dont play net cop here
but since you want to try force your opinion down others throats heres
one for you, if you want to try dictate to someone to bottom post to
suite you how about you use proper net etiquette yourself and TRIM
your posts
On 12/19/18, admin wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2018
This is why sane admins don't use the *EVIL* systemd
Thankfully there are still some modern distros that refuse to touch it.
Name sounds cute, the idea sounded OK, but the reality is, its a
_REDACTED_ useless pile of REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Dudi Goldenberg
daemontools
On 3/2/15, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2015, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 02.03.2015 um 10:06 schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
>>> If such plugin(?) is available, I would expect immediate complains, it
>>> does not support:
>>>
>>> +
You can script fail2ban to send the entries to a rbldnsd file on a
remote server, I know someone who does it based on apache, since it
uses fail2ban, i shouldnt matter if its apache, or dovecot.
I thought Timo once said dovecot had tarpitting, its useless if it is
there, and if it is, it needs us
On 3/4/15, Earl Killian wrote:
> On 2015/3/2 10:03, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> that is all nice
>>
>> but the main benefit of RBL's is always ignored:
>>
>> * centralized
>> * no log parsing at all
>> * honeypot data are "delivered" to any host
>> * it's cheap
>> * it's easy to maintain
>> * it do
On 3/24/15, Adrian Zaugg wrote:
> I think everyone shares your concerns. But there are no rules that the
> outcome of this merger must get something bad, so let's see what
> happens. I hope that it's true what Timo said and that dovecot can
> evolve and get even better as it is today. Good luck gu
On 3/25/15, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 23 Mar 2015, at 19:41, Patrick Coffin wrote:
>>
>>
>> To Timo and the Dovecot guys - congratulations! I'm sure this merger with
>> OpenXchange is going to provide you with a lot of resources and
>> opportunities.
>>
>> As a longtime user of dovecot, I do hav
On 4/3/15, Jogi Hofmüller wrote:
>
>
> Am 2015-04-02 um 18:24 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>> Am 02.04.2015 um 18:19 schrieb Jogi Hofmüller:
>>> Am 2015-04-02 um 17:49 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
> On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 01.04.2015 u
On 4/2/15, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
> On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
>>> On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
> IMHO the larger the corporation is, the less are t
you wouldnt know, your not a developer, shit processor maybe, but not
a developer
On 4/3/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.04.2015 um 18:19 schrieb Jogi Hofmüller:
>> Am 2015-04-02 um 17:49 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>> Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
On 4/1/15, Reindl Hara
before reporting an issue, please try a version made this millenium,
2.2.9 is older than my gran
or take it up with your distro, dovecot doesnt make the distro version they do
On 12/18/15, Serge Spinoza wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have Dovecot + Postfix + MySQL.
> Version of Postix: postfix_2.11.3-1ubuntu
Why do you troll
You do not help OP in any way saying, use another distribution, this is a
clear sign of TROLL
Too many on this list, if you not going to help OP piss off and dont click
that reply button and ignore tham, how about we tell you to use another
distribution that is current like gentoo,
please do not feed the troll
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
>
> Ubuntu has a nice dovecot-postfix combo package.
>
>
Hiya,
Today I note there are 38 imap-logins that seem to be stale on our staff
imap server,
they do not seem to die off, new imap-logins are created with new logins
and exit accordingly.
Now, these are from our monitoring software that runs on another server on
our LAN. Our corporate link was t
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 16.11.2011, at 0.48, Nick Edwards wrote:
>
> > Today I note there are 38 imap-logins that seem to be stale on our staff
> > imap server,
> > they do not seem to die off, new imap-logins are created with
Trying to get dovecot to _only_ use local copy of database, only querying
another database server (same database, just replicated) if local copy is
not responding, I have google fu'd a bit and found my only answer in so far
as dovecot did this once upon as time, but it was only due to a dovecot
bug
wrote:
> Am 10.12.2011 11:07, schrieb Nick Edwards:
> > Trying to get dovecot to _only_ use local copy of database, only querying
> > another database server (same database, just replicated) if local copy is
> > not responding, I have google fu'd a bit and found my only an
Hello Timo,
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 10.12.2011, at 12.07, Nick Edwards wrote:
>
> > Trying to get dovecot to _only_ use local copy of database, only querying
> > another database server (same database, just replicated) if local copy is
>
It did not convert over some things:
protocol imap {
listen = *:143
mail_plugins = quota imap_quota
imap_client_workarounds = outlook-idle
ssl_listen = *:993
}
protocol pop3 {
pop3_uidl_format = %f
mail_plugins = quota
pop3_client_workarounds = ou
On 3/13/12, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 13.3.2012, at 9.27, Nick Edwards wrote:
>
>> It did not convert over some things:
> ..
