lda-dupes-file not updated, when user over quota and sieve vacation enabled

Hi, we have encountered an interesting behavior with users that have their mailboxes over quota while having sieve-vacation enabled. We do a temp fail, if a mailbox is over quota. Problem: If a remote sender sends an email to such a user (over quota + vacation), Dovecot directly

Re: Sieve vacation function sends auto-reply with generic From: Address

Hello Markus, Thank you for pointing me to the problem. It works after removing the wildcard rule. For some reason I did not consider the postfix config to be the culprit at all, we also have the same rule file on our main smtp server. But that one of course has additional config for configu

Re: Sieve vacation function sends auto-reply with generic From: Address

25.09.23, 14:57 +0200, Thomas Boroske: I have a question regarding the dovecot sieve vacation function that I am unable to answer myself by reading the documentation. A while ago we moved our dovecot server to a newer system (and newer dovecot version 2.3.16 ). This worked mostly fine

Sieve vacation function sends auto-reply with generic From: Address

Good day to you all. I have a question regarding the dovecot sieve vacation function that I am unable to answer myself by reading the documentation. A while ago we moved our dovecot server to a newer system (and newer dovecot version 2.3.16 ). This worked mostly fine, except there is now an

Re: dovecot with sieve vacation plugin

1) "sieve_user_email = %u" creates a warning: "Warning: sieve: Invalid address value for setting `sieve_user_email': Missing domain" That warning is a glitch, ignore it. I mentioned it on the list before but has not been fixed in any of the updates. What I am currently trying to figure out

Re: dovecot with sieve vacation plugin

1) "sieve_user_email = %u" creates a warning: "Warning: sieve: Invalid address value for setting `sieve_user_email': Missing domain" That warning is a glitch, ignore it. I mentioned it on the list before but has not been fixed in any of the updates. What I am currently trying to figure out

Re: dovecot with sieve vacation plugin

Why convert/alias a...@aaa.com to b@bbb.local? Why not setup dovecot to have a mailbox and receive mail for a...@aaa.com, allowing sieve to run for a...@aaa.com, and users login as a...@aaa.com on IMAP to check their mail? That would work if users only had one alias, but they don't - they have

Re: dovecot with sieve vacation plugin

Why convert/alias a...@aaa.com to b@bbb.local? Why not setup dovecot to have a mailbox and receive mail for a...@aaa.com, allowing sieve to run for a...@aaa.com, and users login as a...@aaa.com on IMAP to check their mail? That would work if users only had one alias, but they don't - they have s

Re: dovecot with sieve vacation plugin

s based on the From: address (which is set by the sieve vacation plugin) rather than the "mail from" address. -- Cheers spi ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org

Re: dovecot with sieve vacation plugin

Am 09.06.23 um 20:13 schrieb dovecot--- via dovecot: postfix (*) presents the right "rcpt to a...@aaa.com" to the milter filter, but sieve only sees the internal b@bbb.local. Why convert/alias a...@aaa.com to b@bbb.local? Why not setup dovecot to have a mailbox and receive mail for a...@aaa.c

Re: dovecot with sieve vacation plugin

postfix (*) presents the right "rcpt to a...@aaa.com" to the milter filter, but sieve only sees the internal b@bbb.local. Why convert/alias a...@aaa.com to b@bbb.local? Why not setup dovecot to have a mailbox and receive mail for a...@aaa.com, allowing sieve to run for a...@aaa.com, and users l

Re: dovecot with sieve vacation plugin

responses correctly? I did some more digging in my "mail process chain": incoming mail --> postfix (*) --> milter --> postfix --> lmtp/dovecot --> sieve postfix (*) presents the right "rcpt to a...@aaa.com" to the milter filter, but sieve only sees the internal b@bb

dovecot with sieve vacation plugin

Hi all I have an issue understanding the sieve vacation plugin. I can get it trigger for particular emails or something, but I don't get the sender setting right. My setup: I've got an external email address a...@aaa.com and a local b@bbb.local (which is used in virtual_mailb

