+1
Strongly agree with this. If you have enough users that you have
use both hands to count them, running different protocols on
different ports is a sure-fire way to annoy your users and create
problems for support staff (eg. you). Either allow the antique
protocol everywhere, or give notice and cut it off.
-- Noel Jones
ccess. These same things can mess up
dovecot access too.
Unmount the drive and fsck it a few times. Power cycle / reboot the
system.
-- Noel Jones
On 11/16/2018 10:05 AM, StarionTech (IMAP) wrote:
> Yes, I thought all of those things too. Spent a good part of yesterday
> eliminating
I expect the delivery location used by the Dovecot LDA is set in the
Dovecot LDA and not in postfix.
-- Noel Jones
On 1/17/2021 8:42 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
I tried the obvious:
mail_location = maildir:/var/mail/vhosts/%d/%n/mail:INBOX=mail/.Incoming
and that failed in an even more
pient mail.
The only solution is to reject all mail for an over-quota recipient
during recipient restrictions, and if the mail passes that stage,
deliver it anyway even if it makes the user go over quota.
-- Noel Jones
ss-of-size.
MTA- I have a 0 byte mail for bob. Is he over quota?
D- nope, he's good for another 50Kb.
MTA- Ok, here's the mail, it's really 3Mb.
D- Thanks, delivered.
-- next run --
MTA- I have a 0 byte mail for bob. Is he over quota?
D- Yes.
MTA- Thanks, rejected.
-- Noel Jones
No translation, but more like an alias.
>
> MJ
Don't use wildcard aliases. They break recipient validation and
cause postfix to accept all addresses.
Instead use 1-1 aliases, such as
user1@olddomaon user1@newdomain
user2@olddomaon user2@newdomain
user3@olddomaon user3@newdomain
...
-- Noel Jones
On 8/23/2017 2:53 PM, mj wrote:
>
> On 08/23/2017 06:03 PM, Noel wrote:
>> Don't use wildcard aliases. They break recipient validation and
>> cause postfix to accept all addresses.
>>
>> Instead use 1-1 aliases, such as
>> user1@olddomaon user1@newd
On 10/22/2017 3:26 PM, Alef Veld wrote:
> Hi all.
> I’m a bit worried about the following read errors i see in my log lately.
> Mails still arrive and get sent fine, but what is going on with this? It
> doesn’t look good. Nothing has change on server side and i restarted all
> services (dovecot,
you likely
broke compatibility with older clients. If you need further help,
feel free to ask on the postfix-users list. Be sure to include
"postconf -nf" and "postconf -Mf" output, along with related log
entries demonstrating the problem.
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.h
Yes, dovecot handles the authentication, but the connection is
handled by postfix. We already know the authentication work since
you can receive mail, so the problem is either postfix or the client.
At any rate, this isn't a dovecot problem.
-- Noel Jones
On 6/2/2015 12:38 A
On 6/16/2015 10:44 AM, Steve Matzura wrote:
> The next phase of my testing procedure involves the simple act of
> delivering mail to my test box. When I send a message to either a
> valid or relayed user at my remote machine's address, it never gets
> there. I know this virtually for sure because I
amavis.
You can (temporarily) disable the content filter and get mail
flowing by commenting out any "content_filter" statements in postfix
main.cf or master.cf, then requeue all deferred mail with "postsuper
-r ALL"
Further discussion of this should move to the amavis-users list.
https://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/
-- Noel Jones
eader.
> And if somebody sends a mail to "u...@foo2.com", only the hostname
> "mail.foo2.com" should be visible in the mail header.
>
>
> Is there a way to do this?
>
>
The solution is to use multiple postfix instances rather than adding
lines to master.cf.
http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html
-- Noel Jones
On 12/18/2015 12:19 AM, Thilo Engelbracht wrote:
> Am 17.12.2015 um 16:16 schrieb Noel :
>
>> On 12/17/2015 11:51 AM, Thilo Engelbracht wrote:
>>> But my customer asks me if it's possible that only his domain is visible
>>> in the header:
>>> So, if so
s/smtpd warning hash:/etc/postfix/virtual is
> unavailable open database /etc/postfix/virtual.db No such file.
