Azher Amin, on 6/28/2007 1:22 AM, said the following:
Hi Timo,
Thnx one of the error is gone due to duplicate passdbs, thnx. However
following error is persistant. I restarted my sendmail, dovecot etc.
changed the group permission as you mentioned.
You never provided requested information...
Charles Marcus wrote:
Azher Amin, on 6/28/2007 1:22 AM, said the following:
Hi Timo,
Thnx one of the error is gone due to duplicate passdbs, thnx. However
following error is persistant. I restarted my sendmail, dovecot etc.
changed the group permission as you mentioned.
You never provide
On 28.6.2007, at 5.12, Mark Edwards wrote:
Unless I specifically have /var/mail/virtual returned as home in
the ldap lookup, deliver can't find the directory. In other words,
it doesn't seem to respect the above mail_location setting. In
addition, if I don't have a pre-existing maildir in
On 28.6.2007, at 8.22, Azher Amin wrote:
Jun 28 10:19:47 webmail sm-mta[19653]: l5S5Jl1Z019649: Warning:
program /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver unsafe: Group writable
directory
This error comes from sendmail. If dovecot directory isn't group
writable, then I don't really have any idea
Tony Tsang a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I have some machines running FreeBSD and dovecot deployed. User's home
> dir is on NFS mount and I've found that dovecot only works with
> dotlock file locking mechanism, fcntl and flock failed. Now it causes
> problem with thunderbird (thunderbird is cachine c
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 15:18 +0200, Geoffroy Desvernay wrote:
>
> Tony Tsang a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have some machines running FreeBSD and dovecot deployed. User's home
> > dir is on NFS mount and I've found that dovecot only works with
> > dotlock file locking mechanism, fcntl and flock
Hello friends!
Is it possible to make deliver delivery a message without making a lookup
using virtual users?
I've read the section "Without a Lookup" (http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA) in
the wiki but I can´t do the same thing in my config and I can´t figure this
out. From the forum I found this th
Hi Timo,
Following is the directory output, plz suggest.
webmail:~# ls -la /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/
total 9724
drwxr-sr-x 2 root staff4096 2007-06-26 18:23 .
drwxr-sr-x 3 root staff4096 2007-06-26 17:56 ..
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root staff 144247 2007-06-26 18:23 checkpassword-reply
-rwx--
On Jun 28, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.6.2007, at 5.12, Mark Edwards wrote:
Unless I specifically have /var/mail/virtual returned as home in
the ldap lookup, deliver can't find the directory. In other
words, it doesn't seem to respect the above mail_location
setting. In
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 08:17 -0700, Mark Edwards wrote:
> >> Jun 27 18:56:52 mini deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): auth input:
> >> mail=mark
> >
> > You're overriding it with "mark".
>
> I see. Well, my aim is to avoid having to prefix my mailbox entries
> in my LDAP database with "maildir:", and
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 11:11 -0300, Bruno Puga wrote:
> HOME=/path/to/user/homedir deliver -f [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I receive the
> message: Fatal: destination user parameter (-d user) not given
If you're going to run deliver without -d, you must not be running it as
root.
signature.asc
Des
Though there are conversion scripts, I'd like to give the convert
plugin a chance. I have Dovecot 1.0.1 on Trustix Secure Linux 2.2
(Linux 2.4.27), and we had UW IMAP 2002e. Dovecot seems to work OK
(e.g. I can add copy messages to it), but things break when I activate
the convert plugin.
The
On Jun 28, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
My dovecot-ldap.conf contains:
user_attrs = homeDirectory=home,mailbox=mail
I'm setting mailbox=mail because otherwise dovecot uses postfix's
destination, which is the entire destination email address. Are my
only choices to either use postfix'
It seems as if the flock does not have any effect on the corrupting of the
transaction logs. Additionally, I would not be prepared to use dotlock as
its performance is detrimental to the server's load at busy times.
Ronald.
On 27/06/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, ext3 would b
FWIW, the Dovecot 1.0.1 convert plugin works with all my UW-IMAP
mboxes moved to ~/mail. At least that shows that my system otherwise
works. Also, I wrote a script to move the mboxes and preserve the
IMAP subscriptions. (I hope the list accepts the attached script.)
move_mail.sh
Description:
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 10:31 -0700, Mark Edwards wrote:
> One thing that confused me is that setting the home attribute in
> userdb doesn't override mail_location, and in fact doesn't seem to
> have any affect unless the mail attribute is set.
