As a journalist, I deal with a lot of PR companies that use constant contact.
For years, I've built up a nice sieve filter that sports these people into my
PR folder.
I guess to help with dkim/SPF issues, Constant Contact has started rewriting
the from header to the sender's address rewritten to e
On 21 Apr 2020, at 11:54, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> * mj:
> Our autoreply message reads: "Your email has not been read nor
>> forwarded", which is also the case, forcing the sender to take action.
>
> No, it does not. An auto-reply message, even if it is actually read by
> the sender, can be ignore
On 4/21/20 7:54 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote:
No, it does not. An auto-reply message, even if it is actually read by
the sender, can be ignored without penalty. An MTA rejection puts the
ball into the sender's court because the message has never been accepted
by the recipient's MX. By the way, a r
* mj:
> Our autoreply message reads: "Your email has not been read nor
> forwarded", which is also the case, forcing the sender to take action.
No, it does not. An auto-reply message, even if it is actually read by
the sender, can be ignored without penalty. An MTA rejection puts the
ball into th
Hi all,
Thanks for the interesting discussion.
The idea behind the catch-all mailbox is basically to have a
transitional period between now and the nullmx config we did not know
about. (thanks for mentioning that, we will do it!)
Our autoreply message reads: "Your email has not been read nor
I do agree with that. It depends on what he wants to do and how to handle the
old domain stuff.
Remo
> On Apr 20, 2020, at 18:13, @lbutlr wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 20 Apr 2020, at 04:27, mj wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ralph!
>>
>> Thanks for your reply!
>>
>> On 4/20/20 12:19 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote:
>>>
On Apr 20, 2020, at 19:13, @lbutlr wrote:
>
> The other thing you can do is NOMX the old domain.
Sorry, nullmx is what I meant.
Btw, I think this is the best solution.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 20 Apr 2020, at 04:27, mj wrote:
>
> Hi Ralph!
>
> Thanks for your reply!
>
> On 4/20/20 12:19 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote:
>> I suggest you don't use Sieve for this, but simply configure Postfix
>> to reject messages to @old.domain.com with the desired message. MTA
>> rejections signal cl
Well, I do not use postfix, but qmail. I would however, create an autorepond
telling them the new address and then fwd the old address to the new one.
But nothing to do with sieve, it’s at the SMTP level.
Remo
> On Apr 20, 2020, at 08:40, Ralph Seichter wrote:
>
> * mj:
>
>> this means tho
* mj:
> this means those emails are not actually delivered anymore.
Sure. That's how I interpreted your notification text "This message is
sent automatically, and your message has NOT been read nor forwarded."
If the message is not being read, why accept it in the first place?
> For now, I would
Hi Ralph!
Thanks for your reply!
On 4/20/20 12:19 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote:
I suggest you don't use Sieve for this, but simply configure Postfix
to reject messages to @old.domain.com with the desired message. MTA
rejections signal clearly that the message has not been delivered, and
you can als
* mj:
> Can anyone suggest what to do here?
I suggest you don't use Sieve for this, but simply configure Postfix
to reject messages to @old.domain.com with the desired message. MTA
rejections signal clearly that the message has not been delivered, and
you can also include an URL pointing to a web
Hi,
We are trying to auto-reply to emails that still use one of our old
domains. To do this, I have setup a catch-all mailbox for anything sent
to that old domain using postfix virtual:
@old.domain.com catch-...@new.domain.com
Then I defined a sieve script for catch-...@new.domain.com,
On 3 Jul 2019, at 01:28, Stephan Bosch via dovecot wrote:
> On 03/07/2019 04:44, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
>> I have the following in my active sieve file, and there are no errors logged.
>>
>>
>> if header :contains "to" "+root" {
>>setflag "\\Seen";
>>fileinto :create "root";
>>st
On 03/07/2019 04:44, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
I have the following in my active sieve file, and there are no errors logged.
if header :contains "to" "+root" {
setflag "\\Seen";
fileinto :create "root";
stop;
}
The message is put in .root, bit is not marked as seen.
Is the def
I have the following in my active sieve file, and there are no errors logged.
if header :contains "to" "+root" {
setflag "\\Seen";
fileinto :create "root";
stop;
}
The message is put in .root, bit is not marked as seen.
Is the default action to put mail in a folder matching the extensi
Op 10-2-2016 om 10:30 schreef @lbutlr:
On Feb 10, 2016, at 12:18 AM, A.L.E.C wrote:
require ["copy"]
if header :contains “from” “t...@example.com” {
redirect :copy “us...@example.com”;
redirect “us...@example.com”;
}
Ah, right, that makes sense. Thanks.
The copy extension is not ne
On Feb 10, 2016, at 12:18 AM, A.L.E.C wrote:
> require ["copy"]
> if header :contains “from” “t...@example.com” {
> redirect :copy “us...@example.com”;
> redirect “us...@example.com”;
> }
Ah, right, that makes sense. Thanks.
--
Honesty may be the best policy, but insanity is a better defe
On 02/10/2016 02:18 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
> Is it possible to use redirect in a sieve to redirect to multiple addresses?
>
> if header :contains “from” “t...@example.com” {
> redirect “us...@example.com,us...@example.com”;
> }
I never tried, but according to RFC redirect argument is supposed to be
Is it possible to use redirect in a sieve to redirect to multiple addresses?
if header :contains “from” “t...@example.com” {
redirect “us...@example.com,us...@example.com”;
}
I thought this would work, But I am seeing a “redirect address is invalid: not
a single addres [sic] (found ‘,’).
--
Op 13-6-2011 4:41, Dhaval Patel schreef:
--
require "fileinto";
if header :contains "X-Spam-Flag" "YES" {
fileinto "spam";
}
--
My first question is, where is this global sc
I have successfully setup Postfix -> Dovecot with virtual users and spam
filtering with spamassassin. Now the last remaining part is for the user defined
rules. Let me describe my environment and what I am trying to achieve.
I have Postfix setup to call spamc and deliver to Dovecot according to th
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 19:38:34 +0200 "Leander S."
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a possibility to give the if cases a AND / OR sensetivity?
You know about anyof/allof in the sieve language, yes?
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
Hi,
is there a possibility to give the if cases a AND / OR sensetivity?
if header :comparator "i;ascii-casemap" :contains "X-Spam-Flag" "YES"
*AND NO *"X-Amavis-Alert" "INFECTED"{
fileinto "Spam";
stop;
} elsif header :comparator "i;ascii-casemap" :contains "X-Amavis-Alert"
"INFECTED" {
On 10/16/2009 08:04 PM Thomas Harold wrote:
> …
> Ideally, it would be an option to the vacation element (i.e. "start
> time" and "end time"). The reason that a start/end time would be useful
> is in the case of where someone wants to setup their vacation replies
> ahead of time, and have them
On 7/7/2009 1:59 PM, CJ Keist wrote:
If there is a separate sieve mailing list let me know. But have
question if someone else has done this or not.
Right now I have web form people use to setup their vacation replies
using Sieve (1.1.6). The form alows them to set what they want their
repl
On 07/07/2009 07:59 PM CJ Keist wrote:
> If there is a separate sieve mailing list let me know. But have question
> if someone else has done this or not.
>
> Right now I have web form people use to setup their vacation replies
> using Sieve (1.1.6). The form alows them to set what they want the
If there is a separate sieve mailing list let me know. But have question
if someone else has done this or not.
Right now I have web form people use to setup their vacation replies
using Sieve (1.1.6). The form alows them to set what they want their
reply address to be, whether to send the r
28 matches
Mail list logo