Re: [SOLVED] Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

Spare your breath. I have solved my issue AWS-SES, and it behaves well now with Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation (s. patch attached) Many thanks for all your thoughts. I will leave the list now. Best regards Rolf Am 11.02.2023 um 09:01 schrieb Paul Kudla : Ok again just trying to help ___ The qu

[SOLVED] Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

Spare your breath. I have solved my issue AWS-SES, and it behaves well now with Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation (s. patch attached) Many thanks for all your thoughts. I will leave the list now. Best regards Rolf pigeonhole-vacation-sender-fix.patch Description: Binary data > Am 11.02.2023 um

Re: Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

Ok again just trying to help ___ The question on why I use AWS-SES as my outbound mail relays can be simply answered with the attribute „superior reputation“. ___ that being said, again an experience thing that most people do not know about ! opensrs (i use them for my domain registratio

RE: [OFF TOPIC] Re: Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

> > >> The actual problem is that Pigeonhole responds to to=<010301863b0211fe- > 9416f5b2-7e18-4c03-a5e5-2204dd7946f8-000...@sa-east-1.amazonses.com> instead > of to=. > Yes indeed, why are companies misusing the envelope for something different than it should be. The worst thing is even that t

Re: [OFF TOPIC] Re: Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

On 2023-02-10, Michael Peddemors wrote: > TOP POSTING for clarity > > I think this is getting off topic for the dovecot list. Vacation > messaging is a complex topic, and for the record it does seem that the > way they are doing vacation messages could use improvement. > > This should NOT be se

[OFF TOPIC] Re: Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

TOP POSTING for clarity I think this is getting off topic for the dovecot list. Vacation messaging is a complex topic, and for the record it does seem that the way they are doing vacation messages could use improvement. This should NOT be sent as a BOUNCE <>, and it should NOT come from MAI

Re: Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

As stated elsewhere, the severe problem of incomprehensible OoO notice comes not because I relay MY outbound mails via Amazon’s SES but because some of MY PEERS (senders of the original messages and receivers of OoO notices) do or perhaps other relays which do funny manipulations of envelope sen

Re: Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

Good morning, I have been following this post for a bit and would like to share experience please and thanks. This is not meant to give a solution but save some massive frustration with other system as i have gone through the same issues overall. In general I found found over the past few

Re: Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

> Am 08.02.2023 um 20:03 schrieb Michael Peddemors : > > Dovecot vacation message issues.. > Tough for any system to do correctly. > >> The problem here is that inbound mails from third parties utilizing AWS-SES >> come in with an unpersonalized envelope address and SES takes returns to >> this

Re: Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

> Am 08.02.2023 um 09:27 schrieb Stephan Bosch : >> On 8-2-2023 13:10, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: >>> Am 08.02.2023 um 08:37 schrieb Stephan Bosch : >>> >>> https://doc.dovecot.org/settings/pigeonhole-ext/vacation/#pigeonhole_setting-sieve_vacation_send_from_recipient >>> >>> On 7-2-2023 15:01, Dr. R

Re: Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

On 8-2-2023 13:10, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: Am 08.02.2023 um 08:37 schrieb Stephan Bosch : https://doc.dovecot.org/settings/pigeonhole-ext/vacation/#pigeonhole_setting-sieve_vacation_send_from_recipient On 7-2-2023 15:01, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: To begin with, usage of Amazons Simple Email Ser

Re: Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

> Am 08.02.2023 um 08:37 schrieb Stephan Bosch : > > https://doc.dovecot.org/settings/pigeonhole-ext/vacation/#pigeonhole_setting-sieve_vacation_send_from_recipient > > On 7-2-2023 15:01, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: >> To begin with, usage of Amazons Simple Email Service (SES) is mandatory for >> out

Re: Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

https://doc.dovecot.org/settings/pigeonhole-ext/vacation/#pigeonhole_setting-sieve_vacation_send_from_recipient On 7-2-2023 15:01, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: To begin with, usage of Amazons Simple Email Service (SES) is mandatory for outgoing mails from AWS-EC2 instances. The Pro is, it does work a