>
> What Dovecot version did you use? In my test it converted everything
1.2.17 -> 2.1.1
>
> protocol pop3 {
> mail_plugins =
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Monika Janek wrote:
> Hi everyone! What's the best filesystem to use for the mail spool? I'm
> debating between Debian with xfs or FreeBSD with zfs. I'm not sure which
> way to go. I'm migrating from cyrus. I have about 50 users so it's not a
> large setup.
>
> Ch
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Nick Edwards put forth on 1/28/2011 9:47 PM:
>
> > xfs is not very nice to you if you lose power, it's not as bad as it used
> to
> > be, but it still gives you 0 byte files, so make sure you have a good UPS
> to
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Eric Diaz Fernandez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to setup a dovecot imap server.
>
> version is 2.0.9
> I've setup a mysql database using:
>
> user_query = \
>SELECT home, uid, gid, home as userdb_home, uid as userdb_uid, gid as
> userdb_gid, \
>FROM user
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Jerrale G <
jerralega...@sheltoncomputers.com> wrote:
>
>>
> For a more extensive mysql support, implementing ALL possible features of
> dovecot & postfix:
>
> connect = host=localhost user=maildb password= dbname=mail
>
Close, if you're suggesting "ALL"
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Nick Edwards put forth on 1/29/2011 7:14 PM:
> > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Stan Hoeppner >wrote:
> >
> >> Nick Edwards put forth on 1/28/2011 9:47 PM:
> >>
> >>> xfs is not very nice
Is there a known workaround for users who want to use the old recipient
delimiter plus sign method of sorting their mail? eg: foo.bat
+dove...@example.com
This does not work with postfix/dovecot, but if we tell
postfix/system-passwd to use the recipient_delimiter = + it works just like
I recall
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Jerry wrote:
> On Sat, 28 May 2011 17:53:38 +1000
> Nick Edwards articulated:
>
>
> >
> >
> > our postfix master.cf is
> > dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
> >flags=DRhu user=mail:ma
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Jerry wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2011 10:52:37 +1000
> Nick Edwards articulated:
>
> > (BTW I got this message in my spam folder it must not like the
> > dollar signs?)
>
> Interesting! I hope this does not end up in the Spam f
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Henrik Larsson wrote:
> which leads to postfix complaining:
>>
>> May 30 13:28:39 mail postfix/smtpd[25014]: NOQUEUE: reject_warning: RCPT
>> from unknown[193.210.130.67]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot
>> find your reverse hostname, [193.210.130.67];
>> f
Dear Timo,
Do you intend to introduce bcrypt into the built in password schemes?
In lew of all these hacks lately many larger companies appear moving
this way, we are looking at it too, but dovecot will then be the
weakest link in the database security.
So, are you planning on this and if so wha
bump
On 7/12/12, Nick Edwards wrote:
> Dear Timo,
>
> Do you intend to introduce bcrypt into the built in password schemes?
>
> In lew of all these hacks lately many larger companies appear moving
> this way, we are looking at it too, but dovecot will then be the
> weakest
Timo,
I have much suspicion that our quota system is not working correctly
since we migrate to 2.1
Currently using 2.1.10
Previously we had for issue of warnings
quota_warning = storage=90%% /scripts/dqwarn-90.sh
quota_warning2 = storage=75%% /scripts/dqwarn-75.sh
worked great, these lines als
Thanks
On 11/23/12, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 15.11.2012, at 6.55, Nick Edwards wrote:
>
>> Timo,
>>
>> I have much suspicion that our quota system is not working correctly
>> since we migrate to 2.1
>> Currently using 2.1.10
>> Previously we had
Hello Timo
We would like to reduce the logging by increasing severity, we don't
use syslog since we use
log_path = /var/log/dovecot/pop3.log
Is there a way auth-worker can be made to log warn|error instead of info?
Constantly 1/5th of the log file is filled with auth-work info
connecting to
As usual you post with nothing helpful to say, I wont dignify your
regular trolling by commenting any further
On 3/23/13, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 23.03.2013 02:31, schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> Hello Timo
>>
>> We would like to reduce the logging by increasing sever
ontains, "Connected to database dbmail" ~
>
> was not helpful?
