Or. maybe it is the holidays and people actually have a life?
On December 31, 2016 4:38:53 AM EST, mj wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Does the lack of replies mean that what I'm asking is not possible?
>
>(or am I missing something SO obvious that nobody bothers to point it
>out..?)
>
>MJ
>
>On 12/29/2016 09:23
I can't provide specific details as I'm on the road, but I successfully used
mmv utility to accomplish something similar - changed mail home from
domain/local@domain to just domain/local for about 65 users, took less than a
second once I worked out the command (it supports wildcards) . The trick
People, PLEASE do not engage Reindl on the list, it always results in
this kind of garbage that the adults on the list could do without.
If you feel compelled to 'call him out', then by all means do so, but do
it PRIVATELY.
Thanks.
On 4/2/2015 11:28 PM, Nick Edwards wrote:
> you wouldnt know, y
Since you have confirmed that someone else you know is using it on
FreeBSD+ZFS without these problems, have you tried asking on the FreeBSD
support list(s)?
Seems like that may be your best bet, since it is certainly not a
generic dovecot problem (but may indeed be one or more of the settings
you
On 4/28/2015 1:40 PM, Tobias Franzén wrote:
> On 2014-01-08 14:32, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> On 2012-04-09 8:53 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On 9.4.2012, at 15.50, Charles Marcus wrote:
>>>>> LMTP adds a new Delivered-To: header when there is
>>>>&g
Hi all,
Ok, just need a quick-n-dirty way to enable a master user for a migration...
Reading the docs, I'm not sure what the bare minimum is I need to do this...
At: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/MasterUsers
The Example config shows:
auth_master_user_separator = *
passdb {
driver =
On 5/29/2015 9:25 AM, Dominik Breu wrote:
> Hello Charles,
>
> the bare minimum ist just the first passdb entry
> auth_master_user_separator = *
> passdb {
>driver = passwd-file
>args = /etc/dovecot/passwd.masterusers
>master = yes
>pass = yes
> }
>
> this will do the trick.
Than
On 5/29/2015 9:25 AM, Dominik Breu wrote:
> Hello Charles,
>
> the bare minimum ist just the first passdb entry
> auth_master_user_separator = *
> passdb {
>driver = passwd-file
>args = /etc/dovecot/passwd.masterusers
>master = yes
>pass = yes
> }
>
> this will do the trick.
Ok,
ce imap-login {
> inet_listener imap {
> port = 143
> }
> inet_listener imaps {
> port = 993
> ssl = yes
> }
> service_count = 0
> }
> service imap {
> process_limit = 2048
> }
> ssl = required
> ssl_cert = ssl_key = userdb {
> ar
On 5/29/2015 10:58 AM, Dominik Breu wrote:
> hello,
>
> in which way do you login ?
>
> loginuser*masteruser or just masteruser?
>
> You have to do the login with loginuser*masteruser masterpass
Thanks dominik, but I figured out what I did wrong...
I changed the password using htpasswd again, bu
On 6/1/2015 7:27 PM, SH Development wrote:
> Using SSL, ports 993, 587 PLAINTEXT.
Outlook Express won't work with the submission port (587) with STARTTLS.
You have to use port 465 (SSL/wrappermode)
On 6/8/2015 5:11 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Still I want read/write access to storage and want to use mbox as
> storage (also for easier backup and copy)...
>
> And my question was how to properly read and write from/to mbox files
> which are used by dovecot.
There is no method for doing this. Any
On 6/9/2015 8:36 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 6/8/2015 5:11 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>> Still I want read/write access to storage and want to use mbox as
>> storage (also for easier backup and copy)...
>>
>> And my question was how to properly read and write from/to mb
On 1/27/2016 1:30 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> Sending bandwitdh can be reduced by using BCC instead of the IMAP append
> to the sent mailbox.
Hi Steffen,
Can you elaborate on this?
I would have thought that the IMAP Append command would *save* bandwidth
(as opposed to having the client save a
On 1/27/2016 9:32 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
>> On 1/27/2016 1:30 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
>>> Sending bandwitdh can be reduced by using BCC instead of the IMAP
Hello,
I have an el-cheapo shared hosting account on Dreamhost, and have had it
for a very long time.
For the most part everything usually works fairly well, considering I do
keep a lot of folders, and mail, on some of my accounts.
