On 2007-06-14, 21:53, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 15:33 +0200, Erland Nylend wrote:
> > On 2007-06-13, 14:29, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > If not, I'd have to create some debug patches to find out which function
> > > is doing this.
> >
> > I would appreciate that very much. I still
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 09:42:27PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Actually increasing the count doesn't work. At least not for me on
It works for me :
count = 5
dovecot-auth 73019 0.0 0.1 5164 4052 ?? SWed07PM 0:11.47
dovecot-auth
dovecot-auth 73020 0.0 0.1 3356 2244 ?? S
Mark Richards wrote:
Phillip T. George wrote:
Correct. If I choose not to save the password, close Outlook, and
open it back up ... I can see the favorite folders links for the IMAP
subfolders. After I put my password in, they disappear.
Did you try the "subscription" process to the folder?
Hi there,
i'm looking for Debian sarge dovecot packages (yes, still running sarge).
Anyone here that has a backported package?
Greetings,
Moritz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.1.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.1.tar.gz.sig
Lots of small fixes.
* deliver: If Return-Path doesn't contain user and domain, don't try
to bounce the mail (this is how it was supposed to work earlier too)
* deliver:
> >>> problem may be? With the previous IMAP server (courier I believe) this
> >>> wasn't a problem...so it leads me to believe that Dovecot might be the
> >>> problem. I'm working with Dovecot 1.0.rc28
There was one security fix and a fix related to listing folders since
then. RC29 made some big
Timo,
Please entertain this elementary question regarding this new feature.
On Jun 15, 2007, at 12:55 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
+ deliver: Added -e parameter to write rejection error to stderr and
exit with EX_NOPERM instead of sending the rejection by executing
sen
Kenny Dail wrote:
problem may be? With the previous IMAP server (courier I believe) this
wasn't a problem...so it leads me to believe that Dovecot might be the
problem. I'm working with Dovecot 1.0.rc28
There was one security fix and a fix related to listing folders since
then. RC
Hello Timo!
I think that to make a ldap_search in the Microsoft Active Directory (I
don't know about OpenLDAP, but it could be the same case) is necessary first
open an connection, after bind with a valid user, and in the same connection
make the search, but with Dovecot we could see in the sniff
Hello all,
I had gone through the wiki, but could not find any page about writing
new plugins. Any pointers towards plugin api/docs will be very
helpful.
with warm regards,
raj
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 00:25 +0530, Rajkumar S wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I had gone through the wiki, but could not find any page about writing
> new plugins. Any pointers towards plugin api/docs will be very
> helpful.
Unfortunately there isn't any plugin documentation currently. What kind
of a plu
OK, I have some more sane thoughts after we discussed our local situation.
See inline comments.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 10:51:02PM -0500, Steven F Siirila wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 06:22:45AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 17:52 -0500, Steven F Siirila wrote:
> > > We
On 6/16/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unfortunately there isn't any plugin documentation currently. What kind
of a plugin do you want to write? Looking at the existing plugins is
probably the easiest way to get started. Also
src/lib-storage/mail-storage.h is the most important API
Phillip T. George wrote:
Kenny Dail wrote:
problem may be? With the previous IMAP server (courier I believe) this
wasn't a problem...so it leads me to believe that Dovecot might be the
problem. I'm working with Dovecot 1.0.rc28
There was one security fix and a fix related to li
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 00:41 +0530, Rajkumar S wrote:
> On 6/16/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Unfortunately there isn't any plugin documentation currently. What kind
> > of a plugin do you want to write? Looking at the existing plugins is
> > probably the easiest way to get starte
On 6/16/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess you mean http://dovecot.org/patches/mail-sql.tar.gz?
Yes.
If you're thinking about making it actually usable, it would be nice to
store the message body instead as MIME parts (with separated
header/body). That would allow identical
Friday 15 of June 2007 22:10:44 Rajkumar S napisał(a):
> Right now I am just experimenting, so do not know how far I will be
> able to work on it. But my idea is to have one db per email address.
> each db will have 3 tables, one table, let me call it header will have
>
> 1. from address
> 2. subje
Friday 15 of June 2007 22:10:44 Rajkumar S napisał(a):
> Second table will have all other headers as well as the message body.
> Third table will have attachments as blobs, along with some metadata
> like content type, file name and so on.
Maybe You could make a checksum of an attachment and use
On 6/16/07, Łukasz Mierzwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to put here id of attachments?
I agree, these are just some idea that came to the top of my mind.
raj
On 6/16/07, Łukasz Mierzwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe You could make a checksum of an attachment and use it as a ID, this way
You could have each unique attachment stored only once in db. What do You
think?
Wonderful idea. I was thinking about the attachment id and identifying
unique att
Friday 15 of June 2007 22:10:44 Rajkumar S napisał(a):
> Right now I am just experimenting, so do not know how far I will be
> able to work on it. But my idea is to have one db per email address.