Re: Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

> Am 07.02.2023 um 17:54 schrieb jeremy ardley : > > On 7/2/23 22:01, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: >> To begin with, usage of Amazons Simple Email Service (SES) is mandatory for >> outgoing mails from AWS-EC2 instances. > > I run AWS-EC2 instances using postfix to send a receive mail. They can send >

Re: Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

On 2/8/23 05:33, jeremy ardley wrote: - AWS throttles but does not block traffic to a *destination* port 25. I set one up last week and can confirm that port 25 outbound was definitely blocked rather than throttled. However there's a form you can fill in to get it unblocked, and it only take

[OFF TOPIC] Re: Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

On 2023-02-07 13:33, jeremy ardley wrote: On 8/2/23 05:08, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: Am 07.02.2023 um 17:54 schrieb jeremy ardley: On 7/2/23 22:01, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: To begin with, usage of Amazons Simple Email Service (SES) is mandatory for outgoing mails from AWS-EC2 instances. I run AW

Re: Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

On 8/2/23 05:08, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: Am 07.02.2023 um 17:54 schrieb jeremy ardley: On 7/2/23 22:01, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: To begin with, usage of Amazons Simple Email Service (SES) is mandatory for outgoing mails from AWS-EC2 instances. I run AWS-EC2 instances using postfix to send a rec

Re: Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

> Am 07.02.2023 um 17:54 schrieb jeremy ardley : > > On 7/2/23 22:01, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: >> To begin with, usage of Amazons Simple Email Service (SES) is mandatory for >> outgoing mails from AWS-EC2 instances. > > I run AWS-EC2 instances using postfix to send a receive mail. They can send >

Re: Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

On 7/2/23 22:01, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: To begin with, usage of Amazons Simple Email Service (SES) is mandatory for outgoing mails from AWS-EC2 instances. I run AWS-EC2 instances using postfix to send a receive mail. They can send direct assuming I set up suitable SPF, but they typically forw

Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

To begin with, usage of Amazons Simple Email Service (SES) is mandatory for outgoing mails from AWS-EC2 instances. The Pro is, it does work and we may utilize email relays with high reputation for our outgoing mails at no additional costs. The Con's are that (A) SES does not relay mails with emp

RE: wondering if I configured sieve vacation correctly

sieve_vacation_send_from_recipient = "yes" > I have a user who feels compelled to use the vacation as autoreply to > confirm that a message has been received. The down side is of course, that > if spam/abuse messages get through the spam filters, this can get 'messy'. > > Currently I am getting t

wondering if I configured sieve vacation correctly

I have a user who feels compelled to use the vacation as autoreply to confirm that a message has been received. The down side is of course, that if spam/abuse messages get through the spam filters, this can get 'messy'. Currently I am getting these ndr's as postmaster(?). But I was not actuall

Re: Sieve vacation + SRS + forwarded e-mail

On 2021-07-09, Saarts, Erik wrote: > We have domain A on cloud, from where mail gets forwarded to our local > server to domain B. Forwarding is done in > SPF-compliant way by using SRS (this part we have no control > over).=C2=A0=C2=A0This SRS address ends up in > Return-Path he

Sieve vacation + SRS + forwarded e-mail

address ends up in Return-Path header, and sieve vacation replies to this address. This is all absolutely correct, but also useless, as sending mail to SRS address leads nowhere. I've tried to edit headers in sieve before passing control to vacation, but that does not work. I tried modi

Re: DOP-1414 sieve vacation address matching is case sensitive

On 09/11/2020 12:36, Mathieu Gosset wrote: Hello, One year ago a bug was reported regarding pigeonhole vacation plugin https://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg78588.html a mail sent to u...@domain.com instead of u...@domain.com will generate a " vacation action: discarding vacati

DOP-1414 sieve vacation address matching is case sensitive

Hello, One year ago a bug was reported regarding pigeonhole vacation plugin https://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg78588.html a mail sent to u...@domain.com instead of u...@domain.com will generate a " vacation action: discarding vacation response for implicitly delivered message; no

Sieve vacation not getting enough headers "no known (envelope) recipient address found in message headers"

I am getting these errors[1]. With fairly default setup where sendmail is delivering mail via lmtp. Adding these, do not seem to make a difference. Should I add something to the sendmail configuration? sieve_vacation_dont_check_recipient = no sieve_vacation_use_original_recipient = no [1]

Re: Sieve vacation :addresses match only case-sensitive?