They are running dovecot, but still don't have a response as to
fen Kaiser wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
>> My problem is, one of my most used folders, which was working fine up
>> until a week or so ago, stopped loading the messages, and after some
>>
On 3/9/2016 9:02 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 08 Mar 2016, at 01:50, Pavel Stano wrote:
>>
>> sis attachment deduplication is broken in 2.2.16 upwards.
>> It is caused by this commit.
>> https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/664bf3e236c214aee86294483c379e4fa66c2e63
>>
>> in src/lib-fs/fs-sis.c
On 3/11/2016 9:58 AM, Juan Bernhard wrote:
> Be careful to no do any synchronous writes under ZFS. Every sync write
> can take up to 3 seconds of latency (under freebsd, I didnt test ZFS in
> linux). Im using it in a 3k user environment and works great with a 4TB
> raid 10, and dovecot cache fi
On 3/10/2016 7:56 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 11 Mar 2016, at 02:37, Charles Marcus wrote:
>>
>> On 3/9/2016 9:02 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On 08 Mar 2016, at 01:50, Pavel Stano wrote:
>>>> sis attachment deduplication is broken in 2.2.16 up
On 3/18/2016 5:58 PM, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> Is anyone opposed to changing dovecot's handling of
> recipient_delimiter so that it's the same as that of postfix? If not,
> I am willing to rebase/merge/address review comments on Lennart
> Weller's patch[1] to get this functionality upstream.
>
> Whi
Greetings Mike and Timo,
A question about BURL support in Thunderbird came up, and while there is
an open bug, it apparently is still not implemented.
I'd love to see this get done, so I've been checking on the status of
this in both postfix and dovecot...
Can someone comment on whether or not t
On 4/29/2016 5:58 AM, Carl A Jeptha wrote:
> I have an old postfix + dovecot + Roundcube mailserver
> (mail.domain.Tld). Server clock is loosing time and adjusting it causes
> dovecot to kill itself, we cannot install more memory, bigger
> hard-drives, etc.
>
> I have built a new server box
We
On July 16, 2016 4:02:33 AM EDT, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
>Since I have quite some experiece with thunderbird, I know most of
>its shortcomings
Care to elaborate? Thunderbird is far from perfect, but is by far the best IMAP
client available.
Most times you can work around supposed short comings
On 2011-07-21 2:38 PM, qm...@top-consulting.net wrote:
> Are there any mail clients that automatically pull in folder contents
> even though they don't have a subscription to that folder ?
>
> I have defined a namespace with subscriptions=yes, hidden=yes and
> list=yes. There are no subscriptions
On 2011-08-19 12:14 PM, Felipe Scarel wrote:
> I'm setting up a Dovecot environment here, version 1.2.15 on Debian 6.0.2
> "squeeze". This is actually a complete revamp of the previous setup we have
> in-place here, built from the ground up with updated versions of all
> involved software.
>
> Th
On 2011-08-21 4:24 PM, resea...@the10thfloor.com
wrote:
> DOVECOT:
> # 2.0.beta6 (3156315704ef): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
UPGRADE.
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-08-26 3:07 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
> dovecot-2.0-0.10.beta6.20100630.el6.x86_64
Don't need to read further.
Upgrade to a recent stable release - if that doesn't fix your problem,
*then* come back and ask again...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-09-15 9:40 AM, Tom Clark wrote:
Have I missed anthing!?!?
Only to please not copy/paste from your config files, but post output of
doveconf -n.
This ensures that your settings really are what you think they are.
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-09-19 7:03 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
Another problem -- AFAIK, outlook is only 32bit. My mom gets
harassed, constantly to move things out of her primary .pst file and
into 'archives', (where she can't easily access them and they don't
have to be indexed...) because, the internal format beca
On 2011-09-19 7:22 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
If the root user is receiving emails, these need to be redirected to
another user so they can be read via IMAP.
I guess the source needs a patch.
Only if you like wasting your time.
Why would dovecot choose to play nursemaid to people who want to
On 2011-09-20 6:30 AM, dove...@lists.grepular.com
wrote:
On 20/09/11 11:21, Charles Marcus wrote:
IMAP support got much better in 2007,
How did it get better? They removed NAMESPACE support when moving from
2003 to 2007, which was a complete ball ache for us.
2003 was basically unusable
On 2011-09-20 4:03 PM, Anton Aylward wrote:
I wish that Thunderbird would NOT index mail on my laptop, but it does.