> well, not if you insist in not use syslog
>
> maybe you should explain why not using syslog as
> everybody else to taken serious because "i do not
> want" in case where it is clear you need is no
charlie marcus) some for trolling, I seek a definitive answer and
there is only one man who can give this, but I likely was mailing a old
address he doesn't read
-- Forwarded message --
From: Nick Edwards
Date: Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 6:15 PM
Subject: NFS question
To: t...@i
Timo,
Is the global listen directive supposed to be a governing directive,
like in apache? or is it there just in case you dont use it in
protocols?
I set a specific ipv6 address in global listen, but use [::] in proto
Testing to a secondary IP, not in the global listen, it still
connects, so can
(
policy says cant use company email for public lists)
On 4/15/13, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 13.4.2013, at 7.13, Nick Edwards wrote:
>
>> Is the global listen directive supposed to be a governing directive,
>> like in apache? or is it there just in case you dont use it in
>>
addresses from
global if no address is provided in inet_listener statements
it seems at present to be two competing options.
On 4/19/13, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 18.4.2013, at 2.36, Nick Edwards wrote:
>
>> I do not get warnings, and,
>>
>> listen = *, ::1, 2001:470:some:s
+1
On 5/30/13, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
> As oringanal poster, I agree with previouz comment, I too feel thiz
> dovecot responsibile for thiz work handoff, or should delete ability to use
> two host, people twitter I ask all along thought this how it work too!
>
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:29 PM,
On 5/30/13, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 30.05.2013 03:41, schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
>> As oringanal poster, I agree with previouz comment, I too feel thiz
>> dovecot responsibile for thiz work handoff, or should delete ability to
>> use
>> two host, people twitter I ask all along thought this how
On 6/21/13, A.L.E.C wrote:
> On 06/21/2013 03:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 21.06.2013 06:30, schrieb izul:
>>> Im planning to migrate my mail server using imapsync.I need master user
>>> in
>>> my dovecot 1.1.20.Im so blind about this.Anybody can help me?
>>
>> why in the world is someo
For dovecot 2.1
as per wiki2, is this still valid? noticed a problem before and saw
it does seem to be triggering, I use:
maxretry = 6
findtime = 600
bantime = 3600
and there was like, 2400 hits in 4 minutes, it is pointing to the
correct log file, but I am no expert with fail2ban, so not sure
, so it requires what Noel suggested, a repeat without the end ,.*
as well, and our OS not using pam, so wouldnt need that
thanks anyway
On 10/5/13, Oscar del Rio wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 1:47 AM, Nick Edwards wrote:
>> filter.d/dovecot.conf
>> [Definition]
>> failregex = (?:
Bingo!
Thanks, working now
On 10/5/13, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 15:47 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
>> For dovecot 2.1
>>
>> as per wiki2, is this still valid? noticed a problem before and saw
>> it does seem to be triggering, I use:
>>
On 11/9/13, Michael Kliewe wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> I would also, like others, see you mainly working on Dovecot as an IMAP
> server. As far as I can see there are many things on the roadmap, and I
> hope many more will be added (for example a built-in health-checker for
> director backends).
>
> Onl
On 11/9/13, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 9.11.2013, at 5.11, Nick Edwards wrote:
>
>> On 11/9/13, Michael Kliewe wrote:
>>> Hi Timo,
>>>
>>> I would also, like others, see you mainly working on Dovecot as an IMAP
>>> server. As far as I can see ther
On 11/12/13, Reindl Harald wrote:
> tell that Noel which is blocking my messages and so did
> not read what i quoted from Benny's trolling but opens
> his mouth
>
> tell that Noel which is abusing his power by set complete
> IP-ranges on RBL lists he maintains because he does not
> like one person
On 11/12/13, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> My installation is only serving 1/10 of your size, but long time ago we
> migrated off mysql for userdatabase, and over to LDAP. The MySQL data
> source had issues (not dovecot related), and didn't seem like the right
> tool for the job.
A database is a
*yawn*
you just dont get it do you, you have brought EVERYTHING upon
yourself, no one else to blame, only YOU
because you make a couple of helpful posts does not give you the right
to continue to abuse everyone like you repeatedly do
and as for blacklist, I am the operations centre manager cant f
On 11/13/13, Reindl Harald wrote:
> well, than you can't be in a important operations centre because
> if so you would not be permitted to make such a stupid decision
> at your own for anybody else
>
you're very correct, we only have about 31 thousand shared web hosts,
705 thousand DSL customers
On 11/22/13, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Nick Edwards skrev den 2013-11-22 07:20:
>> Timo (since he is the only one that maters here),
>
> so it should have being private mail ?