Am 11.09.19 um 22:09 schrieb Stephan Bosch via dovecot: On 02/09/2019 15:05, Philipp Faeustlin via dovecot wrote: The recipients in the vacation :addresses String list are matched case-sensitive. If the recipient gets a mail with wrong case, the message is discarded with: "discarding vacati

[BUG REPORT] Case sensitivity in :addresses in sieve vacation scripts

Am Tue, 08 Oct 2019 08:13:29 -0400 schrieb James Cassell via dovecot : > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019, at 7:58 AM, Julian Kippels via dovecot wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have recently updated from Dovecot 2.2 to 2.3. Since I have > > noticed that vacation responses from sieve are not working the same > > any

Re: Case sensitivity in :addresses in sieve vacation scripts

On Tue, Oct 8, 2019, at 7:58 AM, Julian Kippels via dovecot wrote: > Hi, > > I have recently updated from Dovecot 2.2 to 2.3. Since I have noticed > that vacation responses from sieve are not working the same anymore. > For example, my sieve script looks like this: > > vacation :days 1 :addresse

Case sensitivity in :addresses in sieve vacation scripts

Hi, I have recently updated from Dovecot 2.2 to 2.3. Since I have noticed that vacation responses from sieve are not working the same anymore. For example, my sieve script looks like this: vacation :days 1 :addresses ["kipp...@hhu.de","julian.kipp...@hhu.de"] it used to be that I got a vacation

Re: Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only,>, case-sensitive?

Hi, >> I never saw any mail system in which the local Part ist Case sensitive! > > Every Unix/Linux system (I?d say that represents the majority of mail > systems) has a case sensitive local part. Most mail admins have set their > systems up to normalize all users on lowercase names, but that i

Re: [Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only,> case-sensitive?

On Sep 11, 2019, at 1:25 PM, Klaus Steinberger wrote: > I never saw any mail system in which the local Part ist Case sensitive! Every Unix/Linux system (I’d say that represents the majority of mail systems) has a case sensitive local part. Most mail admins have set their systems up to normaliz

Re: [Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only,> case-sensitive?

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 04:43:48PM -0400, Hendrik Boom via dovecot wrote: > Isn't the user name in the original Unix mail system (and presumably > most of its descentants) case sensitive? In which case it has to > distinguish between mail sent to bob and to Bob? Message handling systems MUST pr

Re: [Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only,> case-sensitive?

On 11/09/2019 22:43, Hendrik Boom via dovecot wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 09:25:54PM +0200, Klaus Steinberger via dovecot wrote: >>> I want to have it case-insensitive again, like in Pigeonhole version 0.4.24 >> >> i would also plea for making it case-insensitive again! We were hit by this >>

Re: [Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only,> case-sensitive?

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 09:25:54PM +0200, Klaus Steinberger via dovecot wrote: > > I want to have it case-insensitive again, like in Pigeonhole version 0.4.24 > > i would also plea for making it case-insensitive again! We were hit by this > too, > and I never saw any mail system in which the loca

Re: Sieve vacation :addresses match only case-sensitive?

On 02/09/2019 15:05, Philipp Faeustlin via dovecot wrote: The recipients in the vacation :addresses String list are matched case-sensitive. If the recipient gets a mail with wrong case, the message is discarded with: "discarding vacation response for implicitly delivered message; no known

Re: [Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only,> case-sensitive?