So turn it (GLODA) off...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-09-20 5:37 PM, Anton Aylward wrote:
Charles Marcus said the following on 09/20/2011 04:22 PM:
On 2011-09-20 4:03 PM, Anton Aylward wrote:
I wish that Thunderbird would NOT index mail on my laptop, but it does.
So turn it (GLODA) off...
Ah
https://wiki.mozilla.org
=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, secured
Please help it is urgent.
--
Best regards,
Charles Marcus
I.T. Director
Media Brokers International, Inc.
678.514.6200 x224 | 678.514.6299 fax
On 2011-09-19 1:05 PM, Rick Baartman wrote:
From my secure log:
Sep 19 01:16:44 lin12 dovecot-auth: pam_unix(dovecot:auth): check pass; user
unknown
Sep 19 01:16:44 lin12 dovecot-auth: pam_unix(dovecot:auth): authentication
failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=dovecot ruser= rhost=:::64.31
On 2011-09-24 9:30 PM, Terry Carmen wrote:
This is with dovecot 2.0.beta6 (3156315704ef)
Does anybody have any suggestions?
Upgrade - which probably won't fix your problem, but because the version
you're using is so old should be considered a requirement before asking
for further help.
--
On 2011-09-26 10:07 AM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
So I added some folders back to the users Maildir directory and made
sure ownership on the Linux side was correct. I just can't see where
in Thunderbird, the user is able to see folders in her Maildir that
she's unsubscribed to and how we enable the
On 2011-09-26 10:16 AM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Charles Marcus
wrote:
Right-click on any folder under the account, then click 'Subscribe'...
I don't think we're on the same page here. I restored the folders off
tape and moved them ba
On 2011-09-27 2:06 PM, Ed W wrote:
On 20/09/2011 03:10, Kui Zhang wrote:
thunderbird does not really work for us, due to amount of emails per
mailbox. It was hogging all the memory + cpu.
I think if you disable the new local indexing features in TB then it
should start running fairly decentl
On 2011-09-27 6:42 PM, Jerry wrote:
I have always found Outlook to be much faster than TB. In any case,
Outlook 2007 is an old version. I am using the 2010 version at work and
it is a much more polished application than the 2010 version and far
superior to TB.
That's funny - I find Outlooks em
On 2011-10-19 3:40 PM, ghandidrivesahum...@rocketfish.com
wrote:
I just recently installed Dovecot 2.0.15. Unfortunately, doveadm segfaults
when I attempt to connect to the local dovecot instance. When this occurs,
my logs show:
2011-10-19T12:31:23-07:00 mail02 dovecot: doveadm: Error: doveadm
On 2011-10-21 6:43 AM, nuno marques wrote:
The system as a whole is composed of:dovecot-2.0-0.10.beta6.20100630.el6.x86_64
Fyi, this is really old, you should upgrade to the latest version...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-10-25 6:14 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
and everyfrackin' body was using 4K packet sizes (at the application
level!, the window size on TCP was over 64K...but no one was using
it)especially galling with my network's MTU at 9K, BTW, because
small packets are really bad on a 1Gb network.
se
= postfix
mode = 0660
user = postfix
}
user = root
}
ssl_cert =
--
Best regards,
Charles Marcus
I.T. Director
Media Brokers International, Inc.
678.514.6200 x224 | 678.514.6299 fax
On 2011-10-31 8:10 AM, Vlad wrote:
I have 2.0.beta6 (3156315704ef)
Upgrade, then come back with any questions...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-11-14 10:58 PM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
Might wanna make a note on the wiki page that the DRAC setup is only for
dovecot 1.x?
Why? You were on the wiki for v1, so obviously it is (or may be) only
meant for v1.
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-12-06 5:13 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
* "Trash" is used by all clients
Outlook uses 'Deleted Items', not 'Trash'...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-12-07 5:25 AM, Yann Dupont wrote:
Right now, we archive and then delete the mailbox directories (we don't
use special dovecot mecanism : we migrated from another system not long
time ago and we had special scripts for that).
If we use SIS, what happen to the attachements ? The usage co
On 2011-12-07 8:55 AM, Pascal Volk
wrote:
On 12/07/2011 02:28 PM Arne K. Haaje wrote:
> Thunderbird also use a Templates folder.
Yes, I also noticed that. But
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154#section-2 doesn't mention a mailbox
for templates.
Nevertheless, it is very handy functionality.
Your emails are extremely poorly formatted and too much trouble to try
to read.
