On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 03:46 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
> But any comments on which one is better:
>
> a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
>
> b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable
Jonathan wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> MySQL gets around the problem of multiple masters allocating the
> same primary key, by giving each server its own address range
> (e.g. first machine uses 1,5,9,13 next one uses 2,6,10,14,...).
> Would this work for UIDs?
UIDs have to be sequential. Causes some probl
> Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> Hi,
> I have written a plugin so that each time a message is added to a
> specific box, a program is run and the message is piped into it. Note
> that the message is also really added to the box.
> I've been using it for nearly 3 month, for spam/ham learning, and have
>
>
> Please don't. One reason Dovecot is so easy to get up and running
> quickly is that it has minimal dependencies. For those of us who
> aren't running Linux on PCs that can become a headache very quickly,
> as the authors of many of the depended-upon libraries often get
> "creative" with nonpor