On 11/09/2019 21:25, Klaus Steinberger via dovecot wrote: I want to have it case-insensitive again, like in Pigeonhole version 0.4.24 i would also plea for making it case-insensitive again! We were hit by this too, and I never saw any mail system in which the local Part ist Case sensitive!

Re: [Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only,> case-sensitive?

> I want to have it case-insensitive again, like in Pigeonhole version 0.4.24 i would also plea for making it case-insensitive again! We were hit by this too, and I never saw any mail system in which the local Part ist Case sensitive! Sincerly, Klaus Steinberger -- Rechnerbetriebsgruppe / IT,

Re: [Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only case-sensitive?

Am 09.09.19 um 15:58 schrieb Sami Ketola: On 9 Sep 2019, at 16.17, Philipp Faeustlin via dovecot wrote: It is not recommended to rely on local-part case, but it is indeed case-sensitive. And this is to avoid such issues that postfix supports address cleanup/canonicalisati

Re: [Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only case-sensitive?

> On 9 Sep 2019, at 16.17, Philipp Faeustlin via dovecot > wrote: > >>It is not recommended to rely on local-part case, but it is indeed >>case-sensitive. >>And this is to avoid such issues that postfix supports address >>cleanup/canonicalisation before forwarding mails to dov

Re: [Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only case-sensitive?

It is not recommended to rely on local-part case, but it is indeed case-sensitive. And this is to avoid such issues that postfix supports address cleanup/canonicalisation before forwarding mails to dovecot. -- RFC 5321: "Local-part     = Dot-string / Quoted-s

Re: [Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only case-sensitive?

> > It is not recommended to rely on local-part case, but it is indeed > case-sensitive. > > And this is to avoid such issues that postfix supports address > cleanup/canonicalisation before forwarding mails to dovecot. > > -- > RFC 5321: > > "Local-part = Dot-string / Quoted-string ; MA

Re: [Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only case-sensitive?

> Le 4 sept. 2019 à 19:37, Roger Klorese via dovecot a > écrit : > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 8:25 AM Philipp Faeustlin via dovecot > mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org>> > Further investigation showed me that it has to be a bug. > > I tested with Dovecot 2.2.36.3 (a7d78f5a2), Pigeonhole version

Re: [Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only case-sensitive?

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 8:25 AM Philipp Faeustlin via dovecot < dovecot@dovecot.org> > Further investigation showed me that it has to be a bug. > > I tested with Dovecot 2.2.36.3 (a7d78f5a2), Pigeonhole version 0.4.24 > (5a7e9e62): > > In this version the additional addresses in vacation :addresses

Re: [Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only case-sensitive?

Am 02.09.19 um 15:05 schrieb Philipp Faeustlin via dovecot: The recipients in the vacation :addresses String list are matched case-sensitive. If the recipient gets a mail with wrong case, the message is discarded with: "discarding vacation response for implicitly delivered message; no known (

Sieve vacation :addresses match only case-sensitive?

The recipients in the vacation :addresses String list are matched case-sensitive. If the recipient gets a mail with wrong case, the message is discarded with: "discarding vacation response for implicitly delivered message; no known (envelope) recipient address found in message headers" I thin

Re: sieve vacation to an alias group

On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 11:16, Monis Monther via dovecot wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a solution for this? Not necessarily with vacation , even with > another tool. It feels like this should be a normal use case, but no one > has a solution to it. Any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks > Monis >

Re: sieve vacation to an alias group

Hi, Is there a solution for this? Not necessarily with vacation , even with another tool. It feels like this should be a normal use case, but no one has a solution to it. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Monis On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 3:18 PM Yassine Chaouche via dovecot < dovecot@dovecot.or

Re: sieve vacation to an alias group

On 3/10/19 12:35 PM, Monis Monther via dovecot wrote: [...] This is actually what I have done now, but I want it to be more robust, if this user quits, then I must have someone else in the group with the rule. [...] Yeah, a multipurpose, reusable notificati...@domain.tld fake / bot email

