On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 02:15 +0530, Rajkumar S wrote: > On 6/16/07, Łukasz Mierzwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > To spam this ml more I must say that per user db is not that good idea > > I must confess that I got this idea from Zimbra. I was just curious as > to why they went for this instead of the obvious one table for all > users. I will of course run some benchmark and then only choose the > final design.
http://www.archiveopteryx.org/schema.html http://www.archiveopteryx.org/sql-schema.html might be useful reading too.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