This is (likely) the virtual_alias_maps rewrite map, definitely not
the virtual delivery process.
Find where you've defined a virtual map with
# postconf | grep virtual
and remove
On 1/17/2016 4:53 PM, Brad wrote:
> Hi Christian, Noel and Skeeved,
>
> Found the offending postfix -o virtual map in master.cf and
> removed it.
>
> Re-tested email and new error but the warning for the virtual is
> gone:
>
> Sender address rejected not owned by user
&
services, which is good.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Tom
The confusion is caused by the way some client software
differentiate these services in their configuration, often referring
to wrappermode smtps/imaps as "SSL", and STARTTLS as "TLS".
-- Noel Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIG
ort = 1234
> }
> }
>
> Anyone have ideas if this could be improved, or used for some
> other purposes?
Cool.
Does this just check for valid user existence, or can it also check
for over-quota (and respond 500 overquota I suppose)?
-- Noel Jones
On 1/9/2012 9:37 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 09.01.2012 16:32, schrieb Noel:
>> On 1/9/2012 8:43 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/f562bcaca215 implements
>>> "postmap" type sockets, which follow Postfix's
On 1/9/2012 12:09 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 9.1.2012, at 17.32, Noel wrote:
>
> Cool.
> Does this just check for valid user existence, or can it also check
> for over-quota (and respond 500 overquota I suppose)?
> Hmm. That looked potentially useful, but Postfix doesn&#x
the mail for you and forwards
connections to some different port on your computer. I don't know
of any free services that do this; dyndns and others offer this for
a fee, sometimes combined with spam/virus filtering.
-- Noel Jones
On 1/24/2012 5:23 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2012-01-23 11:14 AM, Noel wrote:
>> If your problem is that your Internet Service Provider is blocking
>> port 25, you can contact them. Some ISPs will unblock port 25 on
>> request, or might even have an online form you can
rds"
warnings.
!
Seriously ?
Definitely you should run ntpd -- but you need to make sure
that it's configured correctly and working. Running "ntpdate"
will cause time to jump.
-- Noel Jones
. Exceptions
are virtual machines, which have their own time tools, and
"personal" devices that sleep/resume frequently, AFAIK no
reliable solution for these.
-- Noel Jones
Virtual environments have their own time service.
-- Noel Jones
ight since you'll
reject a significant amount of non-spam mail.
Another thing to consider setting in postfix main.cf is:
smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender = yes
which will reject invalid envelope senders in your domain. (Note
the difference between envelope sender and the From: header.)
-- Noel Jones
ist. That is a serious problem.
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
The point you're missing is that there is no way to validate the
From: header. Look at other features of the unwanted mail for ways
to reject it.
-- Noel Jones
e and STARTTLS,
and they aren't compatible. The SSL/TLS designation, while not
technically correct, is a convenient way to tell users which to pick
without a long on-screen description.
Anyone who's confused by this is trying too hard. It's really all TLS.
-- Noel Jones
t; account settings menu?
>
> Does anyone have any experience with configuring Outlook to use
> self-signed certs?
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
This sounds like you're working on a fairly big project, so spend
$20 and 15 minutes to get a REAL certificate for the test domain
from one of the countless online vendors.
Surely your time is worth something --- you've spent two days
futzing around with this already, and aren't done yet.
-- Noel Jones
an $20/year, takes literally 15 minutes from start to having
a certificate. Well, maybe 30 minutes the first time when you need
to read everything.
There are probably dozens of other sites offering similar services;
I've used this one several times.
-- Noel Jones
ions = permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_unauth_destination
but what we really want to see (and what postfix-users will want to
see) is how you integrated this into postfix, not a working config
before changes. Did you maybe forget the "check_policy_service"
keyword?