> each db will have 3 tables, one table, let me call it header will have
To spam this ml more I must s
On 6/16/07, Łukasz Mierzwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To spam this ml more I must say that per user db is not that good idea
I must confess that I got this idea from Zimbra. I was just curious as
to why they went for this instead of the obvious one table for all
users. I will of course run som
Friday 15 of June 2007 22:45:38 Rajkumar S napisał(a):
> On 6/16/07, Łukasz Mierzwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > To spam this ml more I must say that per user db is not that good idea
>
> I must confess that I got this idea from Zimbra. I was just curious as
> to why they went for this instead of
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 02:15 +0530, Rajkumar S wrote:
> On 6/16/07, Łukasz Mierzwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > To spam this ml more I must say that per user db is not that good idea
>
> I must confess that I got this idea from Zimbra. I was just curious as
> to why they went for this instead
On 6/16/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.archiveopteryx.org/schema.html
http://www.archiveopteryx.org/sql-schema.html might be useful reading
too.
Thanks!
raj
On 6/16/07, Łukasz Mierzwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Speed is good, but what about security? You would need to create new db when
creating new user, if userdb is not in mysql than You would need to connect
to it with priviliges to create new db (quite high priviliges I think).
Also I have no ide
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 13:22 -0400, Bruce Bodger wrote:
> Timo,
>
> Please entertain this elementary question regarding this new feature.
>
> On Jun 15, 2007, at 12:55 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > + deliver: Added -e parameter to write rejection error to stderr and
> > exit with EX_NO
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 10:01 +0200, Erland Nylend wrote:
> On 2007-06-14, 21:53, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 15:33 +0200, Erland Nylend wrote:
> > > On 2007-06-13, 14:29, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > > If not, I'd have to create some debug patches to find out which function
> > > >
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 14:14 -0500, Phillip T. George wrote:
>
> Phillip T. George wrote:
> >
> >
> > Kenny Dail wrote:
> >> problem may be? With the previous IMAP server (courier I believe) this
> >> wasn't a problem...so it leads me to believe that Dovecot might be the
> >> problem.
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 14:50 -0300, Bruno Puga wrote:
> Hello Timo!
>
> I think that to make a ldap_search in the Microsoft Active Directory (I
> don't know about OpenLDAP, but it could be the same case) is necessary first
> open an connection, after bind with a valid user, and in the same connecti
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 16:02 +0200, Luigi Rosa wrote:
> I have an installation that sometimes acts strangely:
>
> Jun 12 11:28:00 mail dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=,
> method=PLAIN, rip=10.10.10.103, lip=10.10.10.254
> Jun 12 11:53:59 mail dovecot: IMAP(nadia):
> inotify_add_watch(/var/spool/
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 22:51 -0500, Steven F Siirila wrote:
> > 2) If index files are fully synced, Dovecot writes X-UID: header. It
> > also updates nextuid field in X-IMAP: / X-IMAPbase: header of the first
> > message, which causes Dovecot to read() the file. The nextuid update
> > isn't really r
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 03:25 +0800, Joshua C.S. Chen wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I am planning to upgrade my current uw-imap to dovecot. I am using Linux
> (Redhat EL 4). The main purpose is to use maildir instead of mbox.
> For some reason, I don't want to upgrade all users' mail boxes all at a
>
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 14:16 +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:43:47PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> > it creates a new connection to auth-worker socket.
>
> all the workers and the auth process communicate through a single unix
> socket, doesn
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 14:21 +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:16:55PM +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:43:47PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for your answer.
>
> One more thing : is sending a sighup to the master sufficient for a
> cha
On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 16:01 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> Somehow (I don't know why) in
> dovecot-sieve-1.0.1/src/libsieve/script.c:671
>
> /* first, let's figure out if we should respond to this */
> ret = makehash(hash, a->u.vac.send.addr,
>
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 15:58 +0100, Jasper Slits wrote:
> I made a patch against branch-1.0 for SHA256 password hashing support
> for Dovecot.
I finally got around to committing this.
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/2cba4c0f3b4f
> Changes made by me in Olivier's sha2{.h,.c} code:
> - Prototype
Adding this SHA256 code made me read the BSD license once again. It
says:
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
*notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
*documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
Th
Hi there.
I have just installed DOVECOT 1.0.1 for the first time.
After launching it, I can verify that
ps -ax | grep -i dovecot
1052 ?? Ss 0:00.03 /usr/local/dovecot/sbin/dovecot -c
/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
1053 ?? S 0:00.06 dovecot-auth
1058 p2 R+ 0:00.01 grep -i dovecot
Am Samstag, 16. Juni 2007 schrieb Benton Haynes:
> dovecot: Jun 15 18:51:14 Error: child 1064 (imap) killed with signal 4
As you're getting SIGILL, have you verified that your dovecot (and all
libraries it depends on) has been compiled for the right target CPU?
Greetings,
Gunter
--
*** Powe
40 matches
Mail list logo