>
No Timo made it clear all dovecot stuff must go by list
> that sayed i keep dovecot 1.x as t
I wonder if you have the balls to send to that him so he can see it,
he did say he unsubscribed
all to often I see heros like you, you're like the bitchy kid who
waits for someone to walk out the room then bitch about them.
On 11/23/13, Rick Romero wrote:
> Noel,
>
> I include you in the gang of
On 11/24/13, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
> On 23-11-2013 3:47, Noel Butler wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 10:14 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>
>>> * Thomas Leuxner :
>>> > * Ralf Hildebrandt 2013.11.22 09:44:
>>> >
>>> > > Which patch?
>>> >
>>> > http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-Novembe
On 11/24/13, Luuk wrote:
> On 23-11-2013 18:44, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
>> On 23-11-2013 3:47, Noel Butler wrote:
>>> These would be found if Timo reverted back to issuing RC's before any
>>> official release, to iron out the niggly off-putting bugs, like most
>
>
>> I second this and offer
On 11/24/13, Eugene wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In recent years I use dovecot installed from FreeBSD ports. Interestingly, I
>
> feel that they follow the dovecot releases rather well but with some lag,
> e.g. currently it is at 2.2.6. I don't know if that is 'by design' or caused
>
> by lack of manpower
Claus,
Robert's suggestion is good, we backup maildir, with 5.9TB in 2 hours
to SATA , we also run a backup of that backup, so we have two extra
copies (this is on top of NAS snapshots)
tape is just too slow for anything serious these days.
N ik
On 12/5/13, Claus wrote:
> Am 02.12.2013 20:37, s
On 12/14/13, Scott Galambos wrote:
> There needs to be a way at compile time or in the config to turn the
> whole thing off. The best I could come up with is:
>
> doveadm mount add '/custompath/*' ignore
> doveadm mount add '/custompath*' ignore
>
> I had to do both to get it to finally stop addi
what has this to do with dovecot, from someone who purports to be
anti-spam you do a good enough job, at spamming.
On 1/9/14, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Short bash script to run a program
>
> 30 20 15 12 10 6 5 4 3 2 executions per minute.
>
>
> http://wiki.junkemailfilter.com/index.php/How_to_run_a_L
It does, we use sha512 for long time
in sql conf use
default_pass_scheme = CRYPT
it uses the systen crypt then, (NO - this does NOT mean it uses the
ancient 8 char limited crypt) it will use whatever your underlying
operating system allows, and unless you are using something thats more
than 10 yea
On 1/23/14, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2014-01-22 2:37 PM, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
>> All duplicates have no "received from" headers. Seperate lmtp log shows
>> only one delivery.
>
> As when troubleshooting anything like this, FULL logs for an event
> exhibiting the problem is in order.
>
dou
huh? You are logging a bug for antique version, if you grab latest
source, build and install it, and problem remains with current
version, THEN it is a bug, most devs would ignore you for such
sillyness otherwise
On 2/20/14, Jon Thompson wrote:
> Since I'm obviously using version 2.2.5, which is
Hi Steve,
new server from last month - 87.106.245.223
has correct A/PTR records, not in any DNSBL I can test, so no idea why
your not getting anything.
On 3/6/14, Steve Campbell wrote:
> I checked my settings on the dovecot mailman page, and although my
> account was set to "disable" email, a
Whats all the :comparator stuff for? is it because of German-English
character translations? In other words do you really need it?
Because I can't see why 2 and 5 wont work otherwise (even though I
think 5 is pretty broad, matching on any received line)
As for 2, locally I use
if allof (header :c
On 5/24/14, Subscriptions wrote:
> Made the changes, so entries in 10-master.conf are now:
>
> --
> service auth {
> unix_listener auth-userdb {
> #mode = 0666
> #user =
> #group =
> }
>
this should have user/group that should match how postfix master.cf see's it
eg:
master.
Nothing. Reindel has always been an abusive troll
On 6/11/14, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
> op 10-06-14 17:12, Reindl Harald schreef:
>>
>>
>
>>
>> than you have crap software somewhere on your side
>
> What did I do to get such reply ?
>
> Koenraad
>
If DMARC (the new kid on the block), gets broken by simple things like
subject changes on lists, then DMARC is broken, I wont go into the
other 9 key reasons I consider it useless because as you said this is
not the list for it.
