USE AT OWN RISK". Timo
> appears to be introducing patche
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 14:20 +0200, Jakob Curdes wrote:
> All true, but there is a current 1.2.14 out there which should probably
> be preferred ove a two-and-a-half year old 1.0.15.
> Jakob
>
Indeed, but some people who use certain distros are scared shitless of
using source packages and will
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 13:32 +0100, arif khwaja wrote:
> Dear All,
> I have Centos 5 and devecot 1.0.7 I want to upgrade it to the latest version.
> I will appreciate if any one can tell me how can I upgrade it please.
>
>
use the source, luke :) from the website
I suggest using 1.2.14, exp
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 08:59 -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:37:25 +1000
> Noel Butler articulated:
>
> > Indeed, but some people who use certain distros are scared shitless of
> > using source packages and will insist on using a several yo version
> >
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 11:15 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> regard, even though Debian Stable, AMD64, has 17,914 packages. I'm
> guessing that compares favorably to any Linux distro. Even with that
> many packages, on occasion, you're going to want one that isn't in that
> 17,914.
>
Yeah, but
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 15:46 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> You can also just decrease login_process_max_count. If Dovecot reaches
> the limit, it'll just start killing off old connections that haven't
> logged in.
>
What would be nice is, an anti brute force option, like xinetd, X-number
of con
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 18:31 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 07:48 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> > What would be nice is, an anti brute force option, like xinetd, X-number
> > of connections from Y i.p. in Z seconds (optional setting of course) or
> > maybe
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 09:33 +0300, Amr Shahin wrote:
> Hello,
> please find this log from dovecot server
> * OK Dovecot ready.
> 1 login amrtest3 *
> 1 OK Logged in.
> 1 getquotaroot inbox
> * QUOTAROOT "inbox"
> 1 OK Getquotaroot completed.
> 1 logout
> * BYE Logging out
> 1 OK Logout com
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 17:59 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> (I'm also wondering about if it should be the first rule. Somehow to me
I think first rule match is best approach, as someone else pointed out,
its how many things that most people here would work with daily work, be
it a server daemo
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 19:28 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 09:20 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 17:59 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > (I'm also wondering about if it should be the first rul
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 01:41 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Aug 19, 2009, at 1:37 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> > others have found this problem ?
>
> Dovecot auth isn't case-insensitive. But MySQL is, and I guess you're
> using it? There are several different ways around it.
Which is not a
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 12:33 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> In Dovecot v2.0 I'm splitting dovecot-example.conf to multiple files.
> It's probably annoying to have tons of dovecot-*-example.conf files, so
> what do you think about:
>
> 1. Change default sysconfdir from $prefix/etc to $prefix/etc/dov
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 11:07 -0400, David Halik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just looking for some advice on avoiding getting DoS'd from brute
> force log in attempts. We came in this morning to find that one of our
> Solaris 9 dovecot severs had wedged overnight due to a brute force
> connection att
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 15:05 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Shutting down Dovecot doesn't shut down deliver, since it's called by
> Postfix.
>
However, if you use its SASL, that's not entirely true if you're
relying on normal message injection methods (smtpd), postfix will bail.
/etc/rc.d/rc.do
tes after.
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
L.C.P #251002 (http://counter.li.org)
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefor remains strictly confidential and is protected
unde
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 07:25 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 10:06 -0400, Mario Antonio wrote:
>
> > Has anybody noticed this behavior when using maildir quota with Version
> > 1.2.4:
>
>
>
> >
> > When I change quota at the S
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 18:56 -0400, Mario Antonio wrote:
> Noel,
>
> Thanks a lot for your help.
> But with this behavior, we will have to modify our scripts to perhaps
> clear up/reset the cache after changing User Quotas
Hi Mario,
You could try setting it to value of "0" not too sur
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 06:12 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 9/18/2009, Gabriele (listarolo_dove...@musimac.it) wrote:
> > dovecot 1.0.10
>
> This is really old... it is very likely that upgrading dovecot to a more
> current build - either 1.1.19, or better, 1.2.5 - will solve your
> problem, bu
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 15:56 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
> No\"{e}l, I don't think such findings belong here.
