oking at fetchmail/procmail for all these kinds
of things.
Also, deleting messages from the server does not necessarily require
POP3. You can receive a message via IMAP, flag it deleted and expunge it
from the server just as you can retrieve and delete it from the server
via POP3
--
Mark Sapiro
On 11:59 AM, Carlos Williams wrote:
>
> Is there a log level or something I am not searching for that will
> allow me to see failed or invalid logins for Dovecot (IMAP)?
What auth method are you using? For example, if you are using pam, the
failures are probably in /var/log/secure.
>>
>> To prove my guess, you should start with an empty mailbox and a fresh
>> thunderbird profile.
>>
>>
>
> Yes, I did with the same result.
> Does it work for you?
shift+del works for me with TB 3.0 and Dovecot 1.2.9.
--
Mark Sapiro The highwa
Papp Tamas wrote:
>
>On 2010. 01. 07. 20:08, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>> shift+del works for me with TB 3.0 and Dovecot 1.2.9.
>>
>>
>
>Could you send me a diff agains the default dovecot.conf?
Here's my dovecot -n
# dovecot -n
# 1.2.9: /usr/local/etc/d
Stephan,
I've recently been playing around with packaging dovecot 2.0 and
dovecot-2.0-pigeonhole, as well as the --enable-header-install configure
options of both. This lead me to the following question. Should pigeonhole's
sieve binaries rely on static libstorage / other dovecot libraries? It see
com list as a Mailman 'anonymous' list. Then
any mail to accountspaya...@mydomain.com is distributed to the list
members From: accountspaya...@mydomain.com.
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
oked something in the config or I have something
wrong, but I don't know what.
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
the whole config file you need to specify -o
pop3_uidl_format=... to dsync.
Mark--- dovecot-2.0.21/src/dsync/dsync-worker-local.c 2012-02-12 21:12:34.0 +
+++ dovecot-2.0.21.new/src/dsync/dsync-worker-local.c 2013-04-11 09:05:05.0 +0100
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include "istre
atures for v2.3. :)
It's installed and running here. Congratulations (big round of applause)
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
2.2.4, but the above hasn't changed for a long time.
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
difference may be that I am connecting to pop3s, port 995 with SSL,
not port 110 with STARTTLS.
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
(int)orig_headers[j].value_len,
(int)fetch_headers[i].value_len,
(const char *)fetch_headers[i].value,
(int)fetch_headers[i].value_len);
Have I read this upside down or is there an issue with the tests? If it
is an issue with the tests, any pointers as to where to start looking
for the issue would be helpful.
Thanks,
Mark
Background.
A while back I upgraded my phone to one currently using Android 4.1.2
and K9 mail 4.409. This phone/MUA combination seems at times to go crazy
making IMAP connections.
At first, I had mail_max_userip_connections = 30 (my largest imap
account has 19 folders). The issue I had at that ti
se maildir as well, I've not worked with system
users for a decade, but I think in postfix home_mailbox = Maildir/ will do
it, with sendmail its much more tricky and your best
sticking with mbox, if exim, NFI - dont use it :)
--
Mark
--0-
--
thout the
preceding '.', which seems to work without incident with the Maildir
format.
...and in case it's not quite obvious by this point, the intricacies
of e-mail storage are not my long suite. I bow to the great a
> That's a filesystem problem.
I figured as much.
> The users do have distinct home directories (from passwd) separated from
the mail location?
Yeah, in this case /home/mark is the home folder. If necessary I can
remove the mail_location directive and test using the users home dir
running the patched 2.2.11 with no problems.
As noted in another post, the patch can be applied without hg via
patch -p1 < /path/to/patch
in the dovecot unpack directory followed by the normal 'make', 'sudo
make install'
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
st make a RC release and the final v2.2.13 tomorrow. Please
> try it out!
Installed here. OK so far ...
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
ther
than handled according to filter_action.
