Hi,
I am currently in the process of setting up an IMAP repository for round
100 users
Currently the user authentication method is being handled via a Windows
Domain Controller.
The host OS for Dovecot will either be FreeBSD or CentOS.
Would Dovecot be able to authenticate to either t
On 03/17/2012 07:36 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Kaya Saman wrote:
I am currently in the process of setting up an IMAP repository for
round 100 users
Currently the user authentication method is being handled via a
Windows Domain Controller.
The host OS for Dovecot will either be FreeBSD or
Thanks so much Sven for your indepth and complete responses!
Question: do you need public or shared folders?
I don't need anything apart from an IMAP storage solution. I don't
intend to tie in Dovecot with an MTA either as I will simply be using
this for storage.
Long story but we don't
On 03/17/2012 09:51 PM, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
Hi,
I am currently in the process of setting up an IMAP repository for round 100
users
Currently the user authentication method is being handled via a Windows Domain
Controller.
The host OS for Dovecot will either be FreeBSD or CentOS.
Woul
On 03/17/2012 10:28 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Kaya Saman wrote:
Question: do you need public or shared folders?
I don't need anything apart from an IMAP storage solution. I don't
intend to tie in Dovecot with an MTA either as I will simply be using
this for storage.
Long story bu
On 03/18/2012 12:04 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Kaya Saman wrote:
Flat files are not evil or bad or slow per se, but you have to use
them the right way.
Thanks a lot for that info. I will research more into this but I maybe
overridden at some point :-(
Need to make a strong case!
Hmm.
Just
On 03/18/2012 12:32 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Kaya Saman wrote:
Once we get setup this may come in quite handy! Not sure what's going
on currently as everyone above me is still quite set in using an SQL
DB as a mail storage system???
RDBMS where not designed for such a task. Using a relat
On 03/18/2012 09:16 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 3/17/2012 4:24 PM, Kaya Saman wrote:
Long story but we don't have any control over our mail server which is
handled by the parent company abroad and is on MS Exchange.
To use an IMAP storage solution is the only way to get rid of pesky MS
Hi,
I'm attempting to implement Dovecot 2.1.3 built on a FreeBSD 8.2 64
bit system from ports.
I had the servicve up and running on a local vbox demo which did a
very simple Maildir format sytem which was situated in ~/Maildir.
I would now like to expand the system and tie it to a Windows domai
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Kaya Saman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm attempting to implement Dovecot 2.1.3 built on a FreeBSD 8.2 64
> bit system from ports.
>
> I had the servicve up and running on a local vbox demo which did a
> very simple Maildir format sytem which
Hi,
I'm trying to setup Dovecot with MS AD and am using this as my guide:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/ActiveDirectoryNtlm
I can definitely access information on the AD server using wbinfo -g
and wbinfo -u.
Currently my dovecot.conf file looks like this:
# v1.1:
#auth_ntlm_use_winbin
I think the issue seems to be the mechanism between Dovecot and AD, so
basically PAM.
I adapted my pam.d file to this:
# auth
authsufficient pam_krb5.so no_warn
try_first_pass debug
#auth sufficient pam_ssh.so no_warn try_first_pass
aut
Hi,
I'm trying to configure a server to use SAMBA and Winbind to
authenticate to Active Directory I managed to get this portion up
and running even the Dovecot portion.
For reference something similar to this guide:
http://www.whitneytechnologies.com/?p=119
However PAM is slightly differen
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Trever L. Adams
wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 01:20 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
> Now what I would like to know is, which is better for "virtual
> hosting" Maildir or mbox?
>
>
> Basically my requirement is that I would like to separate users
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 2012-06-25 3:20 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>
>> # cat dovecot.conf
>> # v1.2+:
>> auth_use_winbind = yes
>
>
> Please always only provide output of doveconf -n, not copy/pastes from the
> config
On 06/25/2012 08:37 AM, Trever L. Adams wrote:
On 06/25/2012 01:20 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
Now what I would like to know is, which is better for "virtual
hosting" Maildir or mbox?
Basically my requirement is that I would like to separate users via
either individual folders and the
Hi,
though this is a bit of a side question, has anybody had an issue
while running Outlook 2010 with Dovecot?
The reason why I am asking is that I have setup a Dovecot 2.1.7 server
on FreeBSD which works fantastically with Thunderbird but Outlook
seems to be twice as slow in transferring informa
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 02/07/2012 15:34, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> though this is a bit of a side question, has anybody had an issue
>> while running Outlook 2010 with Dovecot?
>>
>>
> Yes, as far as be
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Mailing List SVR
wrote:
> Il 02/07/2012 16:34, Kaya Saman ha scritto:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> though this is a bit of a side question, has anybody had an issue
>> while running Outlook 2010 with Dovecot?