If you want to get help, you should learn how to properly compose an email.
On 2011-12-19 1:19 PM, I M wrote:
Thank you for the response, Pascal!But I have read the all flags and functions
that might be useful fo
On 2011-12-21 2:42 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. I did some reading to get a better
understanding. We'll probably stick with this and may go for LIST if the
server does not announce LIST-EXTENTED
So... out of curoisity, does dovecot support LIST-EXTENDED?
--
Be
On 2011-12-21 11:18 PM, Simon Brereton
wrote:
It would be interesting to chart the number of threads caused by each
distro. I don't know who would have the least, but I suspect gentoo and
centos would be out in front,
Been using gentoo since about 2003 and never looked back... best and
easie
On 2011-12-28 11:06 PM, Dongyu.Zhen wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> When I modify the dovecot imap source ,in "src/imap/" dir, I meet the
> Error below:
> Error: child (imap) kill (core dump disabled).
>
> In fact, I want to record the imap operation through dovecot. So, I
> modify every source file
On 2011-12-28 5:05 PM, David Pottage wrote:
Secondly creating a second account makes the authentication on the
server a lot more complex. Either I need two OS level accounts on
the sever, and find ways to keep them in sync, or I need to create a
custom authentication method on dovecot or PAM so
I think Stan already pointed you to where your problem most likely lies,
but just wanted to point out that this:
On 2011-12-30 1:53 PM, Calvin Cochran wrote:
Most of our clients, including this one, use SSL or TLS and connect
on 993.
I believe is incorrect. Port 993 is for IMAP over SSL, if
On 2012-01-01 2:59 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
I'm in the processes of running our first dsync backup of all users
(from maildir to mdbox on remote server), and one problem I'm hitting
that dsync will work fine on first run for some users, and then
reliably fail whenever I try a new run:
Hi everyone,
Was just perusing this article about how trivial it is to decrypt
passwords that are stored using most (standard) encryption methods (like
MD5), and was wondering - is it possible to use bcrypt with
dovecot+postfix+mysql (or posgres)?
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2012-01-03 3:40 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Hi everyone,
Was just perusing this article about how trivial it is to decrypt
passwords that are stored using most (standard) encryption methods (like
MD5), and was wondering - is it possible to use bcrypt with
dovecot+postfix+mysql (or posgres
On 2012-01-03 4:03 PM, David Ford wrote:
md5 is deprecated, *nix has used sha1 for a while now
That link lumps sha1 in with MD5 and others:
"Why Not {MD5, SHA1, SHA256, SHA512, SHA-3, etc}?"
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2012-01-03 5:10 PM, WJCarpenter wrote:
In his description, he uses the example of passwords which are
"lowercase, alphanumeric, and 6 characters long" (and in another place
the example is "lowercase, alphabetic passwords which are ≤7
characters", I guess to illustrate that things have gotten
On 2012-01-03 6:12 PM, WJCarpenter wrote:
On 1/3/2012 2:38 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
http://xkcd.com/936/
As they saying goes, entropy ain't what it used to be.
https://www.grc.com/haystack.htm
However, both links actually illustrate the same point: once you get
past dictionary attacks, the
On 2012-01-03 8:37 PM, David Ford wrote:
part of my point along that of brute force resistance, is that
when security becomes onerous to the typical user such as requiring
non-repeat passwords of "10 characters including punctuation and mixed
case", even stalwart policy followers start tending t
On 2012-01-03 8:58 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 01/03/2012 08:25 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
What I'm worried about is the worst case scenario of someone getting
ahold of the entire user database of *stored* passwords, where they can
then take their time and brute force them at their le
On 2012-01-04 8:19 PM, Pascal Volk
wrote:
On 01/03/2012 09:40 PM Charles Marcus wrote:
Hi everyone,
Was just perusing this article about how trivial it is to decrypt
passwords that are stored using most (standard) encryption methods (like
MD5), and was wondering - is it possible to use bcrypt
On 2012-01-05 10:28 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 01/05/12 06:26, Charles Marcus wrote:
To prevent rainbow table attacks, salt your passwords. You can make them
a little bit more difficult in plenty of ways, but salt is the
/solution/.
Go read that link (you obviously didn't yet, be
On 2012-01-05 11:21 AM, Willie Gillespie wrote:
If the phone knows the password and I have the phone, then I have the
password. Similarly, if I compromise the workstation that knows the
password, then I also have the password.