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
dovecot 2.2.13 works very nicely here via pkgsrc on NetBSD.
cheers
mark
On 10/03/2014 08:34 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.14.rc1.tar.gz
Installed here and working so far.
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
I don't know if this is significant or not, but it is at least unusual here.
First we see this:
> Oct 9 10:10:03 sbh16 dovecot: imap(mark): Error: Sync failed for mbox file
> /var/spool/mail/mark: seq=393 uid=201517 uid_broken=0 originally needed 0
> bytes, now needs 66 by
protocol
tests) to reject the majority of zombie type spammers. The postfix
documentation is good and very thorough.
--
Kind Regards,
Mark Homoky
IT Consultant
The log messages are attached.
The core dump is at
<https://www.dropbox.com/s/9i80ms7xkyxoqj7/core.26450?dl=0>
The server is
$ uname -a
Linux sbh16.songbird.com 2.6.18-8.1.14.el5 #1 SMP Thu Sep 27 18:58:54
EDT 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for ga
On 12/01/2014 12:56 AM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
> Please see http://dovecot.markmail.org/thread/xqu3yr52c6hjxqk2
Thank you. I'll install the patches. Since the Panic is very rare on my
server, I won't really know if they help, but this look like my issue.
--
Mark Sapiro The h
is work, I'd be very interesting in seeing the doveconf -n
output, the permissions on the mailbox directories, the nsswitch.conf, and
anything else you had to tweak to get this working.
I'd really love to have AD authentication working on this setup!
--Mark
I don't see any relationship to attachments, it happens even without.
Mark Nienberg
The first word of the subject line probably says enough and shows my
predisposition. Actually I used to like Outlook until we switched to
IMAP, at which point my love turned to hate.
I have a single user on Outlook 2007 complaining about (a) mail "stuck"
in the outbox that is not delivered (u
st of things to do.
1.0.0 update from RC15 went smoothly here.
Thanks,
Mark Nienberg
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 12:20 -0700, Mark Nienberg wrote:
This minor problem still exists in the current version.
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2006-December/018251.html
It's my own fault, I kept meaning to test one of the latest versions before the 1.0
releas
hi,
i'm trying to read the mails of virtual users by setting the value of
mail_location to /mail/virtual/%d/%u/Maildir. however, the %d does
not resolve to the domain. i am using ldap as my passdb and userdb.
what am i missing here?
using this telnet session,
| $ telnet localhost imap
| Tryin
Axel Thimm wrote:
Are people interested in seeing 1.0.1rcX packaged?
Not the RC, but I'm on the edge of my seat to see if 1.0.1 final is available on
ATrpms before end of life for Fedora Core 5.
Mark
nt address book, calendar and palm sync) because as an email client
Outlook was useless.
/mark
I have the following set in the main level of my dovecot.conf file:
mail_location = maildir:/var/mail/virtual/%u
I decided to enable the lda protocol for local delivery from postfix,
so I could use sieve plugins. The lda protocol seems to ignore
settings in the rest of the dovecot.conf file
I asked this question in a more detailed post, with no response, so
I'm going to ask point blank. Is there a way make dovecot's deliver
use default mailbox and directory settings?
I'm thinking of the mail_location parameter, which deliver seems to
ignore.
Thanks!
--
Mark Edwards
x27;t really start working properly until about beta9. You
need to upgrade to get true public folders support.
Mark
e your config
should without modification when you upgrade, and its far easier than
building from source.
--
Mark Edwards
On Jun 27, 2007, at 1:30 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 00:18 -0700, Mark Edwards wrote:
I have the following set in the main level of my dovecot.conf file:
mail_location = maildir:/var/mail/virtual/%u
I decided to enable the lda protocol for local delivery from postfix,
so I
On Jun 28, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.6.2007, at 5.12, Mark Edwards wrote:
Unless I specifically have /var/mail/virtual returned as home in
the ldap lookup, deliver can't find the directory. In other
words, it doesn't seem to respect the above mail_location
d in fact doesn't seem to
have any affect unless the mail attribute is set. So, is it correct
that mail_location is the rule, unless mail is set in user_attrs, in
which case mail_location is overridden with the attributes from
user_attrs? Is that how it works?