-- Noel Jones
retty easy to
define a different action, such as the old fashioned but still
effective null route the offending IP, or if you build dovecot with
tcp wrapper support, Fail2Ban can add the IP to hosts.deny.
Of course, you can block with null routes or hosts.deny manually,
but better to let the computer do the work.
-- Noel Jones
wiki2.dovecot.org/SSL
>
> Quoting from the latter page:
>
> "Some admins want to require SSL/TLS, but don't realize that this is
> also possible with STARTTLS (Dovecot has disable_plaintext_auth=yes
> and ssl=required settings)."
It's not unreasonable to disable the plaintext ports to minimize the
possibility of a fat-fingered accident.
-- Noel Jones
ettings in thunderbird, possibly the
server->authentication method setting.
-- Noel Jones
> Stan?
>
The objective of Stan's list is to reject dynamic hosts, because the
overwhelming majority of dynamic hosts trying to send via SMTP are
zombies.
For dovecot, the situation is quite different. Blocking all dynamic
IPs would be an obvious mistake.
-- Noel Jones
failures during Y seconds,
fail all future attempts for the account for T seconds. Maybe reset
the timer on each attempt during the blackout period so the timer
never expires on the persistent distributed brute force attacks. I
suppose there would also need to be a way to whitelist IPs so the
account owner can get in.
-- Noel Jones
ecret is the "pfctl -k IP" command to drop state for the
offending IP. Just add it to your fail2ban action command.
action = /sbin/pfctl {whatever you have now} && /sbin/pfctl -k
A nice writeup of fail2ban and pf can be found here:
http://www.effu.se/2011/03/Integrating-PF-with-Fail2ban-0.9
-- Noel Jones
On 9/3/2013 5:12 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
> Ummm... maybe you didn't read what I wrote? That is what I meant
> by 'whitelist' in item 1... ;)
>
Yes, I think we're on the same page.
>
> On 2013-09-02 9:59 PM, ot...@ahhyes.net wrote:
>> Is there anyway to limit the number of auth attempts allow
users.
> Operators of shared hosting servers certainly wont have that luxury.
On my personal sever I use http://www.ipdeny.com/ cidr blocks to
only allow the countries where users are expected to be. Obviously
not a solution for an ISP...
-- Noel Jones
ds.
Remember the purpose of greylisting is to reject bots, not delay
"real" mail servers -- even if you don't want their mail.
-- Noel Jones
software you're
familiar with.
You're welcome to discuss postfix header checks further on the
postfix-users list.
-- Noel Jones
it was before.
mail_location Optionally disable indexes using :INDEX=MEMORY
don't use this on IMAP boxes, but is safe to use on SMTP and POP3's
boxes though
eg:
mail_location =
maildir:/var/vmail/%Ld/%1Ln/%1.1Ln/%2.1Ln/%Ln/Maildir:INDEX=MEMORY
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
e RPMs, RH
v say for example Fresh, because package maintainers will package
differently.
Its like trying to stick a cisco 1800 image on an ASR9K and expecting it
to work perfectly.
Though we don't use deb or rpm based systems and haven't for about 15
years, if I was to, I think I'd
/plugins/managsieve/config.inc.php.dist to config.inc.php,
and enable the plugin in /config/config.inc.php in $config[plugins]
arrayjust like every other plugin.
done...
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privi
but it shows
it takes very little work to "document" it, your stressing for no
reason.
https://mail.ausics.net/help/add_filter0.gif
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information, therefore remains
use either and all your pain will go
away
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information, therefore remains confidential and subject to copyright
protected under international law. You may not disseminate, dis
outs set. Not waiting for infinity.
>
> This is on 2.3.3. 2.2 worked fine without needing time unit specified.
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information, therefore remains confidential and subject to
me that some people on mailing lists feel the
need to reply directly, rather than through mailing list.
(Yeah I know its also shortcomings of certain mailers and mailing
services (has gmail even fixed that yet) where hitting reply or reply
all should go to list. Its also dumb when list admins dont
On 02/12/2018 10:16, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> On 12/01/2018 04:09 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
>
>> Which is why it annoys me that some people on mailing lists feel the need to
>> reply directly, rather than through mailing list.
