On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 15:51 +0300, karavelov wrote: > 3. My understanding is that OCFS2 uses a global lock for move/rename. > As you know, Maildir format uses a lot of such operations. I think > that > dbox format (dovecot native) will be better choice, because there are > no file moves/renames. I am planning migration to dbox now. If I have > to start the service now, I would choose dbox for mail storage.
Wonder what the performance difference is then between v2.0's single-dbox and multi-dbox? I'd guess mdbox is faster.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