Home directory is used wherever you have ~/ or %h.
Hello,
I have a mail server which I upgraded yesterday.
OLD:
Redhat 9
sendmail (very old version)
UW ipop3d
usermin with readmail module for webmail access (very old version)
NEW:
Fedora Core 6
sendmail 8.13.8
Usermin for webmail again
dovecot 1.0.0
# /etc/dovecot.conf
protocols: pop3
logi
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:43 -0700, Andy Fadich wrote:
> Everything is working great, besides a few glitches here and there. However,
> When accessing mailboxes via webmail (usermin) an email shows up with a
> subject of DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA.
Do these messages have X-IM
On Jun 28, 2007, at 12:38 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Home directory is used wherever you have ~/ or %h. Or in your case
because you tried to use a relative mail_location path and Dovecot
chdired to home dir.
So, is it correct
that mail_location is the rule, unless mail is set in user_attrs, in
w
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:52 -0700, Mark Edwards wrote:
> One thing that still puzzles me is why userdb has to be set at all.
> In my case its totally unnecessary as far as I can tell, yet I get
> errors if I don't set it or set it to nothing. I have it set to
> return the home attribute rig
The message does have the X-IMAP Header intact.(X-IMAP: 1183060687
02) The email is hidden when using a pop3 client(doesn't download
it), or telnetting an account and using the LIST command.The problem I
am having is that within webmail (read mail module of usermin) it doesn't
hide the
On Jun 28, 2007, at 1:01 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:52 -0700, Mark Edwards wrote:
One thing that still puzzles me is why userdb has to be set at all.
In my case its totally unnecessary as far as I can tell, yet I get
errors if I don't set it or set it to nothing. I have
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 23:12 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 28.6.2007, at 23.10, Mark Edwards wrote:
>
> >> For v1.1 I'll add new global mail_uid and mail_gid settings. Then
> >> if you
> >> use them userdb won't be needed.
> >
> > I am using user_global_uid and user_global_gid, and so there is
On 28.6.2007, at 23.10, Mark Edwards wrote:
For v1.1 I'll add new global mail_uid and mail_gid settings. Then
if you
use them userdb won't be needed.
I am using user_global_uid and user_global_gid, and so there is no
reason for userdb to return uid and gid ini my case, in fact I have
it
On 28.6.2007, at 23.05, Andy Fadich wrote:
The message does have the X-IMAP Header intact.(X-IMAP: 1183060687
02) The email is hidden when using a pop3 client(doesn't
download
it), or telnetting an account and using the LIST command.The
problem I
am having is that within webmail
On Jun 28, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.6.2007, at 23.10, Mark Edwards wrote:
For v1.1 I'll add new global mail_uid and mail_gid settings. Then
if you
use them userdb won't be needed.
I am using user_global_uid and user_global_gid, and so there is no
reason for userdb to
What do you mean "The same happens with UW-IMAP/POP3" Do you mean that
internal data message is standard with both dovecot and ipop3d?
Ill go look for some answers on webmins website also. Thanks for the help.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 15:27 -0700, Andy Fadich wrote:
> What do you mean "The same happens with UW-IMAP/POP3" Do you mean that
> internal data message is standard with both dovecot and ipop3d?
Yes.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Andy Fadich spake the following on 6/28/2007 3:27 PM:
> What do you mean "The same happens with UW-IMAP/POP3" Do you mean that
> internal data message is standard with both dovecot and ipop3d?
>
> Ill go look for some answers on webmins website also. Thanks for the help.
>
> Andy
That is definit
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 15:49 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
> Andy Fadich spake the following on 6/28/2007 3:27 PM:
> > What do you mean "The same happens with UW-IMAP/POP3" Do you mean that
> > internal data message is standard with both dovecot and ipop3d?
> >
> > Ill go look for some answers on webm
I have a client that I have installed Dovecot 1.0.1 for is having
some performance issues. Especially when using IMAP from various
Outlook clients. I have TLS installed and all the IMAP connections
are secured.
I'm wondering is anyone has any recommendations for monitoring
dovecot perfo
31 matches
Mail list logo
