Op 8-2-2017 om 21:07 schreef Jan Vonde:
Am 07.02.2017 um 12:29 schrieb Stephan Bosch:
Op 31-1-2017 om 6:33 schreef Jan Vonde:
Am 31.01.2017 um 00:04 schrieb Stephan Bosch:
Op 1/22/2017 om 12:01 PM schreef Stephan Bosch:
Op 1/22/2017 om 10:01 AM schreef Jan Vonde:
I tried adding the follow
Op 19-1-2017 om 10:43 schreef Thomas Leuxner:
* Stephan Bosch 2017.01.19 10:32:
Could you provide a more detailed example?
Sure. Personal script v
/var/vmail/domains/leuxner.net/tlx/.dovecot.sieve:
require ["include","copy","fileinto","imap4flags","vacation"];
include :global "global";
-
Hi,
I have copied accross a known-good sieve file from a working server and
its not filtering. Everything just gets chucked into INBOX.
doveconf-n at the bottom of this mail
Feb 17 16:05:20 server postfix/smtpd[51562]: 7FA5E12CBBC:
client=unknown[192.168.167.57]
Feb 17 16:05:23 server post
Am 17.02.2017 um 11:45 schrieb Stephan Bosch:
Op 8-2-2017 om 21:07 schreef Jan Vonde:
Am 07.02.2017 um 12:29 schrieb Stephan Bosch:
Op 31-1-2017 om 6:33 schreef Jan Vonde:
Am 31.01.2017 um 00:04 schrieb Stephan Bosch:
Op 1/22/2017 om 12:01 PM schreef Stephan Bosch:
Op 1/22/2017 om 10:01 AM s
Hello Folks,
my StartCom SSL-Certificate expires soon and so I wanted to switch to
Let's Encrypt Certificates instead. Unfortunatelly Thunderbird seems not
to like it, although all -tested- other Clients work without any problems.
When I connect with Thunderbird it sends an "Encrypted Alert" dire
On 2/17/17 8:58 AM, Bastian Sebode wrote:
> I uploaded two Wireshark tracefiles, further logs and dovecot -n
Looking at your dovecot -n, you're using two different files here:
ssl_cert = http://www.tigertech.net/
Hi Dovecot Users,
I’ve configured dovecot dsync replication and I see troubles in the logs and
get user complaints which I can’t explain. I found similar threads on this
mailinglist, but I couldn’t find a solution anywhere. Does anybody have dsync
running without problems on a high volume mail
Hey Robert,
thanks for your reply.
Am 17.02.2017 um 19:28 schrieb Robert L Mathews:
> Looking at your dovecot -n, you're using two different files here:
>
> ssl_cert = ssl_key =
> Are you sure these two files match, and contain the right things in the
> right order?
>
Yes, unfortunately I'm
On 2017.02.17. 22:31, Bastian Sebode wrote:
Hey Robert,
thanks for your reply.
Am 17.02.2017 um 19:28 schrieb Robert L Mathews:
Looking at your dovecot -n, you're using two different files here:
ssl_cert =
Are You sure, chain.pem contains your cert + immediate? By default
certbot in chain.
Usually with LE, the filename is fullchain.pem, not chain.pem.
Can you please doublecheck this?
Also, try
openssl s_client -connect hostname:143 -starttls imap
Aki
> On February 17, 2017 at 10:31 PM Bastian Sebode
> wrote:
>
>
> Hey Robert,
>
> thanks for your reply.
>
> Am 17.02.2017 um
Seems wrong to me too, Robert. If you put your private key inside your
certificate, won't it be sent to the client along with it ?
Bastian, are you using an old version of thunderbird ? googling for "SSL alert
number 42" gave me two results indicating a bug in thunderbird versions 31,32
and 33.
On 2017-02-17 22:38, chaouche yacine wrote:
Seems wrong to me too, Robert. If you put your private key inside your
certificate, won't it be sent to the client along with it ?
This is one way of supplying cert + key to a daemon and no, the key is
not sent to the client.
While it is normaly true
Hey.
Thanks again for your help. I took the "dovecot -n" while the StartSSL
Certificate was active, so the chain.pem was correct.
Finally I found the issue! :-) But I still have no idea why the problem
happens with Thunderbird.
I used dehydrated to fetch the certificates from Let's Encrypt and a
On 2/17/2017 2:38 PM, chaouche yacine wrote:
> Seems wrong to me too, Robert. If you put your private key inside your
> certificate, won't it be sent to the client along with it ?
The private key should not be sent to the connecting client, even if it
is contained in the same place as the certifi
> On 17 February 2017, at 08:24, Ben wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have copied accross a known-good sieve file from a working server and its
> not filtering. Everything just gets chucked into INBOX.
What I did when encountering a similar issue was to take one of the messages
from INBOX that should h
Interesting. Is there any particular benefit in having only one file for both
certificate and private key ? I find that putting private key in a separate
file feels more secure.
Bastian, how could two identical certificates be processed differently by
Thunderbid ? how did you check the differe
16 matches
Mail list logo