>
> Ubuntu 8.04 is a long-term support release (desktop three years, server five
> years), and it's natural that users will use that.
>
Really? I had not realised ubuntu wrote Dov
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 11:11 -0500, Eric Jon Rostetter wrote:
> > I have never understood anyone who would use a distro for critical
> > applications that forces them to use 3+ year old software.
>
> Because it is stable and just plain works, of course.
Oh what rubbish, ubuntu released a brand
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 16:26 -0500, Eric Jon Rostetter wrote:
>
> No... Really, I've got lots of machines on older distros (3+ years)
> that are just plain stable and just plain work.
>
until they are owned.
> > cant recall if it was 8.04 or 8.10,
>
> Well, that's helpful... Since the cu
On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 13:46 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > BTW its not natural, it might be to the newbies and SOHO's, but most
> > people who know what they doing use source packages, because they can
> > compile them to their own liking.
>
> Sounds like a case for Gentoo Linux, FreeBSD/NetB
ahh just found this in my spam folder.. maybe it has good judgement
On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 21:22 -0500, Eric Jon Rostetter wrote:
> Quoting Noel Butler :
>
> >> No... Really, I've got lots of machines on older distros (3+ years)
> >> that are just pla
g issues, as it should give a good random sampling.
>
Yep sure would help to nut it out a bit mire
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
L.C.P #251002 (http://counter.li.org)
This Email, including any attachments, may con
y mail server is rejecting
> > the
> > > vacation email's.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > sounds interesting, but I can't reproduce it.
> > When you send an email to:
> >dovecot_test + vacation-test @ localdomain . org
> > you will get an auto r
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 08:05 -0500, Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:51:26 +0100
> selaci selaci replied:
>
> I guess he was in such a hurry to start on his vacation that he
> neglected to leave a message.
LOL I was thinking that too :)
ith --enable-header-install, then build cmusieve and
install it.
but he appears to have currently installed, the normal sieve plugin, so
the LDA section needs to be changed to reflect the correct plugin.
--
Kind Regards,
SSA Noel Butler
L.C.P #251002 (http://co
>
> It's right there at the bottom of your list.
>
No, that's sieve, not cmusieve
--
Kind Regards,
SSA Noel Butler
L.C.P #251002 (http://counter.li.org)
This Email, including any attachments, may contai
easily adjusted to those who
use Slackware, CentOS, or any *nix version.
--
Kind Regards,
SSA Noel Butler
L.C.P No. 251002
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore remains confi
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 08:07 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 12/3/2009, Jerry (ges...@yahoo.com) wrote:
> >> Don't do that, it wastes time and breaks archives (when the pastebin
> >> file goes away.
> >>
> >> Just paste it in the email body...
> >>
> >> (yes this is a peeve of mine)
>
> > Whic
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 10:26 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2009, at 4:48 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
>
> > /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf:
> > mail_location = maildir:/var/spool/dovecot/domains/%d/%n
> >
> > /usr/local/etc/dovecot-ldap.conf:
> > user_attrs = mailQuotaSize=quota_rule=*:stor
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 18:20 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 08:58 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> > So, in using...
> >
> > user_query = select 26 as uid, 26 as gid, '/var/vmail/%d/%1n/%1.1n/%
> > 2.1n/%n' as home,
> >
> > mail
how you are authing, it's near
impossible to give guidance, but if you are using mysql, the
change_sqlpass plugin is what you want, its also very easy to modify it
to change other passwords stored in mysql like ftp/http auth
at same time.
--
Kind Regards,
SSA Noel Butler
L.C.P No.
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 16:21 -0500, Jerry wrote:
> > Dunno. Above the private field appears to be "-" (the one after
> > unix). I don't know why Postfix would see it as "--n".
>
> Maybe asking Wietse Venema might prove
> insightful.
>
wouldnt do that, he gets very touchy with people emailing
On Fri, 2010-01-01 at 06:52 -0500, Gerard wrote:
> Second, I totally disagree with your claim that his mail forum is
> useless. I have on several occasions posted quires and received rapid
> responses. By the way, I do not remember seeing your post on the forum.