>
> Sometimes it is the MUA that is poorly d
tting
1500 people ask the same damn question.
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information, therefore remains confidential and subject to copyright
protected under international law. You may not disseminate, di
n username via dovecot.
I think Aki's playing with settings that are not quite right yet :)
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information, therefore remains confidential and subject to copyr
one here has to do shit for you, the
fact it works for everyone else, indicates there is a problem with your
configuration and yours alone - somewhere, and because you're the only
one experiencing this, it may be harder to trace the origin of.
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
On 07/12/2018 16:44, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> On 6.12.2018 6.54, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> On 06/12/2018 07:29, Jakobus Schürz wrote:
>
> that all and every Flag is set, except \Seen... I tried to figure out, whats
> happening here...
>
> Paste what your sieve file contain
On 07/12/2018 17:55, Jakobus Schürz wrote:
> Am 07.12.18 um 08:10 schrieb Noel Butler:
>
> On 07/12/2018 16:44, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> On 6.12.2018 6.54, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> On 06/12/2018 07:29, Jakobus Schürz wrote:
>
> that all and every Flag is set, except
is is probably more a question for postfix users list, might explain
why noone here answered you, but no its not needed with lmtp, and 2 msgs
a second, you want see any benefit over lda unless your running on a 386
:)
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain le
23:02, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-06-12 13:42, Noel Butler wrote:
off your drugs again benny?
WTF should she provide all the config outputs, when she asked a simple
question about one option, and WTF clamav came from is beyond me
this is very important AFTER i replayed to help, not BEFORE,
since logs indicate
this only occurred after updating to the point 1 release.
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may
ing else at once in a
new major is perfectly acceptable, and, is the norm.
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information, therefore remains confidential and subject to copyright
protected under international law. You
On 01/10/2016 08:27, Joseph Tam wrote:
we have a setup with (CentOS 6) Director+Dovecot, Maildir as storage
on
NetApp NFS v3. Every time I try to switch to NFS v4 I found issue with
lock (and others). So for me NFSv4 with Maildir is "unstable" or need
a
fine tuning that I don't know.
I foun
> [1]: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-8562
> [2]: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-856
> 2
Ups, sent wrong number, correct is CVE-2016-8652.
That is the same number, no?
No, read it again. the wrong and pasted copie are 8 5 62, his revise
s.
Just like passwd backends which we used to be able to select, now, sadly
dovecot is bloatware
I can compile an entire freaking kernel 35% faster than dovecot :)
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information
racle, MariaDB Corporation Ab and others.
Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the current input
statement.
MariaDB [(none)]>
If not, look into mysql db and verifiy vmail user and perms (especially
for localhost), ensure yo
hit enter too quickly (I've had one coffee all morning hehe)
On 15/08/2017 08:54, Noel Butler wrote:
> Copyright (c) 2000, 2017, Oracle, MariaDB Corporation Ab and others.
>
> Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the current input
&
he wrong
area, since the database stores passwords hashed, you enter it in, in
plain text, the database them does its magic to convert what you entered
in, into a hash and does the matching in its own backend, so to speak.
if you put in your dovecot sql file, the vmail password in plain text
and not
On 15/08/2017 22:23, Noel Butler wrote:
> On 15/08/2017 21:25, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote:
>
>> On Tue, August 15, 2017 8:03 pm, Sami Ketola wrote:
>> On 15 Aug 2017, at 2.50, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote:
>>
>> how do I generate hashed string from my password ?
>>
On 15/08/2017 22:58, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote:
> On Tue, August 15, 2017 10:27 pm, Noel Butler wrote:
>
>> HUH?
>> Are you trying to login to mysql using the hash itself?
>
> Noel, thanks!!
>
> oops, misunderstood instruction...