Re: sieve vacation to an alias group

@odhiambo : we may later, but currently we are dependent on this email Hi Yassine, This is actually what I have done now, but I want it to be more robust, if this user quits, then I must have someone else in the group with the rule. I have moved the rule from global sieve script to one of group

Re: sieve vacation to an alias group

Since sending to the alias will send to a, b and c, just define the filter on one mailbox only instead of making it global I guess. Yassine. On 3/10/19 11:51 AM, Yassine Chaouche via dovecot wrote: I am curious to know how did you define the filter on an alias in the first place ? is it a fi

Re: sieve vacation to an alias group

I am curious to know how did you define the filter on an alias in the first place ? is it a filter defined globaly in dovecot ? I don't see how it can be defined in any individual mailbox. Can you show the dovecot/sieve configuration to achieve this ? Yassine. On 3/10/19 11:40 AM, Monis Month

Re: sieve vacation to an alias group

I think you should run a true ticketing system like RT ( https://bestpractical.com/request-tracker) On Sun, Mar 10, 2019, 13:40 Monis Monther via dovecot wrote: > Hi Yassine, > > Thanks for the effort, unfortunately, we cannot turn it into an actual > mailbox, this is a long story that I don't w

Re: sieve vacation to an alias group

Hi Yassine, Thanks for the effort, unfortunately, we cannot turn it into an actual mailbox, this is a long story that I don't want to include here. but it would not be a valid option in our environment. Any other ideas Is it possible to do it with vacation? Is there another auto responder or plug

Re: sieve vacation to an alias group

On 3/10/19 9:07 AM, Yassine Chaouche via dovecot wrote: On 3/9/19 12:41 PM, Monis Monther via dovecot wrote: Hi, We have an alias group named x...@example.com , this alias group has 3 actual users a...@example.com , b...@example.com

Re: sieve vacation to an alias group

On 3/9/19 12:41 PM, Monis Monther via dovecot wrote: Hi, We have an alias group named x...@example.com , this alias group has 3 actual users a...@example.com , b...@example.com and c...@example.com

Re: sieve vacation to an alias group

Actually our customers feel the exact opposite and feel very happy when receiving the email, it tells customers that we did receive your request and someone has already seen it. If they don't receive this email they will start calling on the call center and asking if anyone has seen their email. T

Re: sieve vacation to an alias group

On 9 Mar 2019, at 06:43, Monis Monther via dovecot wrote: > Because its not actually a vacation, we are using it as an auto response > feature. Have you considered that your users hate auto-response messages and that "we got your mail" is basically saying "we'll get around to it in a much longe

Re: sieve vacation to an alias group

Because its not actually a vacation, we are using it as an auto response feature. Its a support group that should auto respond to the customer automatically for the first time. If there is another method to achieve this, then we are more than happy to change our setup. Thanks Monis On Sat, Mar

Re: sieve vacation to an alias group

On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 14:41, Monis Monther via dovecot wrote: > Hi, > > We have an alias group named x...@example.com, this alias group has 3 > actual users a...@example.com, b...@example.com and c...@example.com > > We set vacation rule on the generic sieve rule, the problem is that 3 > response

sieve vacation to an alias group

Hi, We have an alias group named x...@example.com, this alias group has 3 actual users a...@example.com, b...@example.com and c...@example.com We set vacation rule on the generic sieve rule, the problem is that 3 responses are sent to the original sender. (obviously because the rule is being exec

Re: sieve vacation alias handling problem

Thank you for sharing your solution! That made my life easier. Regards. Em 04/03/2018 08:08, Karol Augustin escreveu: On 2018-03-03 21:47, Karol Augustin wrote: On 2018-03-03 21:28, Stephan Bosch wrote: Op 3/2/2018 om 3:35 PM schreef Karol Augustin: Hi, I am using Dovecot LDA as LMTP rende