On 6/11/14, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> Professa,
>
> I suggest to
"has the words" listid:dovecot.dovecot.org(exactly as written)
seems to work well for long time
On 6/11/14, Chris Young wrote:
> Gmail doesn't let me filter on message headers so I've updated my filter as
> follows
>
> Before, my filter was
> SUBJECT:([Dovecot])
>
> But now my filter is
On 6/11/14, Jost Krieger wrote:
> On Wed Jun 11 12:03:24 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> Cisco routers by default mangle DNS traffic, break zone transfers
>> or even put befor all CNAME blocks a $TTL 0 line never appeared
>> on the master until you disable DNS ALG for UDP and TCP
>
> I believe tha
The dude you forced to leave the list last year tweeted about this
problem in February, so it was noticed back then, apparently Noel said
"CBF reporting the issue as the fucker would ignore me anyway, 'n if
he did read it, wld prolly blame my config"
I'll forward your patch and see what he says LO
I don't use fs, but,
service quota-warning {
executable = script /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning.sh
user = vmail
unix_listener quota-warning {
mode = 0666 <-
}
}
You also have
quota_warning2 = stora
it is the job of postfix to do this, aliases are just that, aliases of
the real mail account, they do not exist in real storage, else, they
would not be aliaes.
On 6/29/14, Alexandre Ellert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can someone tell me if it's possible to configure dovecot to answer quota
> information
On 6/29/14, Alexandre Ellert wrote:
> Le 29 juin 2014 à 06:24, Nick Edwards a écrit :
>
>> it is the job of postfix to do this, aliases are just that, aliases of
>
>> the real mail account, they do not exist in real storage, else, they
>> would not be alias.
>
>
On 6/30/14, Jiri Bourek wrote:
>
>
> On 30.6.2014 12:33, Nick Edwards wrote:
>> On 6/29/14, Alexandre Ellert wrote:
>>> Le 29 juin 2014 à 06:24, Nick Edwards a écrit
>>> :
>>>
>>>> it is the job of postfix to do this, aliases are just that,
protocol lda {
auth_socket_path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb
deliver_log_format = msgid=%m: from=%f: %$
log_path = /var/log/dovedel/deliver.log
mail_plugins = $mail_plugins sieve
postmaster_address = postmaster@YOUR_DOMAIN
quota_full_tempfail = no
}
On 7/2/14, Asai wrote:
>> Am 01.07.2014 21:02, schrieb Asai:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> I'm getting reports from a user who's reading and deleting mail on
>>> Thunderbird, but read flags and deletions don't show up in his Android
>>> phone. He's using the native Android mail app with the newest Andro
On 6/30/14, Francesco wrote:
>
> what am i doing wrong?
>
Using a NON SUPPORTED EOL'd version of dovecot for starters.
On 6/22/14, deano-dove...@areyes.com wrote:
>
>
> For those of you using virtual users, and SQL, how are you managing
> your users and their home dirs ? That is, what process do you use for
> adding/deleting users, creating their home dirs etc ? I suppose it's
> easy enough to do manually, inserti
Yes there is, kind of, if you use imapproxy (you should be if you run
a busy server) it will cache logins for n* time, then doveadm using
the IP of the webmail will show them.
On 7/3/14, ihab wrote:
> Hello,
> i using roundcube with dovecot, i have a question if there is possible to
> know the n
stop mail server daemons (you DO have a backup MX I hope if you only
have one mail server), rsync, (or if theres not much, sshfs and "cp
-a") start mail server daemons.
if this is a different machine, with new IP, hope you changed your DNS
to TTL 0 - and did it at least 24 hours ago so changes ar
On 7/11/14, CJ Keist wrote:
see inlines, its what we needed, we found dovecots default is great -
for SOHO, but hopeless for ISP size use which is what you need, I
wish Timo would include a conf file for large organisations, by
defaults we had issues same as you all limits way too low
>
> serv
On 7/12/14, Steve Litt wrote:
> experience with Debian Wheezy is that lo "goes down" a lot, so this is
> one of the first things I do when odd stuff happens.
>
Use a better operating system then, I've used at work and home, suse,
opensuse, rhel, centos, slackware and fedora, and never in my all
On 7/14/14, Jiri Bourek wrote:
> On 14.7.2014 00:24, Nick Edwards wrote:
>> On 7/12/14, Steve Litt wrote:
>>
>>> experience with Debian Wheezy is that lo "goes down" a lot, so this is
>>> one of the first things I do when odd stuff happens.
&
you need to show doveconf -n
and what you have in the master.conf for dovecot
On 7/15/14, Ricardo Branco wrote:
> I have been trying looking though all the wiki documents to setup LMTP.