>>
>> The reason why I am a
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 02/07/2012 16:02, Giles Coochey wrote:
>>
>> On 02/07/2012 15:51, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Nicola,
>>>
>>> there is no specific difference apart from seeing many o
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 02/07/2012 16:22, Giles Coochey wrote:
>>
>> The size is in KB. I'm afraid cache-timeout and the inner workings
>> would be something only Timo or the Source Code know :-)
>>
> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Caching
>
> the TTL set
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 02/07/2012 16:22, Giles Coochey wrote:
>>
>> The size is in KB. I'm afraid cache-timeout and the inner workings
>> would be something only Timo or the Source Code know :-)
>>
> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Caching
>
> the TTL set
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 2.7.2012, at 19.12, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
>> what's really weird is that if I keep increasing the Cache TTL and
>> Cache size, the speed of transfer starts dropping.
>
> I think it may just be a coinciden
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 3.7.2012, at 9.38, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
>> So if I look at a different authentication mechanism say LDAP would it
>> improve performance?
>
> I doubt authentication has anything to do with why Outlook downloads mail
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Arne K. Haaje wrote:
> Den 03.07.2012 08:58, skrev Kaya Saman:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3.7.2012, at 9.38, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>>
>>>> So if I look at a different auth
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:59 AM, J E Lyon
wrote:
> On 3 Jul 2012, at 07:46, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> On 3.7.2012, at 9.38, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>
>>> So if I look at a different authentication mechanism say LDAP would it
>>> improve performance?
>>
>>
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Jahnke-Zumbusch, Dirk
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> as I recall you are using OL2010 in an enterprise environment? In many
> cases home directories etc. are residing then on network shares. And
> that’s where .pst files and .ost files most probably are being written,
> too
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 2012-07-03 3:12 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>
>> However this is a clean server with plenty of space left on the pool
>> allocated for mail and it's additionally using ZFS too.
>
>
> What OS? ZFS impleme
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:57 AM, J E Lyon
wrote:
> On 3 Jul 2012, at 11:51, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
>> Yeah, it seems to be M$ implementation of IMAP. I don't think that
>> there's anything anyone can do Outlook seems to wait after each
>> transmission (found u
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Charles Marcus
> wrote:
>> On 2012-07-03 3:12 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>>
>>> However this is a clean server with plenty of space left on the pool
>>> allocated for m
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Robert Schetterer
wrote:
> Am 03.07.2012 13:00, schrieb Kaya Saman:
>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:57 AM, J E Lyon
>> wrote:
>>> On 3 Jul 2012, at 11:51, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yeah, it seems to be M$ implementa
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Robert Schetterer
wrote:
> Am 03.07.2012 13:32, schrieb Kaya Saman:
>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Charles Marcus
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 2012-07-03 3:12 AM, Kaya Sama
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Kaya Saman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Robert Schetterer
> wrote:
>> Am 03.07.2012 13:32, schrieb Kaya Saman:
>>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Charles Mar
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:03 PM, J E Lyon
wrote:
> On 3 Jul 2012, at 12:32, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
>> Ok now probably related to this is that some folders are not able to copy??
>>
>> While dragging one folder from Outlook PST to the Dovecot IMAP server
>> in Outlook 20
[...]
>
>
> That's not something as simple as permissions on the server end, is it?
I have my Maildir and parent folder permissions setup as:
rwx-- mail_user:mail_user
This should be ok shouldn't it or would I need to use rwxrwx- ??
By default it is created as stated at top of posting.
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:21 PM, J E Lyon
wrote:
> On 3 Jul 2012, at 13:11, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
>> It is Maildir I am using, checked permissions - they're all ok. Yeah
>> would be cur When connecting to this, do I need to put something
>> like Inbox or INBOX as
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 7/5/2012 2:44 AM, Adrian M wrote:
>
>> Hi Stan,
>> I know how to add drives to the storage and how to grow the existing
>> filesystem, but such big filesystems are somehow new to mainstream
>> linux. Yes, I know some university out there a
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:48 AM, J E Lyon
wrote:
> On 5 Jul 2012, at 10:45, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
>> But then one must think, do I really want to switch OS?
>
> I heard a rumour that switching OS is sometimes harder than adding a
> mountpoint :)
>
> J.
It can be!
That&
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:01 AM, J E Lyon
wrote:
> On 5 Jul 2012, at 10:55, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
>> That's why I'm not even thinking of migrating the mission critical
>> stuff running on CentOS 5 to even CentOS 6 yet.
>
> I'm in an identical position there -
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 2012-07-05 5:45 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>
>> FreeBSD 8.2 x64 running on VMware
>
>
> Hi Kaya,
>
> Do you (or anyone else) know of any decent VMWare images (appliance) of
> current version of FreeBSD? I&#
40 matches
Mail list logo