Interesting... I thought they were stored encrypted. I definitely u
On 2012-01-05 11:31 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Ugh, sorry. I went to the link that someone else quoted:
https://www.grc.com/haystack.htm
Gibson*is* a renowned crackpot.
Don't know about that, but I do know from long experience Spinrite rocks!
Maybe
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2012-01-06 5:54 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.1.2012, at 12.09, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I have deduplication active in my first mdbox: type mailbox, but how
do I find out how well the deduplication works? Is there a way of
finding out how much disk space I saved (if I saved some :) )?
You
On 2012-01-06 6:58 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-01-06 5:54 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.1.2012, at 12.09, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I have deduplication active in my first mdbox: type mailbox, but how
do I find out how well the deduplication works? Is there a way of
finding out how much
On 2012-01-09 9:51 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
The "proper" solution for this that I've been thinking about would be
to use v2.1's imapc backend with master users. So that when user A
wants to access user B's shared folder, Dovecot connects to B's IMAP
server using master user login, and accesses t
On 2012-01-11 10:09 AM, foru...@smartmobili.com
wrote:
Le 11.01.2012 15:19, Willie Gillespie a écrit :
On 1/11/2012 7:11 AM, foru...@smartmobili.com wrote:
I was wondering if dovecot allows to log imap communications ?
You could look at Rawlog
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Debugging/Rawlog
http://
On 2012-01-11 1:00 PM, huret deffgok wrote:
Hi list,
This post is slightly OT, I hope no one will take offense.
I was following the wiki on using dovecot LDA with postfix and implemented,
for our future mail server, the address extensions mechanism: an email sent
to "validuser+foldern...@mydoma
On 2012-01-11 2:05 PM, huret deffgok wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-01-11 1:00 PM, huret deffgok wrote:
This post is slightly OT, I hope no one will take offense. I was
following the wiki on using dovecot LDA with postfix and
implemented, for our future
On 2012-01-12 6:10 PM, Maarten Bezemer wrote:
Of course I don't know anything about the details of the project (number
of users, requirements for speed of MWI updates, mail storage type,
etc.) but if it's not a very large setup and mail storage is mbox or
maildir, I'd probably go for cron-based
On 2012-01-12 6:17 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 11.1.2012, at 20.53, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
So now the hard part is writing the piece that I can't just crib from
elsewhere -- making sure that I hook every place in Dovecot that the
user's voicemail folder can be changed in a way that would cha
On 2012-01-13 12:11 PM, IVO GELOV (CRM) wrote:
I am aware of the various autoresponder scripts for vacation autoreplies
(I am using Virtual Vacation 3.1 by Mischa Peters).
I have an issue with auto-replies - it is vulnerable to spamming with
forged email address.
I think you are using an extre
On 2012-01-14 12:23 PM, IVO GELOV (CRM) wrote:
I have downloaded the latest version 4.0 - but it seems there is no
way to prevent spammers to use forged email addresses. I decided to
remove the vacation feature from our corporate mail server, because
it actually opens a backdoor (even though onl
On 2012-01-14 3:17 PM, Charles Thompson wrote:
Version information :
root@hostname[/etc/rc.d/rc3.d]# dovecot --version ; dovecot -n ; cat
/etc/*release*
0.99.11
0.99 is simply way, way, *way* too old to waste any time helping you.
The short answer is - *upgrade* to a more recent version (at
On 2012-01-15 7:33 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
check_sender_access ${hash}/nospoof,
Oh - if you aren't using variables for the maps paths, just use:
check_sender_access hash:/path/to/map/nospoof,
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2012-01-15 7:50 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-01-15 7:33 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
check_sender_access ${hash}/nospoof,
Oh - if you aren't using variables for the maps paths, just use:
check_sender_access hash:/path/to/map/nospoof,
One last thing - this obviously requires o
On 2012-01-15 12:03 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-01-15 7:50 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-01-15 7:33 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
check_sender_access ${hash}/nospoof,
Oh - if you aren't using variables for the maps paths, just use:
check_sender_access hash:/path/to/map/no
On 2012-01-15 4:50 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
I don't see how this will help. The scenario the OP is concerned about
isspammer@foreign.domain sends a message with forged From: and maybe
envelope sendervictim@other.foreign.domain to his user on vacation.
Guess I should read more carefully... for
On 2012-01-16 4:15 AM, Peter Hessler wrote:
I'm looking through my configuration, and I cannot see a limit on how
many times a single user can connect. He is connecting from different
IPs.