--
Mark Edwards
as far as I can tell, yet I get
errors if I don't set it or set it to nothing. I have it set to
return the home attribute right now, but that isn't used.
Anyway, otherwise it all makes perfect sense to me now. Thank you
for your patience and time!
--
Mark Edwards
On Jun 28, 2007, at 1:01 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:52 -0700, Mark Edwards wrote:
One thing that still puzzles me is why userdb has to be set at all.
In my case its totally unnecessary as far as I can tell, yet I get
errors if I don't set it or set it to nothin
On Jun 28, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.6.2007, at 23.10, Mark Edwards wrote:
For v1.1 I'll add new global mail_uid and mail_gid settings. Then
if you
use them userdb won't be needed.
I am using user_global_uid and user_global_gid, and so there is no
reason for
pe, which I still use for full backups.
P.S. consider maildrop instead of procmail if you switch to maildir. See info in
the dovecot wiki.
Mark
o
I assume that 1.0.1 is fixing some problem caused by the previous 1.0.0 and I have
not been worrying about it. No user complaints, and it only seems to happen once per
mailbox.
Mark
nsfer your old settings into it and then rename it to
"dovecot.conf". Then start dovecot.
Mark
fine.
Mark
/dovecot/auth-master
mode: 384
user: vmail
Can anyone help?
Thanks,
Mark
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 04:17:43PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 14:50 +0100, Matthias Kellermann wrote:
> > If a user creates his own .dovecot.sieve file the global script will not
> > work anymore.
> >
> > How can I enable global and local per-user sieve scripts at once? Is
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:49:16PM +0300, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
> RFC3028 say:
Not an answer, but note that RFC3028 has been superseded by RFC5228.
mm
;
procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=/usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -m .mail.tuxonice"
The email then ends up in my INBOX instead.
Can anyone help me how to fix this?
/Mark
u for pointing me to the dovecot log files. I thought all errors
would be listed in the procmail log. It was a missing postmaster_address
in the lda section.
Thank you for your assistance.
/Mark
Folks - With Dovecot 1.0.7, we're seemingly unable to
authenticate users for out-going SMTP access who are
not residing directly within the main system passwd/shadow
files.
(I.e. the users seeded within our non-system "dovecot"
userdbs & passwd files have no "smtp-auth" joy! (Ye
olde "Relaying de
t; > files.
>
> Which means you haven't configured your MTA to authenticate using
> Dovecot!
>
> You didn't mention what MTA you're using.. If you're using Postfix or
> Exim, see http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndDovecotSASL or
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/EximAndDovecotSASL
>
--
Mark R. Baith
University of Maryland (UMD)
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center (ESSIC)
mba...@essic.umd.edu / P:(301)314.2629 / F:(301)405.8648
Hi i have trouble getting my public folders working properly. I have a
few issues atm with them.
First off i'm using version 2.0.9 as it came with CentOS and would
greatly prefer to keep this version.
