Isn't \* supposed to be (almost always) in flags after "SELECT" command in
dovecot imap?
Isn't \* meaning is "you can store any new flag" ?
20 select INBOX
* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft)] Flags
permitted.
so
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 16:02 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> looking about last patches ( dict quota quota code )
>> imap copy delete etc works nice again by disabling imap quota
>> so you may have a look about your last quota dict patches
>
> Should be fixed now.
>
Hi
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 09:28:27PM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 11:11 +0100, Ulrich Zehl wrote:
> > Our setup has multiple servers sharing the same NFS-mounted directory for
> > maildirs and indexes; we have set
> > mmap_disable = yes
> > dotlock_use_excl = yes
> > fsyn
Robert Schetterer schrieb:
> Timo Sirainen schrieb:
>> On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 16:02 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>> looking about last patches ( dict quota quota code )
>>> imap copy delete etc works nice again by disabling imap quota
>>> so you may have a look about your last quota dict patches
The best place to filter spam is at the first receiving MTA, (qmail in
this case), not the IMAP/POP3 server.
--
Bryan Bradsby
Postmaster
512.936.2248
Texas State Government Network
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 08:58 +0330, Sophia Alikhani wrote:
> I used dovecot-1.1.7 + qmail-jms1-7+ vpopmail + ...
Bryan Bradsby wrote:
The best place to filter spam is at the first receiving MTA, (qmail in
this case), not the IMAP/POP3 server.
Probably John Simpson, the author of the qmail patch you're using, can
give you some hints on how to tweak your qmail install.
Regards,
Hugo Monteiro.
--
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 14:29 +0100, Ulrich Zehl wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 09:28:27PM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 11:11 +0100, Ulrich Zehl wrote:
> > > Our setup has multiple servers sharing the same NFS-mounted directory for
> > > maildirs and indexes; we have set
>
Hello Jack
Setting up imapproxy on a third machine greatly improve
performances on my mailhub which doesn't refuse connexions
anymore.
Thanks a lot for your help !
Frank
Jack Stewart wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 16:25 +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 08:47 -0600, David Favor wrote:
Jan 24 06:34:29 net1 dovecot: uid specified multiple times for
david-x...@coolsurf.com
Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/943339025578
And a related fix: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/69901064e657
In reviewing the differences between 1.1.8 and 1.1.9 I saw a probable
bug in the new function uint_cmp() in src/lib-storage/index/maildir/
maildir-sync-index.c:
if (*i1 < *i2)
return -1;
else if (*i1 > *i2)
return -1;
else
Hello Dovecot users,
Because there was a crash bug in the ManageSieve v0.10.4 login daemon, I
made a new release of the ManageSieve service for Dovecot v1.1. This
release includes two other small fixes as well.
Changelog v0.10.5:
- Fixed a segfault bug in the authentication time-out. Bug r
Hi,
Michael Lechtermann schrieb:
>> There is a 1.1.9 release candidate available which contains fixes for
>> Berkeley DB. Maybe this solves your issues.
>>
>> http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.1.9.rc.tar.gz
>>
>> Changes since v1.1.8:
>> ...
>> - Berkeley DB memory/resource leak fixes.
>>
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 11:53 -0600, Mike Abbott wrote:
> In reviewing the differences between 1.1.8 and 1.1.9 I saw a probable
> bug in the new function uint_cmp() in src/lib-storage/index/maildir/
> maildir-sync-index.c:
> if (*i1 < *i2)
> return -1;
> else if
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 15:35 -0500, Charles Gregory wrote:
The dovecot.index.log isn't modified unless something has actually
changed.
Which I am hoping is a true statement if someone reads mail. (In this
case, things like 'new status' indicators and su
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 15:41 -0500, Charles Gregory wrote:
> which still leaves me trying to figure the best method of determining
> when a user has been *reading* the mailbox. I would really rather NOT
> be reading through mail logs to find a login
How about: http://wiki.dovecot.org/
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 15:41 -0500, Charles Gregory wrote:
which still leaves me trying to figure the best method of determining
when a user has been *reading* the mailbox.
How about: http://wiki.dovecot.org/PostLoginScripting
This does the tr
Hi all,
ok, after looking at all of the posts that I've found, and trying
numerous settings, I am a little stumped as to how to set up the deliver
program with qmail to get everything correct.
Ultimately, I really don't want to do a lookup of the home dir if I
don't have to. I'd rather specify th
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.10.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.10.tar.gz.sig
v1.1.9 wasn't such a great release. Once again: Would be great if
someone started a proper testing suite so releases could be tested..
- Maildir: Keyword handling was somewhat b
Hi Timo
is this possible a possible setup ?
for downloading imap folders ( including inbox )
with pop3 controlled by a a dovecot-virtual file
in usr/local/virtual/%d/%u/
with content something like that
*
-Trash
-Trash/*
-Sent
-Sent/*
-Drafts
-Drafts/*
all
namespace private {
separator = /
p
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.10.tar.gz
> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.10.tar.gz.sig
>
> v1.1.9 wasn't such a great release. Once again: Would be great if
> someone started a proper testing suite so releases could be tested..
what you mean wit
On Jan 26, 2009, at 7:45 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
is this possible a possible setup ?
for downloading imap folders ( including inbox )
with pop3 controlled by a a dovecot-virtual file
in usr/local/virtual/%d/%u/
Place that in to e.g.: /etc/dovecot/virtual/INBOX
namespace private {
prefi
On Jan 26, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
v1.1.9 wasn't such a great release. Once again: Would be great if
someone started a proper testing suite so releases could be tested..
what you mean with testing suite exactly ?
some code stuff or a bunch of differe
What ideas do people have on a good going forward framework/matrix?
Caltech, which largely translate to myself, will be going through a
validation process before we upgrade. After reading the dovecot and some
other wikis, I realize I can do better. It would be nice to be more general.
We are
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.10.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.10.tar.gz.sig
v1.1.9 wasn't such a great release.
I refreshed the ManageSieve patch for v1.1:
http://www.rename-it.nl/dovecot/1.1/dovecot-1.1.10-managesieve-0.10.5.diff.gz
h
Dear all,
Thank you very much for your time and your big help.
I really appreciated all of you.
Best Regards,
Masaharu Kawada
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 15:17 +0900, Masaharu Kawada wrote:
Any idea what Dovecot version? rhel4 had 1.0.rc15 I think? I know there
were some
On Jan 26, 2009, at 6:32 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.10.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.10.tar.gz.sig
Timo:
Did you get around to modifying deliver wherein the '-e' has become
default behavior... per the earlier discussion?
B. B
On Jan 26, 2009, at 10:36 PM, Bruce Bodger wrote:
On Jan 26, 2009, at 6:32 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.10.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.10.tar.gz.sig
Timo:
Did you get around to modifying deliver wherein the '-e' has become
de
Hi
I installed qmail-jms1-7.07 + domainkey-patch + simscan + clamav+
dovecot-1.1.7+ vpopmail+ spamassassin
I also used Bayes + AWL as database connection in local.cf
I don't know how can i stop these type of spam at MTA level (qmail) i
wrote a rule in .dovecot.sieve
if header :contains ["From","To"
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:02:19AM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Perhaps the NFS cache flushing doesn't work then for some reason. What
> OS (kernel) are you using on the Dovecot servers? How big values have
> you set to attribute cache?
On the client side, it's Linux 2.6.23.16. All attribute cach
29 matches
Mail list logo
