On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 04:44 +0300, luben karavelov wrote:
> 1st. There is some problem with imap + quota plugin. the corresponding logs:
>
> May 1 03:46:33 rho2 dovecot: imap(lu...@test.dpv.bg): Panic: file
> index-transaction.c: line 145 (index_transaction_rollback): assertion
> failed: (box->
On 1.05.2010 00:32, Timo Sirainen wrote:
v1.2 dbox is similar to v2.0's dbox, but not identical. v2.0 dbox is simpler
and faster. Also dbox and mdbox are different, although they share some code.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox
Anyway, v2.0 is supposed to be able to read v1.2's db
On 1.5.2010, at 0.25, luben karavelov wrote:
> My tests and benchmarks were done using v1.2.11. May be I should make some
> benchmarks for mdbox also using dovecot v2. My understanding is that dbox
> is forward compatible with mdbox and there will be no need to convert
> mailboxes from dbox to mdb
On 29.04.2010 21:02, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 15:51 +0300, karavelov wrote:
3. My understanding is that OCFS2 uses a global lock for move/rename.
As you know, Maildir format uses a lot of such operations. I think
that
dbox format (dovecot native) will be better choice, bec
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 15:51 +0300, karavelov wrote:
> 3. My understanding is that OCFS2 uses a global lock for move/rename.
> As you know, Maildir format uses a lot of such operations. I think
> that
> dbox format (dovecot native) will be better choice, because there are
> no file moves/renames. I
On 26.04.2010 21:42, Philipp Snizek wrote:
So bottom line is to use a filesystem such as XFS, distribute and
dedicate mailboxes to a number of backend imap servers optimally with
direct access to the storage and do imap proxying and loadbalancing in
front of those servers.
Then you should
On 26.04.2010 14:51, karavelov wrote:
On 26.04.2010 14:37, mailingli...@belfin.ch wrote:
Hi,
I would like to run my imap service on a active-active cluster. I wonder
how well OCFS2 performs in read and write with millions of smallest files
involved. Has anybody got any experience?
Thanks
John
On 26.04.2010 14:37, mailingli...@belfin.ch wrote:
Hi,
I would like to run my imap service on a active-active cluster. I wonder
how well OCFS2 performs in read and write with millions of smallest files
involved. Has anybody got any experience?
Thanks
John
I have some experience.
I have d