Yep, I got a copy of it back so i
These comments coming from you, are not surprising given who you are, so
i wont bother this list with any further reply, because i'm sure the
other trolls and fanbois will come out the woodwork..
On Fri, 2010-01-01 at 18:49 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
> > he wants people to sub to his useles
On Fri, 2010-01-01 at 19:00 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> >> What has this got to do with anything, It was well before Christmas.
>
> > It was 12/10/09... two weeks... pretty close if you ask me, lots of
> > people take 2-3 week vacations during this time of year.
>
> Oh... and the only messa
On Sat, 2010-01-02 at 09:45 +0100, Thomas Zajic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been getting these warnings in syslog since I've been running
> (Linux) kernels 2.6.31.x and up (I'm currently at 2.6.32.2), they
> do not show up on 2.6.30.x kernels.
>
> Dovecot versions involved were/are 1.2.x, I'm currentl
ot-postfix.conf but
> unfortunately also puts the default dovecot.conf in /etc/dovecot
> (driving everyone crazy who blindly follows howtos editing
> dovecot.conf). Highly recommended to remove/rename dovecot.conf in this
> co
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 12:43 -0500, Jerry wrote:
>
> Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning, "I can’t install Debian."
Jerry, you debian people steal everything, its... Ubuntu is an ancient
African word meaning, "I can’t install Slackware." :P
--
Kind Regards
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 07:10 -0500, Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:01:48 +1000 Noel Butler
> articulated:
>
> > > Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning, "I can’t install Debian."
> >
> > Jerry, you debian people steal everything, its... Ubunt
-name *,ST -exec rm {} \;
>
> I'd use -ctime.
and I'd go a little further by replacing -exec rm ... with -print
| /usr/bin/perl -nle 'unlink;'
--
Kind Regards,
SSA Noel Butler
L.C.P No. 251002
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 20:01 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> It's beginning to sound like I should add "lmtp_headers" setting where
> you could do all kinds of "interesting" things like:
>
> lmtp_headers = \
> Return-Path: %f\n \
> Envelope-To: %t\n \
> X-Envelope-To: %t\n \
> X-Original
> imap append (because it would give user an error message directly).
I certainly wouldn't want to accept a message in this case, user might
be 1K under quota, but get 20m file
now that might be a whoopie doo :) but what if 130K u
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 06:10 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
> > I certainly wouldn't want to accept a message in this case, user
> > might be 1K under quota, but get 20m file now that might be a
> > whoopie doo :) but what if 130K users did same.
>
> Well, I'd argue that if you're allowing mess
as a ton of management
> tools
> and instrumentation interfaces, and has a proven enterprise track record.
Agree wth XFS, providing, and a big providing, you have reliable and
guaranteed power, hard powerouts on XFS are not known for their niceness
and protection of data
--
Kind Regar
Bugger, hit enter too soon, was going to say, it is probably better than
using EXT4 though, why on earth anyone would use that on a serious
production server I'll never know.
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 11:51 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 17:51 -0600, Stan Hoeppn
On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 03:54 +0200, Marcin Czupryniak wrote:
> I'm trying to configure SSHA512 passwords and when testing discovered
> that they were not working as expected.
> At first i was using Centos 6.4 which doesn't have the glibc CRYPT
> newest functions ($6$salt$pass) so had to rollback
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 21:43 -0700, Kris Magnusson wrote:
> Hi folks. I have set up a Ubuntu 12.04 VM with Dovecot, Postfix, MySQL,
> amavisd, and ISPConfig 3.
> tatic IP. I followed the instructions at howtoforge.com to set up and
> configure this
Somebody else recently used some howto f
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 23:38 -0700, Kris Magnusson wrote:
>
> and introducing a DB into the mix just made things an order of magnitude more
> complicated. I'd rather use OpenLDAP, since I can write JNDI code to figure
> out what's going on with a directory and even add/modify/delete entries to/
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 23:38 -0700, Kris Magnusson wrote:
> I will blow this VM away and start from scratch. Unless anyone has any
> concrete suggestions I can implement before then that I can use to salvage a
> day's worth of work.
>
If it comes down to it, I just asked on IRC for you if any
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 01:56 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 19.4.2013, at 1.53, Nick Edwards wrote:
>
> > So what is the point of the global?