I think you're needing:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Services#Service_limits
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2012-01-17 9:58 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Using -a shows you all settings, as they're running in your
installation. That's the defaults, except where they're overwritten by
your config.
I was asking for the defaults regardless of what's in my config file, so
that I don't have to deduce the
On 2012-01-23 9:41 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
On 2012-01-23 14:38, Amira Othman wrote:
And there is no way to receive incoming emails not on port 25 ?
No.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Mail_Transfer_Protocol
Well, not precisely correct...
You *could* use a router that does port transl
On 2012-01-23 11:14 AM, Noel wrote:
If your problem is that your Internet Service Provider is blocking
port 25, you can contact them. Some ISPs will unblock port 25 on
request, or might even have an online form you can fill out.
The OP specifically said that *he* had changed the port from 25
On 2012-01-24 6:51 AM, Jacek Osiecki wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-01-23 11:14 AM, Noel wrote:
If your problem is that your Internet Service Provider is blocking
port 25, you can contact them. Some ISPs will unblock port 25 on
request, or might even have an online
On 2012-01-24 7:51 AM, Amira Othman wrote:
Thanks for reply
The problem that ISP for some reason port 25 is not stable and refuse
connection for several times so I tried to change port to 587 instead
of 25 to keep sending emails. And I though that I can stop using port
25 as it's not always wor
On 2012-01-24 8:39 AM, Noel wrote:
On 1/24/2012 5:23 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
The OP specifically said that *he* had changed the port from 25 to
587...
... because port 25 didn't work.
For *sending*...
And his complaint was that changing the port for the main smtpd process
cause
On 2012-01-25 8:34 AM, Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Dovecot should already have such cache. If there are problems with that, I
think it would be better to fix it on Dovecot's side rather than adding a
second cache.
Very true. Has there b
On 2012-01-25 3:19 AM, Arun Gupta wrote:
I am using dovecot 2.0.16, and assigend globally procmailrc
(/etc/procmailrc) which delivers mails to user's home directory in
maildir formate. Also I assined quota to User through setquota (edquota)
command, If the quota excedded then this case user's ma
On 2012-01-25 8:40 PM, Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote:
I'd just like to confirm that there is no risk to the actual mail data is
ever something is badly configured when I start dovecot 2.1. I am managing
this old server on my spare time for a friend, so I don't want to loose
2million+ emails and ha
On 2012-01-25 11:31 PM, Gedalya wrote:
This leaves me with the option of reading the mailboxes using IMAP.
There are tools like offlineimap or mbsync,
Not familiar with those, but I think imapsync will do what you want?
http://imapsync.lamiral.info/
I do see that it references those two thou
On 2012-01-26 8:11 AM, Gedalya wrote:
As I understand, there is no way an IMAP-to-IAMP process can preserve
UIDs, since new UIDs are assigned for every message by the target server.
Also, imapsync found 0 messages in all mailboxes on my evil
to-be-eliminated server, something I didn't bother tro
On 2012-01-28 3:24 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 17.1.2012, at 16.23, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
First of all, feature request:
doveconf -d
show the default value of all settings
Done: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/41cb0217b7c3
Awesome, thanks Timo!
This makes it much easier to
On 2012-02-03 9:38 AM, Przemek Orzechowski wrote:
is there a method to actually prohibit users close to quota to send
emails? Ie defining dovecot as authentication agent?
I wrote about a feature request on this list for something that would
probably easily provide the ability for dovecot to do
On 2012-02-06 3:10 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 4.2.2012, at 15.09, Charles Marcus wrote:
This way, you could completely disable the 'Save a copy of Sent
Messages to X folder' option in all mail clients like you can wit
GMail accounts.
Can't you already do this by configu
On 2012-02-11 1:46 PM, Gustavo wrote:
Ok, I study the wikki and the dovecot works. But when I try to send a mail
using squirrel, I get this error on logs:
Feb 11 18:41:55 jubileu postfix/smtpd[19522]: connect from
localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
Feb 11 18:41:55 jubileu postfix/smtpd[19522]: wa
On 2012-02-12 12:42 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Next up: Creating dovecot-2.2 tree with great new features.:)
Can't wait to read your follow-up email outlining these 'great new
features' you expect to make it into 2.2...
Thanks so much for dovecot Timo! I am amazed at how far it has come in
t
1 - 100 of 2127 matches
Mail list logo