Here is my dovecot.conf file
# dovecot -n
# 2.0.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32
<<< image/gif: EXCLUDED >>>
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 01:30:07AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 23.3.2007, at 19.40, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> dovecot: Mar 22 13:35:39 Error: IMAP(dvtest) [18381]: Maildir
> /mnt/mailcache/dvtest/.box1 sync: UID inserted in the middle of
> mailbox
> (16251 > 6588, file = 1174
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:15:38PM +0100, Hugo Monteiro wrote:
>
> I've had several setups for SPAM/Virus handling in qmail servers,
> and the best solution so far was a combination of simscan + dspam +
> clamav. All the other qmail-queue replacements i've tried, including
> qpsmtpd, where jus
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 10:30:25PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> I just figured out that O_APPEND is pretty great. If the operating
> system updates seek position after writing to a file opened with
> O_APPEND, writes to Dovecot's transaction log file can be made
> lockless. I see that thi
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:04:23PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
> http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig
Congratulations on the big one-oh! (oh)
And thanks,
mm
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 03:52:14PM +0200, Matthias Kellermann wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> }
>
> elseif header :contains ["to", "Cc", "Bcc"]
sieve has "elsif" .. not "elseif"
Dunno if that is the problem, but:
> May 6 15:47:08 gehirnschnecke deliver: sieve parse error for
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: li
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:16:41PM +0800, M1 wrote:
> Referring to
> http://wiki.fastmail.fm/wiki/index.php/SieveExtensionsSupportMatrix , there
> is already a include sieve extensive and it is already implemented by cmu
> cyrus ==>2.3<==
>
> The rfc draft is here ===>
> http://www.ietf.org/in
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 07:41:53PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> - Get the rewritten Squat full text search index working. It probably
> needs a name change, since it's not all that close to Cyrus Squat
> anymore. Suggestions? Could of course be just "fts_dovecot".
"squatimo" ? (or squatmo)
Mr.
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 08:45:31AM +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 May 2007, M1 wrote:
>
> I glanced over the current Sieve library (CMU):
>
> >1) 3 global scripts, 1 execute before user script, 1 execute after user
> >script, 1 execute only if there is no user script.
>
> I didn't
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 08:42:20PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 20:24 +0200, Jakob Hirsch wrote:
>
> > Not that it matters much, but isn't it spelled "dovecotE"?
>
> My dictionary suggests both are valid:
Maybe he's thinking of John Bigboote
mm
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 12:32:44PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Hi,
I don't know much about the sieve implementation used by dovecot LDA,
so these are just generic remarks.
>
> Since I will soon be attempting to get this working on one of my
> client's systems, I posed a question on the post
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:57:11AM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> At 12:42 AM -0400 9/18/07, Benjamin R. Haskell imposed structure on
> a stream of electrons, yielding:
... [existence of maildirfolder file]
> >
> >had no ill effect on the visibility of my folders. That said, I also
> >don't use
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:37:12AM +0100, Ian P. Christian wrote:
> Is it possible to modify an emails subject line in a sieve script?
>
> I've seen references to 'addtag' whilst googling, but it appears
> dovecots implementation doens't support it - are there any other methods?
I dunno from "add
I am a pretty heavy user of Sieve, and one of the services where I have
extensive Sieve scripts is Protonmail. For my own mailserver setup, Dovecot's
sieve-test has been excellent. I have a library of example email messages, and
my own tooling setup for being able to test whether a given change
successfully connected from Outlook using active
domain credentials?
If so, what's the secret? What am I not doing correctly?
Thanks for any and all help! --Mark
dovecot log:
Feb 07 23:39:40 auth: Debug: Loading modules from directory:
/usr/local/lib/dovecot/auth
Feb 07 23:39:40 aut
NTLM authentication? As far as I know, I don't have Squid. If I leave off
the
--helper-protocol bit on the ntlm_auth command line, it returns an OK status.
Is there a way to NOT pass "--helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp"? Would this
help?
--Mark
-Original Message-
Date:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 12:04 PM Mark Moseley wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 11:37 PM Aki Tuomi
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 01 February 2019 at 23:16 Mark Moseley < moseleym...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Running: Ubuntu xenial, dovecot 2.2.3
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 1:59 PM Mark Moseley wrote:
> This has got to be something weird in my config. And the standard
> disclaimer of '"happy to post doveconf -n, but wanted to see if this is
> normal first" :)
>
> Background: Ubuntu Xenial, running 2.2.36. Mailbo
Is it possible that no one on this list is authenticating Outlook with Dovecot
and NTLM?
--Mark
-Original Message-
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:51:01 -0500
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: Need to authenticate Outlook and NTLM
From: Mark Foley via dovecot
More on this ...
I short
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:17:16 - Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2019-02-13, Mark Foley via dovecot wrote:
> > Is it possible that no one on this list is authenticating Outlook with
> > Dovecot and NTLM?