> > I commented out the address in inet_listener, assuming it then will
> > use global, but no, cant connect at all then.
>
> If you comment out the add
speaking of failover, recall about two years ago when I and (IIRC two
others, forget who, dont have copy of messages anymore)
asked about mysql failover (where it only talked to the second host when
the first failed to respond - like postfix does) you mentioned it would
go on your "to do list" for
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 12:40 -0700, Professa Dementia wrote:
>
> Google has already admitted that they do not delete email, even when
Google does many may many non compliant things.
> those emails are deleted from the Trash. Google states that emails may
> be archived for a minimum of 2 mo
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 00:06 +0200, Simon Brereton wrote:
>
> The EU laws not withstanding, I think this is a good thing. The world
> didn't revolve around the EU anymore than it does the US.
Actually you may be wrong there, Australia and IIRC New Zealand, seem to
follow suite with the EU. and
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 07:35 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> du solltest nur Dovecot 2.2.1 verwenden
> der quota code in 2.1 ist "nicht voellig vollstaendig"
> das setup sieht auf den ersten Blick ok aus
>
The quota-grace I think was only bit not backported, is that right?
Did Timo do or anno
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 10:19 +0200, Forum wrote:
>
> But what is the meaning of the addional "*," now?
> Listening specially to IPV4 and IPV6?
>
* has always meant ipv4
:: has always meant ipv6
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 05:29 -0700, Professa Dementia wrote:
> On 5/3/2013 7:38 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> >
> > Incidentally, the last time I read the pop3 RFC, admittedly some decade
> > or so ago (and yeah it's likely been updated since?) I can not recall
>
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 02:31 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Reindl Harald skrev den 2013-05-06 02:11:
>
> > and who forces you jumping to 2.2 right now?
>
> missing good examples on maillist that it works
>
> > there is also 2.0 and 2.1
>
2.0 = abysmal
2.1 as of around 2.1.12-ish I deemed dove
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 10:56 +1000, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
> On 6/05/2013 10:46 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
> > The problem with dovecot is, Timo does not release rc's or beta's where
> > this testing could show the bugs found and ironed out for a _real_
> > release this
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 12:20 +1000, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
> Examples:
>
> http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-January/140156.html
> http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-January/062944.html
> http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-August/051544.html
>
I 've kept messages from this l
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 11:00 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> > I 've kept messages from this list since its last clean-out, in 08,
> > those message do not appear, it seems on jan 13, dovecots mail server
> > had no PTR entry, seems 11 messages in total missing - not my problem
>
> stop this b
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 08:22 -0400, Dave Gattis wrote:
> Maybe you should ask for a refund, or assist with the next version.
> You do program, right?
I am involved in several projects already, Timo wouldn't accept anything
from me anyway :)
<>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally si
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 15:39 +0200, Axel Luttgens wrote:
> Hmmm...
> Let's consider the RFC's part related to, for example, the TOP command:
>
> If the POP3 server issues a positive response, then the
> response given is multi-line. After the initial +OK, the
> POP3 server sen
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 11:45 -0700, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
>
> While I see the point you're trying to make, I don't think it is valid.
> On our servers the deleted message could exist in filesystem snapshots,
> disk->disk backups and on tape.
That's what most people forget - until they ac
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 20:24 +0200, Tobi wrote:
> Hello list
>
> today I built dovecot 2.2.1 from sources. But I have permission problems
> with LDA
> The "normal" imap part works fine, users can login and see their boxes.
> deliver is called as LDA from postfix master.cf as follows
> <<
> doveco
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 09:25 +0200, Axel Luttgens wrote:
> Reading RFCs is kind of an art.
>
That we certainly agree on :)
> Let's have a look at RFC 2119:
>
> Authors who follow these guidelines should incorporate this phrase
> near the beginning of their document:
>
>
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 20:57 +0100, Ben Morrow wrote:
>
> More importantly, it only works with clients (browsers) which are new
> enough to send SNI. If you use, for instance, any version of IE on
> Windows XP, it will not work.