>
> this is better:
>
delete anything - til you get it sorted)
> mailbox Drafts {
> special_use = \Drafts
> }
> mailbox Junk {
> special_use = \Junk
> }
> mailbox Sent {
> special_use = \Sent
> }
> mailbox "Sent Messages" {
> special_use = \Sent
> }
> mailbox Trash {
> special
insurance level on even the
most basic of their offerings. Do your research, though if using a paid
service, since some others are soon to be un-trusted.
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information, therefore
l/ closes the connection.
Thats not how maildir works you need to add the Maildir directory to it,
ie maildir:/var/spool/mail/%n/Maildir
but DO NOT USE THAT directory! And its more than dovecot you need to
change if you're going to use maildir, so just fix up your mbox
settings.
--
Kind Reg
Ahh thats it :)
He should be good now, no idea why a fedora install wouldn't have that
On 18/08/2017 19:43, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> mail_location=~/.mail:INBOX=/var/spool/mail/%Ln
>
> Aki
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may c
replied, I dare say Aki's post helped him sort it out.
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information, therefore remains confidential and subject to copyright
protected under international law. You may not
stems crypt options including sha's -
providing your system is half modern, if its ten years old dont use
that, it'll be likely using the old 8 char limited crypt :) (and dont
laugh the number of antique debian and RH boxes I've come across is
scary)
anyway, so even as a fallback for t
eparate db for support teams
anyway, or I'd hope so/
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate
thi
e actually smart and
exponentially more reliable and robust than server based :)
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may n
lue 0
On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 7:34 AM Noel Butler
wrote:
NFSv4, a dozen front ends to an EMC backend, with v4 we added "noac
lookupcache=none" in very early days - not sure if they are still
needed.
otherwise just like when using NFSv3, no problems, and never used
director.
On 22/05/2023 22:33, Marc wrote:
used director. real (hardware) load balancers are actually smart and
exponentially more reliable and robust than server based :)
because there runs no software on it, right
this statement here, shows what a clueless newbie you are
--
Regards,
Noel
- not blogs
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate
this message without the authors express wr
On 09/01/2016 22:06, mj wrote:
Compiling our own dovecot for production use sounds less appealing,
What's so un-appealing about building from source? It's then perfectly
matched to your system.
Admittedly I can build kernels faster than latest dovecot's, but that's
just the "make time"
On 22/02/2016 17:14, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 21.02.2016 19:10, Steve Litt wrote:
On Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:03:15 +0100
Thomas Leuxner wrote:
[snip]
https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/53cc71cae88ee81fd7eae47aed743496f8c884a2
[snip]
The PID-File seems to be expected under yet another sub-dir
o
On 02/03/2016 05:11, J. Niklas wrote:
On 01.03.2016 18:21, Dolf Schimmel wrote:
Recently I played around a little with cgroups where you can limit the
max number of processes per cgroup.
Could it be that, perhaps, you've stumbled upon such a limit?
Systemd does contain all services by default
On 06/03/2016 04:18, Robert Schetterer wrote:
for paranoid people, create you own repo
and for info dovecot had nice compiled from scratch to me in the past
too
The only way to use dovecot IMHO is by source, you build in what you
want and omit the junk (that some repo packagers want to incl
On 13/03/2016 20:47, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +
James wrote:
On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> zfs set sync=disabled ?
Only if you are happy to loose data on power failure.
I don't know the actual setup, but if you have no UPC you
On 14/03/2016 09:59, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:32:42 +1000
Noel Butler wrote:
On 13/03/2016 20:47, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +
> James wrote:
>
>> On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>&g
On 14/03/2016 18:49, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
and you've never seen these cause problems with FS? then you must be
a
newbie, in over 25 years I've seen it happen several times - yes even
after an apparent controlled shutdown.
Maybe you're doing something wrong then. because in my la
It seems its troll time again on this list, ohh maybe its Harry in
disguise... So I will play along, for today anyway :)
On 19/03/2016 18:11, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:37:04 +1000
Noel Butler wrote:
On 14/03/2016 18:49, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>
>&g
On 21/03/2016 17:06, Andre Rodier wrote:
Hello,
Sorry if I am off topic a little.