Re: sieve vacation alias handling problem

On 2018-03-03 21:47, Karol Augustin wrote: > On 2018-03-03 21:28, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> Op 3/2/2018 om 3:35 PM schreef Karol Augustin: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am using Dovecot LDA as LMTP renders envelope extension unusable. >>> >>> The problem I have noticed is that when user has multiple aliases siev

Re: sieve vacation alias handling problem

On 2018-03-03 21:28, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 3/2/2018 om 3:35 PM schreef Karol Augustin: >> Hi, >> >> I am using Dovecot LDA as LMTP renders envelope extension unusable. >> >> The problem I have noticed is that when user has multiple aliases sieve >> responds to all of them, not only to :addresse

Re: sieve vacation alias handling problem

Op 3/2/2018 om 3:35 PM schreef Karol Augustin: > Hi, > > I am using Dovecot LDA as LMTP renders envelope extension unusable. > > The problem I have noticed is that when user has multiple aliases sieve > responds to all of them, not only to :addresses specified. > > From testing it seems that :addre

sieve vacation alias handling problem

Hi, I am using Dovecot LDA as LMTP renders envelope extension unusable. The problem I have noticed is that when user has multiple aliases sieve responds to all of them, not only to :addresses specified. >From testing it seems that :addresses only adds addresses to the list of "known" emails to c

Re: Sieve vacation and srs

Op 9/22/2017 om 10:32 PM schreef azu...@pobox.sk: > Hi, > > is this already fixed? > > https://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2017-July/108688.html Yes: https://github.com/dovecot/pigeonhole/commit/70c218b5627b90b071c7196d5c6ee2063cc3515f The next release will include it. Regards, Stephan.

Sieve vacation and srs

Hi, is this already fixed? https://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2017-July/108688.html If so, which version of Dovecot includes fix for this? Thanks for info. azur

Re: sieve/vacation: bad parsing of 'References' header

On 29/06/2017 20:02, Stephan Bosch wrote: Op 6/29/2017 om 5:56 PM schreef Krzysztof Witek: On Thursday, June 29, 2017 16:38 CEST, Christian Kivalo wrote:Stephan Bosch already mentioned in this thread that it's is a more recent feature of doveconf to also report the version of pigeonhole. I did

Re: sieve/vacation: bad parsing of 'References' header

Op 6/29/2017 om 5:56 PM schreef Krzysztof Witek: > On Thursday, June 29, 2017 16:38 CEST, Christian Kivalo > wrote:Stephan Bosch already mentioned in this thread that it's is a more > recent feature of doveconf to also report the version of pigeonhole. > I didn't know that this hadn't existed in

Re: sieve/vacation: bad parsing of 'References' header

On Thursday, June 29, 2017 16:38 CEST, Christian Kivalo wrote:Stephan Bosch already mentioned in this thread that it's is a more recent feature of doveconf to also report the version of pigeonhole. I didn't know that this hadn't existed in dovecot v2.2.9.Yes sorry I saw his reply after I sent m

Re: sieve/vacation: bad parsing of 'References' header

On 2017-06-29 13:44, Krzysztof Witek wrote: Hi Christian, doveconf -n only dump dovecot version and its configuration: # 2.2.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.14.21-grsec x86_64 Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS  auth_cache_negative_ttl = 0 auth_master_user_separator = * auth_mechanisms = plain apop

Re: sieve/vacation: bad parsing of 'References' header

Hi Christian, doveconf -n only dump dovecot version and its configuration: # 2.2.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.14.21-grsec x86_64 Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS  auth_cache_negative_ttl = 0 auth_master_user_separator = * auth_mechanisms = plain apop login managesieve_notify_capability = mailto ma

Re: sieve/vacation: bad parsing of 'References' header

Op 29-6-2017 om 12:02 schreef Christian Kivalo: On 2017-06-29 11:28, Krzysztof Witek wrote: Hi Stephan Thank you for your reply. I'm using dovecot 2.2.9 packaged with ubuntu packages: dovecot-managesieved 1:2.2.9-1ubuntu2.1 amd64secure POP3/IMAP server - ManageSieve server dovecot