>
Even old linux clients since 2006 (oldest copies of galeon and
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 12:49 -0400, Jim McNamara wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> I have dovecot version 1.2.8 installed from source. This morning I
> installed the sieve plugin to sort emails, and though the install
> reported no errors, the plugin doesn't seem to function, and no mention
> of it
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 10:47 -0400, Jim McNamara wrote:
> Thank you for the solid suggestion, Noel! I now have Dovecot 2.2.1 along
> with Pigeonhole 0.4.0. All is working well at present. The largest
> issues I encountered was getting the configuration changed and
> functional from my previous
On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 10:24 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 24.05.2013 09:52, schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
> > But mysql not problemo, it be Dovecot talk to both, do not want Dovecot to
> > talk to both at same time unless slave (local) copy die
>
> and this mostly for a good resason to support your
But each additional link added to the chain, is one more point of
failure, unless he's replied to OP privately I'm amazed Timo has ignored
this, since its been brought up from time to time before, if he no
longer plans on doing it, he should just say so, so people can look at
complete alternatives
gured to do it just as
> well (whereas LB couldn't do actual load balancing for multiple sql servers,
> because Dovecot uses long running TCP connections).
>
> On 29.5.2013, at 2.09, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> > But each additional link added to the chain, is one more poi
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 20:24 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> > Well, I'd add that the config itself should complain (with a link to the
> > wiki page explaining the issue) if more than one server is added. In
> > other words, it should tell the admin that it will not work as they may
> > be expec
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 07:01 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2013-05-30 2:59 AM, Nick Edwards wrote:
> > nobody makes us dovecot true, but dovecot works fine and in perfect
> > harmony with postfix, except this one option. I remember the earlier
> > thread and have been waiting for this option
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 15:10 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Hi Harald, if you declare this broken, why not fix it yourself, instead
> of barking to the moon, however the current behave should be written in
> the wiki, to avoid recover the same questions on the list in periods
>
Question Rober
Actually, it is an exploit against dovecot LDA, introduced, and caused
by, exim.
On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 09:58 +0200, Luigi Rosa wrote:
> One of our readers wrote in to let us know that he had received an attempted
> Exim/Dovecot exploit attempt against his email server. The exploit partially
/me lowers myself to harrys level coz he might understand it
only harry needs to read my reply, no one else should as your ears may
burn :)
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 04:12 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 22.06.2013 03:02, schrieb Nick Edwards:
> > Save your breath, Harald is just a complete abra
On Sun, 2013-07-14 at 21:38 -0700, Professa Dementia wrote:
> On 7/14/2013 9:03 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> > Guessing between the lines I made a few substitutions to localize it for
> > me, but when I run the line to dump the configs, the output is very short
> > because I do not have the *.
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 17:58 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> ssl_key_file = /etc/ssl/certs/mail.key
Hrmm the forced html -to- text conversion of this list (I sometimes
wonder if this is 1993 not 2013) seems to have stripped out the less
than bracket preceding the filename, but the actual en
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 02:20 +0100, Adnane wrote:
> Jul 23 03:01:34 mailer postfix/anvil[9245]: statistics: max connection
> rate 1/60s for (smtp:209.85.220.177) at Jul 23 02:58:13
> Jul 23 03:01:34 mailer postfix/anvil[9245]: statistics: max connection
> count 1 for (smtp:209.85.220.177) at Ju
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 18:30 -0700, Joseph Tam wrote:
> Adnane writes:
>
> > but I cant send mails
> >
> > Jul 23 03:01:34 mailer postfix/anvil[9245]: statistics: max connection
> > rate 1/60s for (smtp:209.85.220.177) at Jul 23 02:58:13
> > Jul 23 03:01:34 mailer postfix/anvil[9245]: statistics:
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 09:30 +0200, Jan Behrend wrote:
> You cannot use the LDA method if SMTP and IMAP services reside on
> different machines, which would be the case in larger scale mail system
> setups.
>
Sorry, that is incorrect.
Granted, it does mean putting dovecot on the SMTP servers
0.9.7?
that was released in 2001 IIRC, and ceased being supported in 2005,
that's 8 years ago, are you really suggesting dovecot be patched to
process something that's so old, you likely have far more problems, of a
security nature that is.
