On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 03:46 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers. > But any comments on which one is better: > > a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.YYYYMMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable) > > b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable) > > With a) style the releases could be done by simply copying a nightly > snapshot to releases/ directory and announcing the changes since the > last release. I'm not sure if that's good or bad.
For the sake of packagers, stick with numbers, always incrementing. Makes our lives a ton easier.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