> It now seems to all be connected except that it keeps saying that the
> user is not recognised when postfix s
On 7/15/14, Jiri Bourek wrote:
> On 15.7.2014 11:13, Nick Edwards wrote:
>> On 7/14/14, Jiri Bourek wrote:
>>> On 14.7.2014 00:24, Nick Edwards wrote:
>>>> On 7/12/14, Steve Litt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> experience with Debian Wheezy is tha
On 7/26/14, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 25.07.2014 um 16:12 schrieb Eduardo Ramos:
>> I did not understand what the advantage of use dovecot LMTP with
>> director too.
>
> in "very short" words...
> with nfs ,the director should avoid concurrent events
> which may happen with lmtp too, depending
On 7/29/14, Daniel Parthey wrote:
> Nick Edwards wrote:
>> On 7/26/14, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> > Am 25.07.2014 um 16:12 schrieb Eduardo Ramos:
>> >> I did not understand what the advantage of use dovecot LMTP with
>> >> director too.
>> &g
Es ist in Ordnung, nichts dagegen Reindl, er ist so perfekt und macht
nie einen Fehler seit der Geburt :->
On 7/31/14, Michael Grimm wrote:
> Hi --
>
> My sincerest apologies to all, but ...
>
> On 30.07.2014, at 21:03, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> Account gehackt oder Volltrottel?
>
> ... that was
sod off dictator who the fuck do you think you are to tell people how to post
On 8/4/14, Reindl Harald wrote:
> STOP to post HTML and convert even plaintext messages
>
> Am 04.08.2014 um 12:50 schrieb Timothy Murphy:
>> On Monday, August 04, 2014 12:14:44 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> > I
On 9/11/14, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
> Halo,
>
> Has anyones had experiences with feeding usenet into imap folders, we
> like to have some group for all user, any problem with message limit?
> We only want the text newsgroups?
>
Thats crazy!
Depending on your news feed that will get huge over time
On 9/12/14, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
> On 9/12/14, Nick Edwards wrote:
>> On 9/11/14, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
>>> Halo,
>>>
>>> Has anyones had experiences with feeding usenet into imap folders, we
>>> like to have some group for all user, any problem
On 9/13/14, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 06:33 AM, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
>>>
>> We looked at inn, it is, to be blunt, a diabolical mess , the access
>> file is nightmare, it no limit user concurrency or daily limit by
>> default without write external code, if inn is typical, is no wonder
See Private
On 9/14/14, LuKreme wrote:
> On 13 Sep 2014, at 20:37 , Edwardo Garcia wrote:
>> Sorry, but Nick was right, it is severe pain to get to do what we
>> would need, I installed dnews, and oh my god, it is so much cleaner
>> and configurable out the box that it took 10 minutes to config
We were supposed to get an update to fix this (and other bugs) over a
month or more ago if I remember right, but developer seems to be on
extended hiatus
On 10/3/14, Bartłomiej Nogaś wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I confirm this bug with LDAP userdb. The temporary workaround is to set
> quota ignore rule for S
jesus!
learn to use precedence
On 11/26/14, Harry Mills wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an issue with a vacation message in a sieve script. I can't see
> an error in the script itself.
>
> Pigeonhole version: 0.4.2-32
> Dovecot Version: 2.2.10
>
> The script was created by Ingo (part of the Horde suite
actually . you are, i missed it all the noise horde seems to generate,
precedence covers pretty much all of that crap, i was glad I left
horde, seems its still as stuffed as ever
On 11/26/14, Nick Edwards wrote:
> jesus!
> learn to use precedence
>
>
> On 11/26/14, Harry Mill
On 12/5/14, ML mail wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am wondering which variant is more secure for user authentication and
> password scheme. Basically I am looking at both variants:
>
> 1) MD5-CRYPT password scheme storage with CRAM-MD5 auth mechanism
> 2) SHA512-CRYPT password scheme storage with PLAIN aut
On 12/26/14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 26.12.2014 um 02:20 schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
>> On 12/26/14, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
>>> On Dec 25, 2014 3:15 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
your Gentoo is nice in a small environment
on larger setups someone is using binary packages and can s
On 12/26/14, Marc Stürmer wrote:
>
>
> Maildir is fine as long as you don't have too much mail on your
> storage, but there comes a point when you are getting big enough where
> Maildir really isn't going to behave really nicely anymore, because
> too many files and way too many seeks. Mdbox is qu
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