I am looking for an email host provider that supports dovecot, sieve
and manage sieve. Ideally with the roundcube webmail and managesieve
plugin
Better if it is in Europe or switzerland. I don't mind paying a lit
On 26/03/2016 17:04, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:34:34 +1000
Noel Butler wrote:
On 21/03/2016 17:06, Andre Rodier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry if I am off topic a little.
>
> I am looking for an email host provider that supports dovecot, sieve
>
On 28/03/2016 01:09, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
I love this on your about page:
On 27/03/2016 3:14 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
I don't need to understand German law, thats what my Frankfurt lawyers
do, I'd trust our data privacy far more in our Frankfurt site, then I
would ever trust US or
On 31/03/2016 02:06, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Hi,
Op 3/30/2016 om 5:34 PM schreef Juan C. Blanco:
Hello, I supose that a new version of pigeonhole is on the way because
version 0.4.13 does not compile against dovecot 2.2.23
This is the error that I get
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I..
On 31/03/2016 11:09, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Pigeonhole needs to be recompiled.
Regards,
Stephan.
hrmm it was, but process was ampersands so maybe somthing prior failed
and it did not complete make install, its late so ill look at it again
tomorrow.
--
If you have the urge to reply to a
On 26/06/2016 02:39, Michael Fox wrote:
The most crucial difference is that LDA is intended for delivering
email
to a *real* user.
Aki
Thanks Aki.
Pardon my ignorance, but why does it matter? In other words, what is
it that makes LDA better for a *real* user and LMTP better for a
virtual u
On 02/07/2016 19:16, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have a pigeon sive running which directs some of my received mail to
the Junk folder. That works just fine. However, a couple minutes
later, it is moved to Deleted mailbox and deleted from Junk. At first
I thought my client was doing that so I shut dow
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 16:12 +0100, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
> 30 Degrees Centigrade whilst 22 outside? Where the heck are you
> living ?
>
Indeed, at 22c I'm still wearing a jumper :) ... 30c is just right.
<>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 16:55 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 7/28/2011 2:51 AM, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
>
> > Now the problem concerns outgoing messages. If I try to send e-mail
> > through out command (local user) or through out authentication
> > provided by a virtual user I get a error like:
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 14:02 +0200, spamv...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Hi..
>
> are there any proofen Methods to backup all mail ?
>
> shutting down dovecot and tar the hole dir?
> using rsnapshot?
>
> any hints / thoughts
>
> im running dovecot2 on freebsd
>
I assume it's only a single stand
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 17:12 -0400, Postmaster wrote:
> I'm not able to access the mailing list archives following the
> instructions here...
>
>http://www.dovecot.org/mailinglists.html
>
> using either IMAP or by downloading the mbox file.
replace www.dovecot.org with dovecot.org
the mir
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 16:05 +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
> On 17/08/2011 16:00, Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
> > Is there any way to achieve this with dovecot? Does anybody have another
> > idea smoothly force used to switch to TLS?
>
> Hi,
>
> Maybe by sending them an email with a deadline for the
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 09:10 +0300, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> On 08/06/2011 01:32 AM, Ian Evans wrote:
> > I run a Dovecot 1.2.16 pop3 server and have just started using the
> > Thunderbird 5 email client.
> >
> > Thunderbird is set to leave the messages on the server unless they are
> > over 91 d
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 19:33 -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> default_pass_scheme = PLAIN
Uhg i'll pretend I didnt see that :)
>
> According to the sample SQL configuration file "HA / round-robin
> load-balancing is supported by giving multiple host settings, like:
> host=sql1.host.org host
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 20:16 -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:02:57PM -0700, Noel Butler wrote:
> > suggest, having just one master server, after all, dovecot and postfix
> > just need to read, not alter/update/insert etc.
>
> True; but the pie
1 - 100 of 517 matches
Mail list logo
