On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 11:32 -0700, Robin wrote:
> Indeed. What I have seen is a create deal of variation in the
> configuration (/etc/login.defs or your distro's equivalent) in terms of
> making use of such things.
>
> I don't see any added value to bcrypt over iterated SHA-512, really, and
On 2012-07-15 6:22 PM, n...@5sg.eu wrote:
maybe - just as in article below
http://www.bishnet.net/tim/blog/tag/maildir-to-mbox/
you like archive in such format
I'm trying to switch dovecot to MBox, not just make archives.
BTW: I use http://yergler.net/projects/one-off/maildir-to-mbox as
it's
On 2012-07-15 6:24 PM, Sean Kamath wrote:
On Jul 15, 2012, at 4:34 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-07-15 4:50 AM, Sean Kamath wrote:
Before I dive in and upgrade everything, am I missing something
simple?
dovecot -n output maybe
Certainly (wasn't on the list of "things to put in a po
On 2012-07-16 2:45 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
i have running touch with 3000 users, i dont see much overhead, anyway
its true ,its not very elegant, perhaps i.e you may write some daily
cron bash find script looking about latest timestamp of files in .new
with maildir
which of cource is not th
Am 16.07.2012 12:48, schrieb Charles Marcus:
> On 2012-07-16 2:45 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> i have running touch with 3000 users, i dont see much overhead, anyway
>> its true ,its not very elegant, perhaps i.e you may write some daily
>> cron bash find script looking about latest timestamp o
Hi!
I'm just installing ACL support on 2.1.6.
When a user changes these ACLs, this results in a full table scan on
the dictionary, that tells dovecot who shares with whom.
Here's what queries I see when I run
$ doveadm acl delete -u user1 shared/user2/folder user=user1
1: SELECT dummy,to_user,
In reading the Dovecot NFS WIKI entry:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/NFS
It mentions a FreeBSD NFS client caching bug. I believe that bug only exists
pre-8.x ? It seems that a patch in the PR notes was MFC'd and made it into 8.x
at some point. (at least I checked the source in 8.3 and it was ther
Am 16.07.2012 14:58, schrieb Robert Blayzor:
> In reading the Dovecot NFS WIKI entry:
>
> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/NFS
>
> It mentions a FreeBSD NFS client caching bug. I believe that bug only exists
> pre-8.x ? It seems that a patch in the PR notes was MFC'd and made it into
> 8.x at some po
Hi Aall,
we are having issues with outlook clients, running exchange or lotus
being unable to parse the email messages redirected by
dovecot's sieve 0.3.1, the command is plain redirect "em...@lotusmail.xxx";
redirects from mta also work correctly
exchange was fixed by removing this commit
http
On Jul 16, 2012, at 9:15 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> There where hot disputs relating such setups, read list archive
>
> i guess nfs is simply not the ideal solution, however its used in real
> existing setups, also maildir may not ideal
>
> for good advice there should be more info about how
2012/7/16 Lazy :
> Hi Aall,
>
> we are having issues with outlook clients, running exchange or lotus
> being unable to parse the email messages redirected by
>
> dovecot's sieve 0.3.1, the command is plain redirect "em...@lotusmail.xxx";
> redirects from mta also work correctly
>
>
> exchange was f
On 7/16/2012 5:00 PM, Lazy wrote:
2012/7/16 Lazy :
i have got it
if ( recipient != NULL )
rfc2822_header_field_write(f,
"X-Sieve-Redirected-From", recipient);
was adding crlf in the headers, and it made whole email inconsistent
(when I have removed crlf filter before)
> The only issue I see right now is Dovecot index file write bashing
> if a user accesses their mailbox from multiple locations at the same
> time, and I gave that example in the previous post. That seems to
> be more and more common these days but still not the norm for 80%+
> of the mailboxes we
Am 16.07.2012 16:19, schrieb Robert Blayzor:
>
> We're talking about tens of thousands of mailboxes and at least half a dozen
> servers involved. There is quite a bit of traffic. We've been running
> Maildir via NFS with another mailserver product for some time, and it's been
> ok as far as
On 2012-07-16 10:19 AM, Robert Blayzor wrote:
The only issue I see right now is Dovecot index file write bashing if a user
accesses their mailbox from multiple locations at the same time, and I gave
that example in the previous post. That seems to be more and more common these
days but still
On Jul 16, 2012, at 8:58 AM, Robert Blayzor wrote:
> In reading the Dovecot NFS WIKI entry:
>
> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/NFS
>
> It mentions a FreeBSD NFS client caching bug. I believe that bug only exists
> pre-8.x ? It seems that a patch in the PR notes was MFC'd and made it into
> 8.x at
On Jul 16, 2012, at 11:34 AM, David Warden wrote:
> I can't speak to FreeBSD but we have had no problems using the NetApp NFS
> lock manager (lock_method = fcntl) instead of dotlock. Previously we were
> using dotlock and any skew in clocks on the Dovecot servers would cause
> higher CPU usage a
On 16/07/2012 11:05, Noel Butler wrote:
On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 11:32 -0700, Robin wrote:
Indeed. What I have seen is a create deal of variation in the
configuration (/etc/login.defs or your distro's equivalent) in terms of
making use of such things.
I don't see any added value to bcrypt over
On 16/07/2012 12:01, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 16.07.2012 12:48, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2012-07-16 2:45 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
i have running touch with 3000 users, i dont see much overhead, anyway
its true ,its not very elegant, perhaps i.e you may write some daily
cron bash find
Hey all. I'm running Mac OS X 10.6.4, and had Dovecot 2.0.7 installed built
from source. I'm now wanting to upgrade to Dovecot 2.1.8, but I can't get MAKE
to finish without errors:
./configure --with-mysql
(snip)
Install prefix . : /usr/local
File offsets ... : 64bit
I/O polling : kqueu
We have the requirement to provide SSL on some IP addresses, but not others on
our servers.
Providing SSL is the easy part and we're able to use multiple SSL certificates
now. (thanks Timo!)
All is working ok, but we several IP hosts that do not require SSL and do not
have valid certificates.
I just did tried building Dovecot 2.1.0, same issue. Dovecot 2.0.21 was able
to build without issues, so this problem seems to be with the entire 2.1.x
branch.
Jim
On Jul 16, 2012, at 4:25 PM, Jim wrote:
> Hey all. I'm running Mac OS X 10.6.4, and had Dovecot 2.0.7 installed built
> from s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Wojciech,
On 07/16/12 08:20, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> I would like to do incremental backups of the users' maildir directories to
>> a dedicated backup host (using "rsync -SHa" and rsnapshot).
>
> dont use it.
>
> use rsync -b option. It is MUC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Robert,
On 07/16/12 08:46, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
> dsync backup ,may the better the solution in your case
>
I will surely try. This looks very promising.
Many thanx
Harri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
24 matches
Mail list logo