>
> Yes, it's possible, the outdated instructions you found o
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 08:53:13 +0200 Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> On 19.2.2019 4.48, Mark Foley via dovecot wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:17:16 - Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> On 2019-02-13, Mark Foley via dovecot wrote:
> >>> Is it possible that no one on this li
anism?
Is there a solution to this?
THX --Mark
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:31 PM Chris Dillon
wrote:
> I’ve had the opportunity to test the same configuration with a fresh build
> of the git master branch (2.4.devel) and the issue also occurs there. I
> see that "mailbox_list_index = yes" is now enabled by default. It can
> still be disabled
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 4:46 AM Bernd Wurst via dovecot
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we're operating dovecot on a small server. Some years ago, we migrated
> from courier IMAP to dovecot. Therefore, we defined our default
> Namespace "inbox" with prefix "INBOX." to have this compatible. I found
> this in
Just hoping to get some dev eyes on this. I'm incredibly reluctant to throw
the word 'bug' around
(since 99 times out of 100, it's not -- it's almost always the config), but
I can't think of any way
that this could be a config issue, esp when the pre-2.2.34 version works as
expected.
I noticed dur
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:13 PM Mark Moseley wrote:
> Just hoping to get some dev eyes on this. I'm incredibly reluctant to
> throw the word 'bug' around
> (since 99 times out of 100, it's not -- it's almost always the config),
> but I can't think of a
I'm curious if this is still the right place to report potential bugs with
Dovecot.
Is there a Dovecot bug tracker somewhere?
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 2:35 PM John Fawcett via dovecot
wrote:
> On 09/04/2019 22:03, Mark Moseley via dovecot wrote:
> > I'm curious if this is still the right place to report potential bugs
> > with Dovecot.
> >
> > Is there a Dovecot bug tracker somewh
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 9:37 PM Mark Moseley wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:13 PM Mark Moseley
> wrote:
>
>> Just hoping to get some dev eyes on this. I'm incredibly reluctant to
>> throw the word 'bug' around
>> (since 99 times out of 1
TL;DR:
Can director_username_hash use %{userdb:...} or %{passdb:...} ?
This is on Ubuntu Precise, running dovecot 2.2.36. It's a fully production,
director-ized env, so assume everything is working correctly. Happy to post
doveconf if it's relevant but wanted
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:14 AM Aki Tuomi
wrote:
>
> > On 12 April 2019 21:09 Mark Moseley via dovecot
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > TL;DR:
> >
> > Can director_username_hash use %{userdb:...} or %{passdb:...} ?
> >
> > =
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 9:52 PM Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> On 10 April 2019 05:00 Mark Moseley via dovecot
> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 9:37 PM Mark Moseley < moseleym...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:13 PM Mark Moseley < moseleym
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 8:57 PM Niels Kobschätzki via dovecot <
dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote:
> On 9/9/19 6:18 PM, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
> > On 9 Sep 2019, at 09:27, Niels Kobschätzki
> wrote:
> >> The moment I remove those folders, the size gets calculated correctly.
> Unfortunately those fold
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 11:22 PM Aki Tuomi via dovecot
wrote:
>
> On 21.11.2019 23.57, Marc Roos via dovecot wrote:
> > Is it possible to configure a network for a cert instead of an ip?
> >
> > Something like this:
> >
> > local 192.0.2.0 {
> > ssl_cert = > ssl_key = > }
> >
> > Or
>
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:31 AM Aki Tuomi
wrote:
>
> > On 27/11/2019 21:28 Mark Moseley via dovecot
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 11:22 PM Aki Tuomi via dovecot <
> dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 21.11.2019 23
I have a Linix server that won't boot. I've patched in a live CD and
mounted the original HDDs so I can browse the files using SSH.
I am trying to find where all my customer emails are stored so that I can
(hopefully) copy them off this "dead" server onto a new server which is also
running cPan
501 - 591 of 591 matches
Mail list logo