On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 07:45 +0200, Andreas Schulze wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 15:46 -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> > on most widely used distributions you even have no openssl
> > version supporting TLS 1.2 and so you lock them all out
>
> OpenSSL 1.0.1 supports TLS 1.2. So does Windows 7/8 and MacOS X.
> Mozilla NSS 3.15 does 1.2.
>
> FWIW, I was a
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 15:05 -0400, Bruce Markey wrote:
> I think it's something more. Apparently it's not even looking at the
> database. Not sure what I didn't do.
> If anyone can point me to a good dovecot / mysql quota how to that would
> be helpful.
>
> Thank you
> bruce
>
>
signatur
Hi Patrick,
On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 09:23 +0200, Patrick Lists wrote:
> Hi Noel,
>
> On 09/12/2013 08:54 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
> [snip]
> > I'm always of the belief that if one person wants a feature, they might
> > be the only vocal person, but they are nev
On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 10:18 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> Perhaps I am doing the chain incorrectly. I just tried again. The
> server is now set up with the following:
>
> I have three certs in this chain file:
>
> cat imaps.unixathome.org.pem sub.class1.server.ca.pem ca.pem >
> testing.chain
On Sat, 2013-09-14 at 15:21 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> >
>
> Hmmm, I tried ssl = yes. Mail.app still crashes when trying to connect.
>
Well, its likely an Apple fault, after all their implementation of pop3
has been known to be broken for many many many years, but still after
all these yea
On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 10:10 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Sep 14, 2013, at 10:36 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2013-09-14 at 15:21 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hmmm, I tried ssl = yes. Mail.app still cr
On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 08:39 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > Since we just ruled this one out, might I suggest you grab the source
> > and build it, install it all under /opt/dovecot that way it wont
> > interfere with your ports installation and try that, the one you
> > successfully just tested
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 00:50 -0400, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> So in 1.2.9 I had something like this:
>
> [...]
>
> socket listen {
> master {
> path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-master
> mode = 0600
> user = virtual # User running Dovecot LDA's d
Dovecot should never generate a message to send to sender, this is
classified as backscatter.
Your MTA should get the quota answer from dovecot when the sender
connects, and tries to mail and fail then, it is the MTA (maillog file)
you need to look at to see why your MTA is not tempfailing the
conn
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 04:21 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> NSA doesn't sniff the wire. They don't crack encryption. Neither are
somebody hasnt been paying attention
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 14:04 +0200, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
> [OT] Why, they actually use the english TEMPORA to get the data, so at
> least in part they don't sniff the wire...
>
Tempora, amongst others
(remember tempora is pretty old now)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digital
On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 07:29 +1000, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote:
>
> I have working dovecot 2.1.1 with postfix, only have virtual domains, all
> users in mysql;
>
> '+' delimiter is enabled in postfix, and, works OK
>
> postfix]# grep _delimiter main.cf
> # The recipient_delimiter parameter specifi
On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 17:24 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On 26 Sep 2013, at 15:29 , voy...@sbt.net.au wrote:
> > should I also enter $recipient_delimiter = ‘+’ in my
> > /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf ?
> >
> > what will it add to this working setup, what am I missing?
>
> Setting it will, as I understan
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 15:47 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
> For dovecot 2.1
>
> as per wiki2, is this still valid? noticed a problem before and saw
> it does seem to be triggering, I use:
>
looks out dated
> filter.d/dovecot.conf
That'll never work, you need to change
> [Definition]
> failrege
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 21:55 +0200, Gordon Grubert wrote:
> >
>
> this is no problem of dovecot. Nevertheless, for analysis, you can use
> fail2ban-regex when applying your filter to your logfile.
>
Kind of right, but the dovevcot wiki apparently contains wrong
information, so I think its fai
On 06/10/2013 03:16, Dean Guenther wrote:
mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/spool/mail/%u
mail_privileged_group = mail
mbox_write_locks = fcntl
mbox over NFS has *never* been recommended, it is unsafe - for any
pop/imap type server, not just dovecot. If its not too late, and since
yo
301 - 400 of 457 matches
Mail list logo