Re: sieve/vacation: bad parsing of 'References' header

On 2017-06-29 11:28, Krzysztof Witek wrote: Hi Stephan Thank you for your reply. I'm using dovecot 2.2.9 packaged with ubuntu packages: dovecot-managesieved  1:2.2.9-1ubuntu2.1   amd64        secure POP3/IMAP server - ManageSieve server dovecot-sieve               1:2.2.9-1ubuntu2.1   amd64    

Re: sieve/vacation: bad parsing of 'References' header

Hi Stephan Thank you for your reply. I'm using dovecot 2.2.9 packaged with ubuntu packages: dovecot-managesieved  1:2.2.9-1ubuntu2.1   amd64        secure POP3/IMAP server - ManageSieve server dovecot-sieve               1:2.2.9-1ubuntu2.1   amd64        secure POP3/IMAP server - Sieve filters

Re: sieve/vacation: bad parsing of 'References' header

Op 29-6-2017 om 10:33 schreef Krzysztof Witek: Hello there, I see a strange behavior in the sieve plugin. If I send an email containing the 'References' field with multiple values like this: What version of Pigeonhole is this? This looks like a problem that was solved ages ago. Regards, St

sieve/vacation: bad parsing of 'References' header

Hello there, I see a strange behavior in the sieve plugin. If I send an email containing the 'References' field with multiple values like this: References: <56cf3a8e.3060...@email.com>  <74cc03f4-899f-e76f-81ea-d0e8a0efc...@email.com>        <734f9013-c4a2-eab4-9c0d-2cfc3deaf...@email.com>  

Re: sieve vacation message if ....

On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:25:24 +0200, Stephan Bosch stated: >Op 23-6-2017 om 16:15 schreef Larry Rosenman: >> On 6/23/17, 9:13 AM, "dovecot on behalf of Jerry" >> wrote: >> >> On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:46:21 +0200, Stephan Bosch stated: >> >> >Op 21-6-2017 om 19:16 schreef lejeczek:

Re: sieve vacation message if ....

Op 23-6-2017 om 16:15 schreef Larry Rosenman: On 6/23/17, 9:13 AM, "dovecot on behalf of Jerry" wrote: On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:46:21 +0200, Stephan Bosch stated: >Op 21-6-2017 om 19:16 schreef lejeczek: >> hi fellas >> >> generic construct for(if possible): repl

Re: sieve vacation message if ....

On 6/23/17, 9:13 AM, "dovecot on behalf of Jerry" wrote: On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:46:21 +0200, Stephan Bosch stated: >Op 21-6-2017 om 19:16 schreef lejeczek: >> hi fellas >> >> generic construct for(if possible): reply vacation message if >> address is not from add1@com

Re: sieve vacation message if ....

On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:46:21 +0200, Stephan Bosch stated: >Op 21-6-2017 om 19:16 schreef lejeczek: >> hi fellas >> >> generic construct for(if possible): reply vacation message if >> address is not from add1@com1 add2@com2 >> >> would you share? > >require "vacation"; > >if not address "from" ["

Re: sieve vacation message if ....

Op 21-6-2017 om 19:16 schreef lejeczek: hi fellas generic construct for(if possible): reply vacation message if address is not from add1@com1 add2@com2 would you share? require "vacation"; if not address "from" ["add1@com1", "add2@com2"] { vacation "I am on vacation."; } Regards, S

sieve vacation message if ....

hi fellas generic construct for(if possible): reply vacation message if address is not from add1@com1 add2@com2 would you share? many thanks L.

Sieve vacation won't send second reply after timeout interval.

Hi I solved this by updating to Dovecot 2.2.24 David

Sieve vacation won't send second reply after timeout interval.

Hi there I'm having problems getting sieve to send a second vacation response. For testing I've set sieve_vacation_min_period = 500s and the seconds option in the script is 600. I send the first test message and get a reply fine I then wait about 12 minutes send a second message and get no reply.

  1   2   3   4   >