On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Giles Coochey <gi...@coochey.net> wrote: > On 02/07/2012 16:02, Giles Coochey wrote: >> >> On 02/07/2012 15:51, Kaya Saman wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi Nicola, >>> >>> there is no specific difference apart from seeing many of these errors: >>> >>> Jun 26 15:10:11 imap(<user>): Error: Index >>> /mail/AD_Mail//<user>/Maildir/.Archive/dovecot.index: Lost log for >>> seq=2 offset=77008 >>> Jun 26 15:10:11 imap(<user>): Warning: fscking index file >>> /mail/AD_Mail//<user>/Maildir/.Archive/dovecot.index >>> Jun 26 15:10:11 imap(<user>): Error: Fixed index file >>> /mail/AD_Mail//<user>/Maildir/.Archive/dovecot.index: log_file_seq 2 >>> -> 3 >>> Jun 26 15:10:26 auth: Error: Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0xa2088207 >>> Jun 26 15:10:26 auth: Error: Got user=[<user>] domain=[] >>> workstation=[WKS-41] len1=24 len2=278 >>> Jun 26 15:10:26 auth: Error: Login for user []\[<user>]@[WKS-41] >>> failed due to [Reading winbind reply failed!] >>> Jun 26 15:10:32 auth: Error: Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0xa2088207 >>> >>> >>> >> From the Dovecot wiki about ntlm_auth: >> >> Dovecot currently does blocking lookups, so if ntlm_auth is slow on >> responding (e.g. network problems), Dovecot blocks all other authentication >> requests until it's finished. >> >> Just wondering if Outlook parallelises it's sessions and ntlm_auth is >> blocking because of the timing between the requests. >> >> Have you tried a test user with local authentication? >> > Or perhaps try > > auth_cache_size = 1024 > > To cache authentications. > > > -- > Regards, > > Giles Coochey, CCNA, CCNAS > NetSecSpec Ltd > +44 (0) 7983 877438 > http://www.coochey.net > http://www.netsecspec.co.uk > gi...@coochey.net > >
Thanks Giles :-) I think that has made things a bit better...... In terms of the cache, is that measured in seconds?? Regards, Kaya
